eMaint CMMS vs. FacilityBot

eMaint is well suited to larger facilities with dedicated scheduler/planners. Learning to navigate the database and create reports requires a dedicated resource. Part-time users often forget the process for entering data and navigating the database. In smaller organizations where multiple users enter assets, planned maintenance (PM) tasks and vendors, keeping standardization in the system formatting was difficult.

Incentivized

Facilities Managers spend their days ensuring that the building operations are running smoothly and efficiently. Using FacilityBot helps them to digitize their FM workflows so that can manage their time more easily and effectively. It's all about working smarter, not harder! The asset management function of FacilityBot is also beneficial and useful. The tool also provides easy-to-read statistics reports for users.

• We like that eMaint is highly configurable. You can customize fields to meet your needs
• You can store and track documents and photos assigned to your assets
• You can run custom reports.
• Great customer service

Incentivized

• Fault Reporting
• Asset Management
• Preventive Maintenance

• Functionality not delivered as promised - on usage of tab.
• QR code functionality.
• Friction between implementation team and marketing team that sold this to us.

Incentivized

• Limited checklist templates
• To have extension for the free trial
• There is room for improvement in terms of customization of simple reports.

Customer support was always readily available, even when natural disasters were taking place.

Incentivized

eMaint was by far most the most comprehensive and customizable solution we looked at. The eMaint team was also extremely responsive and available during the selection process. The product training and conferences were very helpful for new user orientation and best practice learning. The customizable reports also allowed us to provide data to management in an easy to digest format

Incentivized

FacilityBot replaced multiple layers of coordination and communication between users and subcontractors. There are many facilities management systems that are not user-friendly on the market. Most of them do not support multiple communication methods and are costly. Unlike FacilityBot, the implementation wasn't as straightforward. In terms of features, not many are as feature-rich as FacilityBot.

• We easily track service events over multiple locations so we are able to save on costs
• Able to run asset lists for inspections
• Able to keep up with contracts' renewals and service costs

Incentivized

• Quick and prompt fault reporting and tracking
• Save cost and resources
• FacilityBot also provides simple and evaluated statistics