Junos Network Operating System (Junos OS) vs. Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Junos OS
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
Junos is a network operating system, from Juniper Networks.N/A
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Red Hat Enterprise Linux is a Linux distribution mainly used in commercial data centers.N/A
Pricing
Junos Network Operating System (Junos OS)Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Junos OSRed Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Junos Network Operating System (Junos OS)Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Features
Junos Network Operating System (Junos OS)Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Operating System
Comparison of Operating System features of Product A and Product B
Junos Network Operating System (Junos OS)
-
Ratings
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
8.4
78 Ratings
4% below category average
File Management00 Ratings8.073 Ratings
Software Application Management00 Ratings8.075 Ratings
System Update Frequency00 Ratings8.276 Ratings
Operating System Security00 Ratings9.378 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Junos Network Operating System (Junos OS)Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Ubuntu
Ubuntu
Score 8.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

Ubuntu
Ubuntu
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco NX-OS
Cisco NX-OS
Score 8.0 out of 10
Ubuntu
Ubuntu
Score 8.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Junos Network Operating System (Junos OS)Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
8.9
(302 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(3 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(194 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(9 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(3 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Junos Network Operating System (Junos OS)Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Likelihood to Recommend
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
Juniper Operating systems are well suited for distribution and edge networks. When we evaluated them for a proposal to core networks we decided to go with other vendors, as the processing capacity of core routers was lower. Typical environments Junos OS has fit in our organization are enterprise, customer edge, distribution networks.
Read full review
Red Hat
There's a lot of things that can and can't be discussed. But as I mentioned earlier, cloud computing and on-prem, and very much like in the cloud, having a standard image ISO, deploying that, the configurations with Ansible or packages installed via Ansible, instead of just a Kickstart script, you have a set of scripts that run in a pipeline that deploy Red Hat. So I'd say the environments, every time I've used Red Hat Enterprise Linux as a computing solution has been, like I mentioned, reusable, scalable, positive. And I don't think I've ever found any situations where I wish I were using something other than Red Hat Enterprise Linux, because the support is not there for anything else as much as it is for Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Read full review
Pros
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
  • BGP auto-peering
  • Juniper ATP cloud for threat profiling
  • Segment Routing algorithms allows customization
Read full review
Red Hat
  • Virtualization, like the operating system level task. I see this product is very good and it blends very well with the middleware components like all the JBoss and other things. And other than that, either you install it or a virtual machine or physical servers, it works seamlessly anywhere. And if you want to go further, like Red Hat OpenShift or those things also work very nice with it.
Read full review
Cons
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
  • GUI has come a long way, but can be improved
  • SDN features
  • Training, documentations and online discussion forums can be improved.
Read full review
Red Hat
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) needs better built-in developer-centric tooling.
  • The desktop experience is too barebones, which makes it less attractive for developer workstations.
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) needs to be integrated and available in GItHub Actions as a supported platform so code developed on GitHub can be tested and qualified there.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
We find RHEL to be a superior OS with stable operations and long life. It is also easier to use and fix then most other OS's.
Read full review
Usability
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
It's pretty intuitive and easy to use. Everything is adjustable; everything is customizable through a set of yaml's and everything can be undone and re-done. Doing items such a modification and restarting the single app doesnt take down the whole operating system like one of the more popular GUI based operating systems. We can work on live production systems without breaking into a sweat.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
Product support and regular patches.
Read full review
Performance
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
As with any OS enhanced testing will need to be done prior to application integration.
Read full review
Support Rating
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
Red Hat support has really come a long way in the last 10 years, The general support is great, and the specialized product support teams are extremely knowledgeable about their specific products. Response time is good and you never need to escalate.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
Don't be afraid of it, its easy to install and configure for the tasks needed.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
We have stuck to iOS for datacenter networks for many years due to familiarity and ease of use. Junos OS is well suited for business customers, due to cost-effectiveness and not frequent changes to end routers. Junos OS is very comparable to its competitors, but it bit behind on core layer solutions.
Read full review
Red Hat
Windows Server can take a long time to patch, waiting for the patch to install, then waiting to apply, after the OS is rebooted it can also take additional time to apply the update. Often times Windows Server patches can fail, leading to long troubleshooting times and application outages. Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Patching is extremely quick, I've honestly not seen a Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) update fail to install in many years of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) patching.
Read full review
Scalability
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
Operational ease of use backed by support
Read full review
Return on Investment
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
  • Junos OS is cost effective
  • Uptime is impressive and has proven availability
  • Lack of training among employees has made it harder for few teams to troubleshoot
Read full review
Red Hat
  • It has done wonders for my career because I come from a Linux background, HPUX, Solaris and AIX. So made this transition to Linux 20 years ago. So it has really put my career at the forefront of what we do in the company. We're still primarily a window shop, but with Red Hat and what they're doing with the Kubernetes integration with OpenShift, with the East Satellite Management, the Ansible stuff, all based on Red Hat. It's taken off at my company and we're very happy about it.
Read full review
ScreenShots