Epicor Kinetic vs. IBM Maximo Application Suite

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Epicor Kinetic
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Epicor Kinetic (the name of the former Epicor ERP) presents a wide feature breadth, customizability, and scalability, typical product-centric cloud ERP offerings. It is meant as a single, end-to-end software solution for businesses, and is available on-premise, hosted, or in the cloud as a software as a service (SaaS) solution.N/A
IBM Maximo Application Suite
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
IBM Maximo Application Suite is an enterprise asset management (EAM) platform.N/A
Pricing
Epicor KineticIBM Maximo Application Suite
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Epicor KineticIBM Maximo Application Suite
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsMust contact sales team for pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Epicor KineticIBM Maximo Application Suite
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Epicor KineticIBM Maximo Application Suite
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.4
13 Ratings
3% above category average
IBM Maximo Application Suite
-
Ratings
Pay calculation7.713 Ratings00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration7.79 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct deposit files6.39 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
6.0
26 Ratings
19% below category average
IBM Maximo Application Suite
-
Ratings
API for custom integration6.124 Ratings00 Ratings
Plug-ins6.022 Ratings00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.5
37 Ratings
8% below category average
IBM Maximo Application Suite
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability8.030 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions7.037 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.4
37 Ratings
19% above category average
IBM Maximo Application Suite
-
Ratings
Dashboards7.936 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports9.036 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports8.332 Ratings00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.1
36 Ratings
7% below category average
IBM Maximo Application Suite
-
Ratings
Accounts payable7.334 Ratings00 Ratings
Accounts receivable7.235 Ratings00 Ratings
Global Financial Support9.016 Ratings00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers6.316 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations7.319 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting7.917 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes8.018 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
9.9
36 Ratings
23% above category average
IBM Maximo Application Suite
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking9.935 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic reordering9.921 Ratings00 Ratings
Location management9.928 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.7
39 Ratings
11% above category average
IBM Maximo Application Suite
-
Ratings
Pricing9.036 Ratings00 Ratings
Order entry8.039 Ratings00 Ratings
Credit card processing7.219 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold8.938 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Orchestration9.916 Ratings00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.8
22 Ratings
17% above category average
IBM Maximo Application Suite
-
Ratings
Billing Management9.917 Ratings00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management9.918 Ratings00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management5.713 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting8.914 Ratings00 Ratings
Period Close8.218 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
9.2
19 Ratings
19% above category average
IBM Maximo Application Suite
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting9.015 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Costing8.016 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost Capture10.017 Ratings00 Ratings
Capital Project Management9.011 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance9.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition9.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.6
14 Ratings
11% above category average
IBM Maximo Application Suite
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling7.612 Ratings00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers5.47 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality7.25 Ratings00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools7.36 Ratings00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.8
7 Ratings
3% above category average
IBM Maximo Application Suite
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.2
13 Ratings
16% above category average
IBM Maximo Application Suite
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared8.75 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Authoring9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Repository7.75 Ratings00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated8.87 Ratings00 Ratings
Supplier Management7.910 Ratings00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.9
3 Ratings
19% above category average
IBM Maximo Application Suite
-
Ratings
Risk Repository8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Management8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue Detection8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.3
11 Ratings
6% above category average
IBM Maximo Application Suite
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization7.75 Ratings00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management7.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management7.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management5.18 Ratings00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management7.76 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.1
20 Ratings
7% above category average
IBM Maximo Application Suite
-
Ratings
Production Process Design7.915 Ratings00 Ratings
Production Management7.619 Ratings00 Ratings
Configuration Management8.113 Ratings00 Ratings
Work Execution7.715 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs9.319 Ratings00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
9.4
21 Ratings
26% above category average
IBM Maximo Application Suite
-
Ratings
Forecasting8.917 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Planning8.920 Ratings00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring9.915 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.6
7 Ratings
5% above category average
IBM Maximo Application Suite
-
Ratings
Proposal Management7.44 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management7.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Epicor KineticIBM Maximo Application Suite
Small Businesses
Acumatica
Acumatica
Score 8.8 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.2 out of 10
Qualys TruRisk Platform
Qualys TruRisk Platform
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP Business ByDesign
SAP Business ByDesign
Score 7.4 out of 10
Qualys TruRisk Platform
Qualys TruRisk Platform
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Epicor KineticIBM Maximo Application Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
8.1
(39 ratings)
8.0
(42 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
7.6
(4 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
7.3
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(2 ratings)
7.0
(3 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.5
(15 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
7.6
(14 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Epicor KineticIBM Maximo Application Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
Epicor Software
Epicor is an excellent system for most manufacturing customers and offers several features previously only offered on the very large (e.g. Oracle, PeopleSoft, etc) level platforms. Yet the pricing is mid-level, and the expandability through additional modules provides a great opportunity for future business growth. The architecture is easily scalable, fast, and offers great options for both on premise and hosted systems. Epicor is flexible, and large enough that regular updates and enhancements continue to be adopted to improve functionality and effectiveness. It is however, not for everyone. Competition in this sector is very good, with several mid-level systems being available at a similar price point. If you are considering adopting a new ERP system and are in the plastics space, you also owe it to yourself and your team to consider IQMS, which is becoming a de-facto standard in this segment. Also, for specific medical sectors, you will find that Epicor software validation for CFR Part 11 compliance can be quite costly-- although the software is capable of supporting this with modification. Overall, Epicor is a solid choice. Ultimately, it will be up to your team to determine what works best for your needs. You won't be disappointed with Epicor if you do the due diligence and take the time needed to properly review and demo the product. Remember though, demos are typically "best case" staged, so be sure to throw several curveballs at your vendor and bring out the unique requirements of your business.
