Bonita Platform vs. OpenText MBPM

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Bonita Platform
ScoreΒ 8.3Β outΒ ofΒ 10
N/A
Bonita is an open-source business process and workflow management platform created by the French National Institute for Research in Computer Science. It is available as a free community edition or as a commercial subscription product.N/A
OpenText MBPM
ScoreΒ 7.2Β outΒ ofΒ 10
N/A
OpenText acquired BPM solution Metastorm in 2011, and has rebranded the product as OpenText MBPM. It is an alternative BPM solution to OpenText's primary BPM offering called OpenText Cordys Business Process Management.N/A
Pricing
Bonita PlatformOpenText MBPM
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Bonita PlatformOpenText MBPM
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Detailsβ€”β€”
More Pricing Information
Features
Bonita PlatformOpenText MBPM
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Bonita Platform
7.2
43 Ratings
12% below category average
OpenText MBPM
7.0
3 Ratings
15% below category average
Dashboards7.641 Ratings7.93 Ratings
Standard reports6.140 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Custom reports7.940 Ratings4.03 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
Bonita Platform
7.7
53 Ratings
9% below category average
OpenText MBPM
7.3
3 Ratings
14% below category average
Process designer8.652 Ratings8.13 Ratings
Process simulation6.910 Ratings7.13 Ratings
Business rules engine8.142 Ratings9.02 Ratings
SOA support7.640 Ratings6.02 Ratings
Process player6.78 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Support for modeling languages8.538 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Form builder7.948 Ratings6.93 Ratings
Model execution7.648 Ratings6.13 Ratings
Collaboration
Comparison of Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Bonita Platform
6.9
24 Ratings
17% below category average
OpenText MBPM
7.6
3 Ratings
8% below category average
Social collaboration tools6.924 Ratings7.63 Ratings
Content Management Capabilties
Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Product A and Product B
Bonita Platform
6.9
34 Ratings
16% below category average
OpenText MBPM
6.0
2 Ratings
30% below category average
Content management6.934 Ratings6.02 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Bonita PlatformOpenText MBPM
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
ScoreΒ 9.7Β outΒ ofΒ 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
ScoreΒ 9.7Β outΒ ofΒ 10
Medium-sized Companies
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
ScoreΒ 9.7Β outΒ ofΒ 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
ScoreΒ 9.7Β outΒ ofΒ 10
Enterprises
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
ScoreΒ 9.1Β outΒ ofΒ 10
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
ScoreΒ 9.1Β outΒ ofΒ 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Bonita PlatformOpenText MBPM
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(53 ratings)
7.1
(5 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.3
(4 ratings)
8.0
(4 ratings)
Usability
7.5
(25 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
4.6
(3 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
4.5
(5 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
7.3
(10 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
7.5
(10 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Bonita PlatformOpenText MBPM
Likelihood to Recommend
Bonitasoft
Well suited for low code/no code applications centered around approval flows. It has built-in task management for users to see their pending actions, comments, statuses, etc. It has a very nice design for process flows. Less appropriate may be for generic type applications with complex screens and logic within those screens that need a lot of data to process.
Read full review
OpenText
Metastorm is well-suited for scenarios in which internal stress testing an application is needed in a hurry before showcasing it to potential customers. It supports different views of the process from Swimlane perspective, so different methodologies can be handled. It is an Enterprise level tool and handles both small and large projects quite well, although smaller companies may be stressed out by the amount of time it takes to properly maintain the application.
Read full review
Pros
Bonitasoft
  • Bonita seems particularly suited for processes requiring a great deal of human interaction. Its user model allows you to control access to business processes in a fine-grained way. This allows for business processes to move smoothly between users and services as the process advances.
  • The definition and usage of custom forms from the latest version of Bonita seems particularly powerful. It allows for a thorough customization of the look-and-feel and does not require complex developments.
  • The web interface and administration section have greatly improved in the latest versions. Installation and configuration of processes has become more flexible and more structured. The administration section gives a good view on failed processes, allowing to analyse problems in an efficient way.
Read full review
OpenText
  • Complex routing of tasks based on calculated criteria
  • Linking between tasks and accessing relevant information
  • Organising, scheduling and prioritising
  • Different views for different people
Read full review
Cons
Bonitasoft
  • There is a learning curve beyond the boot camps that needs to be addressed with more structured curriculum.
  • The full stack technologies are industry standard, but these [are] challenging to learn and could use a learning path and orientation. There's probably opportunity for third-parties here to help with learning and adoption.
Read full review
OpenText
  • The Metastorm process engine is based on an older version of .NET. Updating to a newer version would resolve several known issues with .NET email functionality.
  • Metastorm builds web pages at run time. While the UI presented to the end user is fine, the Document Object Model is convoluted and subject to change with new releases. Providing a more simplified DOM or at very least a custom function to replace document.getElementById() would make client-side scripting a much more powerful tool.
  • One function that I've seen Metastorm competitors do well, is email wizards. Having a WYSIWYG email editor would be really nice.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Bonitasoft
We just renewed our license
Read full review
OpenText
There are other products that seem to be a better fit for future initiatives.
Read full review
Usability
Bonitasoft
Bonita Platform has allowed us to develop GUI relatively fast using its UI Designer while being able to seamlessly integrate our business logic in Java in a BPMN2 process diagram. It gives a nice productivity boost but still requires programming know-how to be able to deliver the final solution to your business problems.
Read full review
OpenText
Although it is intuitive to use it does require training
Read full review
Performance
Bonitasoft
Engine itself is efficient enough for most cases I dealt with. It can also be extended by clustering. I have done performance tests with JMeter and only managed to induce the crash of... JMeter. If there are efficiency issues they usually concern bad design/implementation of created apps or bottlenecks in integrated systems. Although I have met two cases with efficiency loss.
1. Java 7 related PermGen saturation caused by big number of installed apps (there is no jar dependency reusal between apps option).
2. Big number of waiting event handlers in processes stresses the database.
Read full review
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Bonitasoft
It was sometimes difficult to get support on Bonita API.
Read full review
OpenText
Great customer service for an API support related query
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Bonitasoft
Nothing in particular
Read full review
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Bonitasoft
RHPAM is maybe a very good BPM process engine but is very limited to build a complete application.
We also try site soft W4 which needs more developments to build an application. We finally choose Bonita which is easier to get ready with.
Read full review
OpenText
We found that OpenText MBPM held its own quite well against IBM BPM. We ended up choosing OpenText MBPM due to the analytics, complex routing, and the ease of SOA service integration. Furthermore, the ability to quickly develop simple User interfaces make this tool a daily component of our most-used toolbox components.
Read full review
Scalability
Bonitasoft
Respect of BPMN standard over the long term. Good enhancements by Bonitasoft for new use cases, for example the introduction of a real form editor even if it has been technically difficult to manage. Once done though, we have far greater possibility of human interaction.
Read full review
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Bonitasoft
  • Case management provided as better tracking which help us to meet SLAs.
  • Auto email notification helps to address "Where are my request" answers which eventually increased our customer delight index.
  • By using the third-party integration, we are able to provide visibility w.r.t end to end request status.
Read full review
OpenText
  • The development of the ticketing system has enabled us to greatly improve customer relationships
  • The scheduling and allocation of the tasks has reduced both the number of open tickets and the turnaround time to resolution
  • Management information from the system has improved decision making
Read full review
ScreenShots

Bonita Platform Screenshots

Screenshot of Process designed in Bonita BPM StudioScreenshot of Bonita BPM project overviewScreenshot of Fully customized end user interfaceScreenshot of Bonita BPM Admin App