Discuss.io vs. Wynter

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Discuss.io
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Discuss, headquartered in Seattle, serves market research, customer and user experience teams with a video platform for customer insights and empathy. Enterprise-level brands and their partners can use Discuss.io to enable purposeful connections with their key audiences and to capture and share insights across their organizations in real-time.N/A
Wynter
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Target market insights platform for B2B SaaS marketers. It is used to get answers to questions about target customers in under 48 hrs. Wynter helps to uncover target customers' pain points, what they need, how they buy, and what resonates with them. ‍ Wynter's services are on-demand, and the company promises to deliver results in 12-48 hrs.
$6,990
per year
Pricing
Discuss.ioWynter
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Discuss.ioWynter
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
Discuss.ioWynter
Financial Research
Comparison of Financial Research features of Product A and Product B
Discuss.io
-
Ratings
Wynter
9.1
2 Ratings
0% above category average
Industry-Specific Information00 Ratings9.12 Ratings
Independent Research Access00 Ratings9.12 Ratings
Market Research
Comparison of Market Research features of Product A and Product B
Discuss.io
-
Ratings
Wynter
8.5
13 Ratings
1% below category average
Competitor Research00 Ratings8.44 Ratings
Consumer Feedback00 Ratings8.913 Ratings
Market Insights and Reports00 Ratings8.27 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Discuss.ioWynter
Small Businesses
Qualtrics
Qualtrics
Score 7.5 out of 10
Qualtrics
Qualtrics
Score 7.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Qualtrics
Qualtrics
Score 7.5 out of 10
Qualtrics
Qualtrics
Score 7.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Qualtrics
Qualtrics
Score 7.5 out of 10
Qualtrics
Qualtrics
Score 7.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Discuss.ioWynter
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(14 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Discuss.ioWynter
Likelihood to Recommend
Discuss.io
No answers on this topic
Wynter
Wynter is ideal when you are doing "high-pressure" message testing where live traffic with A/B audiences isn't effective. Similarly, it's a great way to gather prospective customer data when you don't have access to a customer base for your questions or the cost of sourcing them yourself would be too high.
Read full review
Pros
Discuss.io
No answers on this topic
Wynter
  • Targeted survey groups of our exact ICP
  • Easy to digest survey results
  • Various feedback types to drill down on useful data
Read full review
Cons
Discuss.io
No answers on this topic
Wynter
  • In my opinion, doesn't have a deep pool of respondents for all titles, but growing
  • I think the website look could be modernized
  • In my experience, customizing questions sometimes a little tricky, but works
Read full review
Support Rating
Discuss.io
No answers on this topic
Wynter
Every customer support professional I have interacted with at Wynter is helpful, responsive, and well-informed on the product and where they can help. They go above and beyond!
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Discuss.io
No answers on this topic
Wynter
Wynter is the only online platform I've used for this kind of focus group message testing.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Discuss.io
No answers on this topic
Wynter
  • Time and cost savings which are really hard to quantify, yet substantial for making the case and getting budget approved.
  • Finding & interviewing people that fit your ICP could take anywhere from 2 weeks to months. With Wynter, I get them in 12-24 hours.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Wynter Screenshots

Screenshot of DashboardScreenshot of Test historyScreenshot of Message test resultsScreenshot of Survey summaryScreenshot of Message test results summary