Read full review
IBM
IBM Maximo Application Suite is well suited for organizations looking for an application to track their end-to-end procurement and supply chain process. It can also be used for billing services, but that would mainly be for services provided as part of a work order, not voluminous customer billing. IBM Maximo Application Suite allows us to have one application where someone from procurement can input contracts and details, someone from any various department can create a requisition and superiors can use automated workflow to approve a purchase order, and someone at an operations location can receive and store materials. Subsequently, someone in the field can submit their hours and material used and it be approved via automated workflow for an invoice to be created. Payment functionality is possible, but we did not implement this aspect of IBM Maximo Application Suite. To note, throughout the process, interfacing can be set up to send transactions to your general ledger. As far as interfacing, IBM Maximo Application Suite also offers tools and configuration to set up endpoints. We have been able to set up REST APIs and request/responses without heavy involvement from developers. This is a nice bonus if integrating with multiple applications.
Read full review
Pros
Epicor Software
  • Epicor has the best product configurator that I have seen on the market. This was one of the main reasons we went with Epicor, and have not been disappointed at all.
  • Epicor is also one of the easiest ERP system to learn, and has many ways for users to get training. Epicor University, on-line courses, or class room settings, also user conference every year, and user support groups.
  • The Enterprise search ability in Epicor is great, can find parts, customers, suppliers, etc. so easily. And if you can't remember where a report or task that you want to do is on the menu, you can search for that also.
Read full review
IBM
  • Delivers Out-of-Box solutions for various industries without the need for customization and configuration
  • Modules and Applications are well developed and linked in an orderly way, with proper documentation and help guides that allow end users to start using the system with ease
  • Powerful Work Management, Contracts, Inventory, and Purchasing applications and features that are a better match to other ERP applications today
Read full review
Cons
Epicor Software
  • Consultants should be very well trained to make sure program integrity is maintained during challenging implementations.
  • There should be an improvement on answering questions raised, especially upon migration issues.
  • When is Epicor aware of improper/incorrect implementation they might proactively offer improvement support?
Read full review
IBM
  • Hard to implement. A high number of resources and manpower is necessary to implement and upgrade IBM Maximo due to its robustness and number of functionalities.
  • Version fragmentation. Due to the challenge imposed by a version upgrade, it is common to find systems relying on legacy versions of Maximo which might become a challenge for the support team.
  • Unfriendly UI. The excess of functionalities and services available might become a challenge for a starting user. Although it is possible to customize the UI to fit the exact needs of each user, it is important to map exactly what each user needs.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Epicor Software
No answers on this topic
IBM
The versatility, strength, and value that IBM Maximo adds to our company's asset management procedures. The platform has greatly increased operational efficiency and asset performance by streamlining jobs, automating procedures, and offering customizable solutions. Furthermore, IBM's constant assistance and updates have been crucial in meeting changing company requirements. Though there's always potential for improvement.
Read full review
Usability
Epicor Software
It is a good service to have people update and collaborate with I also like the ease of it. It keeps the stock of materials accountable
Read full review
IBM
The gui screens in IBM Maximo Application Suite are not overly cluttered with options to click and navigate to new areas. That is, the display is more of a layout of fields that the user can either input data or just interpret what is on the screen. For those in IT, there is even a feature (press Alt+F1) that will show you the exact table and column of any field selected.
Read full review
Support Rating
Epicor Software
If the answer to your problem is not readily available in an answer book, your response or solution will take months, if you get one at all. Problems need to be sent to support and duplicated by them before they try to fix it. This is extremely frustrating because you have to prove to Epicor that you are having an issue. If by some miracle you get by this barrier, your problem is submitted to development for review. You can't speak to them or communicate in any way directly. This group appears to be completely unconcerned about user issues or customer service. Our experiences have been negative across the board.
Read full review
IBM
I have regularly contacted IBM Support to report issues and raise requests for issues we face during project implementations. The response from them has overall been good and to the point, and they get back to us within a day or 2 and guide us through the process of fixing it or providing an interim fix of the product
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Epicor Software
Everyone at our organization really appreciated "made 2 manage" because of all of the quick access and some of the capabilities in accounting. So far, Epicor is much more advanced but the two can stand side by side. These two programs cannot really be compared just because it's just not fair to compare an on-site server ERP system to a cloud-based one.
Read full review
IBM
As a computerized maintenance management system i do not have experience of any other system. The only experience I have is for Maximo and it works excellent for me. I am using many modules available in Maximo and all of these modules are almost fulfilling all of my business needs.
Read full review
Scalability
Epicor Software
The software is pretty easy to use. Things are pretty clear on how to do them and if you don't know how to do something they have instructions on how to do them or you get an error code telling you exactly what to do. I have been satisfied with my overall experience.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Epicor Software
  • The ROI can be hard to quantify. We spend more time setting up and entering information up front, but we spend less time than before trying to track project costs so that evens out. Purchasing the system and implementing it was very expensive, but the benefit is the the better information can save money on projects as we know where best to spend our time and identify potential problems earlier on a project. We believe it will have a positive impact, but I'd say it will take a few years (3-4) to be worth it.
Read full review
IBM
  • Need multiple IT developers and DBA's to run the software at an enterprise level.
  • We use it for logging and taking repair work orders, handling of parts orders, and fulfillment and job scheduling.
  • The desktop version is very easy to use
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Maximo Application Suite Screenshots

Screenshot of Reliability Strategies, and its supporting content library. IBM Maximo Application Suite integrates computerized maintenance management system (CMMS), enterprise asset management (EAM), asset performance management (APM) and now RCM in one single platform, accelerated by a failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) and job plan library.Screenshot of where the appropriate ITSM information is gathered in one place, so that service teams will have a better ticketing system, an improved IT service delivery and a more responsive incident management system, as well as a better configuration management.