DocuSign CLM vs. Evisort

DocuSign is useful for collecting electronic signatures on isolated documents and packets that are administered separately or integrated into another system. DocuSign is integrated into our onboarding system, Paylocity, which is where the employee completes all onboarding tasks required for employment. Integrating DocuSign with Paylocity allows us to send documents that require more than one signature along with other onboarding tasks, which makes for a less confusing onboarding experience for the worker. DocuSign also allows us to automatically run E-Verify from the integrated Form I-9 Document, which saves us lots of time onboarding each employee.

Incentivized

Evisort is best when you already have all your contracts fully cleaned, designated, ordered, managed, linked, collated, titled and termed. It is not good if you expect the platform to help you go through a repository of contracts that you want the system to extract all the info you need and then you can decide easily what to keep and not etc - the sales team will tell you that the platform can do all of this. In my opinion, this isn't true.

Incentivized

• Alerts when documents are signed
• Notifications if customers don't complete any or all of their required tasks
• Showing clients exactly where to sign
• Making signing easy and fast

Incentivized

• Houses Contracts centrally
• Info display is pretty straight forward
• Terms Search function is solid

Incentivized

• Increase sending limit for initial plans
• Faster return for client service requests
• When correcting a document, no new email is sent for notification of an update. The clients have to go back to the old document, and it feels uncomfortable for them.

Incentivized

• Platform Implementation
• AI intake of documents
• How contracts are linked

Incentivized

It is clunkier than needs to be but it's not as bad as some of the other platforms we reviewed. The interface is pretty spartan, almost like reading a page and some color and segregation could help users segregate the UI by function and task. This is pretty straight forward but doubt they would implement

Incentivized

I am constantly experiencing issues with SpringCM.

Incentivized

For all of the reasons listed above, essentially, once the platform is implemented it has its value, however, knowing what you get before implementation, might give ppl pause. The cost is a bit misleading and the sales team over promises and under delivers in my opinion. This is not cool and creates issues inevitably, down the line.

Incentivized

Adobe Acrobat Sign was a more confusing process compared to DocuSign CLM. Acrobat presented signature abilities, yet sometimes this was electronic and sometimes this was done manually. Additionally, it is difficult to send and track the document when it goes to more than one signatory.

Incentivized

Evisort is just getting in the game. Implementation is not as robust as Coupa and Adobe is more of a contract execution platform so it is not apples to apples to compare there. Essentially, Evisort is a a somewhat cheaper solution that is not a complete solution and needs more of an upfront lift than they would suggest.

Incentivized

• Positive - has helped us track renewals which allows us to get out of "bad" contracts or renew "good" ones.
• Negative - we had hoped for it to help us determine which terms and conditions we have agreed to in other contracts. This has made contract review remain a lengthy process.
• Positive - We are now able to find all of our contracts which has helped us get out of unnecessary contracts (which positively impacts finances).

Incentivized

• better Contract visibility
• centralized ownership
• contract alerts

Incentivized