Expenzing Supplier Portal vs. Salesforce Partner Management

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Expenzing Supplier Portal
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
The Expenzing Supplier Portal is a digital workspace for suppliers to view information during execution of a contract, submit invoices, and track payment status. Suppliers can view Purchase Orders (POs) and plan deliveries accordingly. Once deliveries are made, they are able to view Goods Received Notes (GRN) and prompt customers to complete a broad range of actions. The Supplier Portal is designed to work alongside medium and large enterprises in Banking, Financial Services,…N/A
Salesforce Partner Management
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Salesforce Partner Management is a partner relationship management (PRM) software solution offered by Salesforce.
$25
per month per user
Pricing
Expenzing Supplier PortalSalesforce Partner Management
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Essentials
$25
per month per user
Professional
$75
per month per user
Enterprise
$150
per month per user
Unlimited
$300
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Expenzing Supplier PortalSalesforce Partner Management
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsAll plans are billed annually.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Expenzing Supplier PortalSalesforce Partner Management
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
Expenzing Supplier PortalSalesforce Partner Management
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Salesforce Experience Cloud
Salesforce Experience Cloud
Score 8.4 out of 10
Salesforce Experience Cloud
Salesforce Experience Cloud
Score 8.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Salesforce Experience Cloud
Salesforce Experience Cloud
Score 8.4 out of 10
Salesforce Experience Cloud
Salesforce Experience Cloud
Score 8.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Expenzing Supplier PortalSalesforce Partner Management
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
8.5
(13 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Expenzing Supplier PortalSalesforce Partner Management
Likelihood to Recommend
Expenzing
Well suited in scenarios where customer does not have any tool in place and wants to digitize the buyer as well as supplier experience. Especially helpful in scenarios where you need a common portal for all their suppliers Less appropriate in scenarios where customer is digitally matured and is looking for advance AI/ML capabilities
Read full review
Salesforce
Salesforce Partner Management is a great tool for scenarios where a partner portal needs to be created in a quick and cost-efficient manner by teams that do not necessarily have a broad technical knowledge and when the time to market is key. In the situations where the use case is more advanced and cannot be covered by the out-of-the-box functionalities of SPM, then the tool is less effective.
Read full review
Pros
Expenzing
  • It provides a self service portal where direct as well as indirect suppliers can update their profile, participate in contracts, submit PO acknowledgement and invoices
  • Suppliers have complete visibility on their invoice status & payments
Read full review
Salesforce
  • Clear, concise user interface.
  • Organizes calls & notes & client info into one uniform platform.
  • Allows knowledge to be shared across the organization & account teams.
Read full review
Cons
Expenzing
  • Overall look & feel and usability of the portal
  • Need to bring is some RPAs and bots in place to automate the invoicing process and make it a touchless processing
  • Should have the ability to validate supplier profile details
Read full review
Salesforce
  • One thing is, you have to put the time you took on the case if you edited it. I would like to change the name or a note and not have to go back and put how long it took.
  • Reports can sometimes be hard to create.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Expenzing
No answers on this topic
Salesforce
We are definitely going to renew as we created and developed a very functional and complete solution that we won't want to lose. and the reason we achieved that is by continuously evolving and enhancing. That would not be possible without the qualified technical support we have at our disposal internally.
Read full review
Usability
Expenzing
No answers on this topic
Salesforce
Salesforce Partner Management is complete and has great usability. Just as a Salesforce full CRM does. However, when you have to deploy the initial implementation and/or create the infrastructure for your Salesforce Partner Management it might require, as expected, a very good support and development team and resources
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Expenzing
Expenzing Supplier Portal has a very lucrative pricing model and is essential for companies that are not completely matured in their digital procurement journey. Although I was not directly involved in the selection of this portal, what I really like about this tool is support provided to my suppliers and suppliers can complete all their sourcing and procurement activities from one single portal.
Read full review
Salesforce
Tune provides great on-boarding experience for new users, but the functionality of the product itself is limited. For example if you multiple partners worldwide who sell your product, Salesforce CRM integration is a must to achieve business goals. Salesforce ecosystems helps to avoid having multiple tools and licenses. One big differentiator is that Salesforce Partner Managements allows for personalization that is user-friendly, while with Tune user is expected to do some coding
Read full review
Return on Investment
Expenzing
  • Increased spend under management
  • More # of suppliers transacting electronically
  • Reduced invoices in exceptions
Read full review
Salesforce
  • Single integrated lead management system- positive.
  • Partner information and communication - positive.
  • One system for all partner needs like assigning deal registration or MDF- positive.
  • Trainings required internally- negative.
  • Too expensive- negative.
Read full review
ScreenShots