inriver PIM vs. Unbxd PIM

inRiver [PIM] is pretty easy to use. I can see a company with a more narrow product selection benefiting from this PIM. The challenge comes with the more SKUs and categories the company offers. Without our 3rd party implementor creating specialized imports for us, we would be having a difficult time managing mass data updates.

Incentivized

Best scenarios: To explain to the customers how the product works in searching any operation and to give the demo to customers. Less appropriate: To describe the customers in a very short span of time.

• Scalability
• Data Integrations
• Workflow

Incentivized

• Auto suggest widgets
• Visual workbench
• A/B testing

• Missing the ability to be able to right click an item/product to open in a new tab
• Mass Asset/SKU management is not an out-of-the-box feature
• Shared folders area - few options to create a specialized area that you can block other users from deleting

Incentivized

• Animated toons
• Some short video explanations
• Fast and ready suggestions

inRiver has been both helpful and responsive to our needs. Their customer service and ticketing system are top-notch - timely communications and followup

Incentivized

When I compared these other PIM platforms, I found several were not true PIM systems. Although they solved for some significant syndication challenges, they did not have the ability to build a relational databased across products and categories. Furthermore, the interface is much more user-friendly and the ability to engage the entire team with workflow is a big plus!

Incentivized

They have some good graphics and displays for overall reports. Reports and data analytics reports are having good insights into all the data. The reports are enough to calculate each time series analysis.

• Quicker go-to-market
• Improved templates for customer data
• Scalable for our growing organization

Incentivized

• Positive impact: Reports , Speed of report generation.
• Negative feature: AI feature : sometimes it didn't work.