KROCK vs. XWiki

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
KROCK
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
KROCK is designed to help users manage creative projects effectively and painlessly. Krock offers tools for creative teams to manageme the review and approval process: build project pipelines assigns teammates for different tasks within different projects create storyboards share different types of files add visual comments on any media files create a limitless number of…
$0
per team
XWiki
Score 8.4 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
XWiki is an open-source collaborative platform designed to enhance business collaboration and streamline knowledge management for companies of all sizes. As a an alternative to proprietary knowledge bases, XWiki offers a structured second-generation wiki with over 900 pre-made extensions, enabling businesses to add features and customize their XWiki instance to meet specific needs. This level of customization enhances the collaborative environment and operational efficiency. Key…
$12
per month 10 users
Pricing
KROCKXWiki
Editions & Modules
Trial
$0
per team
Plus
$69
per team
Pro
$99
per team
Solo
9,99
per user
Enterprise
Custom
per team
Standard
€12
per month 10 users
Pro Silver
€35
per month 10 users
Pro Gold
€575
per month 10 users
Pro Platinum
€1150
per month 10 users
On-Premise
Custom Pricing
(Pro Plans available for On-Premise deployment)
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
KROCKXWiki
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsSave 20% on any plans, when you choose annual billing17% discount available for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
KROCKXWiki
Top Pros
Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
KROCKXWiki
Small Businesses
Frame.io
Frame.io
Score 9.0 out of 10
Front
Front
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Asana
Asana
Score 8.5 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Wrike
Wrike
Score 8.2 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
KROCKXWiki
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
KROCKXWiki
Likelihood to Recommend
KROCK
I would recommend KROCK to those in the creative industry who struggle with keeping client communication neat, missing deadlines, and spending too much time on project management rather than focusing on their result. KROCK is a good backend system for the creative process.
Read full review
XWiki SAS
XWiki is very well suited for a very wide range of web collaboration and web development.
Read full review
Pros
KROCK
  • Good usability--for clients, the team, and freelancers
  • The feedback feature is useful--it reduced client communication errors substantially
  • Provides transparency and insight into the work process for my clients
  • Ability to create different versions and present each of them to the clients
  • Relevant step sequence and project dashboard
Read full review
XWiki SAS
  • XWiki makes it easy to manage semi-structured information, which is at the heart of every knowledge nexus of organizations. It makes it easy to manage in a single system both structured data (such as memberships, projects), and unstructured data.
  • XWiki offers a very rich API for creating enterprise applications quickly that are easy to maintain and evolve collaboratively.
  • XWiki templating and skinning system is extremely flexible and powerful.
Read full review
Cons
KROCK
No answers on this topic
XWiki SAS
  • While the basic pieces are available for turning XWiki into an advanced semantic system, some features could be made available more prominently to the user for easing the use of faceted and typed links, paving the way for a new era of collaborative knowledge sharing.
Read full review
Support Rating
KROCK
There is an online support chat available. And the KROCK team reached out to me for detailed feedback on the platform and suggestions for improvements, which is truly considerate of them. They are always very kind, positive, and easy to ask for help, which is a pleasure.
Read full review
XWiki SAS
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
KROCK
Easier to use for our clients, which is important, as many of our clients only use the application for a short time and don't care to invest too much time or energy to learn the features. It has a clean and reliable dashboard and overall user interface.
Read full review
XWiki SAS
XWiki key differentiators in my opinion:
  • Fast app development framework with very rich API
  • Open-source strategy, opening the way to collaborative innovation
Read full review
Return on Investment
KROCK
  • Saves a lot of time in communication, documentation, and project management
Read full review
XWiki SAS
  • XWiki has a positive impact on the OW2 communication and collaborations strategies. It saves time when developing applications.
Read full review
ScreenShots

KROCK Screenshots

Screenshot of Build a custom pipeline for every project you manage, using a visual board with all the steps, assignees, due dates, and deliverables.Screenshot of Visualize everything in one place: deadlines, team progress on every task, and client reviews.Screenshot of Keep up with all the workload and adjust your schedule. Work better, deliver faster.Screenshot of Tap on an image or video and share your comments with your team or client.Screenshot of Forget about an endless thread of emails and messages from your clients and team members.Screenshot of Create limitless workspaces for different teams and clients. Get invited to someone´s workspaces as a member or freelancer.

XWiki Screenshots

Screenshot of an XWiki homepageScreenshot of knowledge management, in XWiki.Screenshot of the granular rights access feature, that helps users to manage big teams.Screenshot of some of the customizations available in every aspect of an instance, from theme to templates and page structure.Screenshot of an example of migration from Confluence using the dedicated migrator.