Bound vs. SiteSpect

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Bound
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Bound (formerly Get Smart Content) is a website segmentation and targeting platform that enables marketers to read a website visitor's digital body language and serve relevant content based on the person's stage in the buying journey. Using behavioral, demographic, and firmographic data, Bound creates personalized web experiences for both anonymous and known website visitors to increase the effectiveness of marketing efforts and dramatically reduce the buyer's path to conversion. Bound partners…N/A
SiteSpect
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Key features include: - A/B, split, and multivariate testing campaign management - Targeting and personalization - Front-end usability testing - Back-end testing using Origin Experiments - Site acceleration with SiteSpect AMPS(R) - Mobile site and native app support
$0
Pricing
BoundSiteSpect
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
SiteSpect Enterprise
SiteSpect Cloud
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BoundSiteSpect
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalRequired
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
BoundSiteSpect
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Bound
9.7
1 Ratings
12% above category average
SiteSpect
-
Ratings
a/b experiment testing10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Split URL testing9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Multivariate testing9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Cross-browser testing10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile app testing9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Test significance10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Advanced code editor10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Page surveys10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Visitor recordings9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Preview mode10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Test duration calculator10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Experiment scheduler9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Client-side tests10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Server-side tests10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Bound
9.8
1 Ratings
11% above category average
SiteSpect
-
Ratings
Standard visitor segmentation10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Traffic allocation control9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Website personalization10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Bound
9.4
1 Ratings
9% above category average
SiteSpect
-
Ratings
Heatmap tool10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Click analytics10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Scroll maps9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Form fill analysis10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Conversion tracking8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Goal tracking9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Test reporting9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Results segmentation10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
CSV export10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Experiments results dashboard9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
BoundSiteSpect
Small Businesses
Kameleoon
Kameleoon
Score 9.5 out of 10
Kameleoon
Kameleoon
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Kameleoon
Kameleoon
Score 9.5 out of 10
Kameleoon
Kameleoon
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Kameleoon
Kameleoon
Score 9.5 out of 10
Kameleoon
Kameleoon
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BoundSiteSpect
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(5 ratings)
6.6
(9 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.3
(7 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
BoundSiteSpect
Likelihood to Recommend
Bound Systems, Inc.
I think the customer service and relationship we have with Get Smart Content is great
Read full review
SiteSpect, Inc.
SiteSpect is great for businesses with available development resources and a need to provide flicker-free performance. Additionally, the month-to-month service model is attractive considering the contract and implementation prices of most of the tool's competitors. If an organization wants to run a lot of tests with a small team of marketers, I wouldn't recommend a tool as complex as SiteSpect. Effective use of the tool requires a lot of technical skill.
Read full review
Pros
Bound Systems, Inc.
  • Connects easily with other APIs such as Demandbase and Google Analytics.
  • Easily create segments.
  • Easily create segmented content.
Read full review
SiteSpect, Inc.
  • It is able to intercept the code from your server, inject your code and then it continues on to the end-user's computer with virtually no speed interruptions.
  • It has several different options for performing A/B tests from regular factors to client-side factors, and origin experiments.
  • It is extremely flexible and configurable for the needs of your company or organization.
Read full review
Cons
Bound Systems, Inc.
  • When you set up a campaign you should be able to set up content while in the campaign.
  • You should be able to set up new segments while in the campaign.
Read full review
SiteSpect, Inc.
  • SiteSpect recently came out with a feature to test and optimize mobile applications. I have not used this, but it fills an important capability gap with the product I was using at the time.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Bound Systems, Inc.
No answers on this topic
SiteSpect, Inc.
Our clients who use our fully managed A/B and Multivariate testing services have been extremely happy with the results. Therefore the D&W and SiteSpect partnership continues to flourish. We have no hesitation in recommending the platform and we will continue to invest in our staff to train on this platform for the foreseeable future
Read full review
Support Rating
Bound Systems, Inc.
No answers on this topic
SiteSpect, Inc.
When we have any questions on how the tool can be utilized for some unique requirements, they always make excellent suggestions.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Bound Systems, Inc.
No answers on this topic
SiteSpect, Inc.
Just need to have your requirements ready such as, what you are expecting from the tool, is there anything specific you want regarding reporting, tracking etc.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Bound Systems, Inc.
It has the inability to export subject line or ISP complaints that require manual pulling by each campaign when needed. Results from variable tests are also reported only as a percentage of chosen KPI (opens, clicks, etc.). There's no ability to see hard numbers from the tests or other metrics to determine the statistical significance or unintended results (maybe opens increased per the test, but we saw clicks or conversions were lower). On the other hand, Bound performs absolutely great.
Read full review
SiteSpect, Inc.
I have used all the tools in the market. Sitespect kicks them into the curb based on how easy it is to build variations, and hot it doesnt interfere with client load.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Bound Systems, Inc.
  • We have seen more traffic going to revenue generating sites after using Get Smart Content. I'm not sure of the dollar amount since that's a separate department, but traffic increasing is great.
  • Engagement on our internal site has increased after implementing Get Smart Content. We are getting more views, comments and likes on our content than before.
Read full review
SiteSpect, Inc.
  • Easily test and optimize the effectiveness of landing pages, layouts, variations of copy, different offers, photos, navigation elements, links, buttons, and more – all without having to change your existing site.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Bound Screenshots

Screenshot of Campaign viewScreenshot of Segment viewScreenshot of Segment list