Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Looker
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Looker is a BI application with an analytics-oriented application server that sits on top of relational data stores. It includes an end-user interface for exploring data, a reusable development paradigm for data discovery, and an API for supporting data in other systems.N/A
MS SharePoint / SQL
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
MS SharePoint / SQL refers to Microsoft Sharepoint, a web-based collaborative platform, being used in tandem with Microsoft SQL Server to provide business intelligence analytics and reporting. They can provide BI content such as data connections, reports, scorecards, dashboards, and more.N/A
Pricing
LookerMS SharePoint / SQL
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
LookerMS SharePoint / SQL
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredNo setup fee
Additional DetailsMust contact sales team for pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
LookerMS SharePoint / SQL
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
LookerMS SharePoint / SQL
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Looker
8.0
117 Ratings
2% below category average
MS SharePoint / SQL
7.2
62 Ratings
12% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports7.495 Ratings7.843 Ratings
Customizable dashboards8.7116 Ratings6.759 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates7.9100 Ratings7.252 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Looker
8.1
117 Ratings
1% above category average
MS SharePoint / SQL
7.1
57 Ratings
12% below category average
Drill-down analysis8.1113 Ratings6.546 Ratings
Formatting capabilities7.4115 Ratings8.057 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages8.147 Ratings5.334 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration8.7117 Ratings8.854 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Looker
8.5
113 Ratings
3% above category average
MS SharePoint / SQL
7.7
62 Ratings
7% below category average
Publish to Web8.295 Ratings7.655 Ratings
Publish to PDF8.8101 Ratings8.452 Ratings
Report Versioning8.276 Ratings7.452 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling8.998 Ratings7.542 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers00 Ratings7.535 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Looker
6.7
114 Ratings
16% below category average
MS SharePoint / SQL
6.5
40 Ratings
19% below category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)7.9110 Ratings5.738 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization7.597 Ratings6.035 Ratings
Predictive Analytics4.66 Ratings7.533 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining00 Ratings6.96 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Looker
8.3
113 Ratings
2% below category average
MS SharePoint / SQL
8.4
74 Ratings
1% below category average
Multi-User Support (named login)8.8106 Ratings8.664 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model8.093 Ratings8.468 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)8.2107 Ratings8.673 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control8.145 Ratings8.28 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings8.259 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Looker
5.8
84 Ratings
30% below category average
MS SharePoint / SQL
8.2
64 Ratings
5% above category average
Responsive Design for Web Access6.781 Ratings7.762 Ratings
Mobile Application5.01 Ratings7.341 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile6.575 Ratings7.642 Ratings
Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of Product A and Product B
Looker
-
Ratings
MS SharePoint / SQL
7.1
42 Ratings
9% below category average
REST API00 Ratings7.733 Ratings
Javascript API00 Ratings7.932 Ratings
iFrames00 Ratings6.331 Ratings
Java API00 Ratings6.728 Ratings
Themeable User Interface (UI)00 Ratings6.037 Ratings
Customizable Platform (Open Source)00 Ratings7.927 Ratings
Best Alternatives
LookerMS SharePoint / SQL
Small Businesses
Yellowfin
Yellowfin
Score 9.0 out of 10
Yellowfin
Yellowfin
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Jaspersoft Community Edition
Jaspersoft Community Edition
Score 9.7 out of 10
Jaspersoft Community Edition
Jaspersoft Community Edition
Score 9.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
LookerMS SharePoint / SQL
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(118 ratings)
8.1
(83 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.3
(8 ratings)
8.8
(7 ratings)
Usability
8.8
(12 ratings)
8.2
(18 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
6.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.8
(14 ratings)
8.8
(7 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
Configurability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Professional Services
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
LookerMS SharePoint / SQL
Likelihood to Recommend
Google
As a Sales, it suited me to use such well-developed software with a nice dashboard that could navigate between my prospects, visualize the numbers of clients, and check my achievements for each quarter. That would help me understand my performance and record the data I needed for myself as a salesperson.
Read full review
Microsoft
As I mentioned in my previous answers, MS SharePoint is very useful as a shared drive for the organization and is very easy to manage. It also helps us import data from SharePoint directly into PowerBI for creating reports. According to my understanding, only share link features should be improved.
Read full review
Pros
Google
  • Show visited pages - sessions, pageviews - which programs are viewed the most.
  • Displays session source/medium views to see where users are coming from.
  • It shows the video titles, URLs, and event counts so we can monitor the performance of our videos.
  • It gives a graphic face to the numbers, such as using bar charts, pie graphs, and other charts to show user trends or which channels are driving engagement.
  • Our clients like to see the top pages visited for a month.
  • I like the drop-and-drag approach, and building charts is a little easier than it was before.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Flexible - able to make any changes we would like vs traditional service desk system.
  • ROI - We were already using SharePoint for internal intranet, so we are simply getting more use out of licensing we had already committed to.
  • Easy to use for end users.
Read full review
Cons
Google
  • I wish I could get more granular in the Google ad data, such as down to the campaign type, instead of having to see only all campaigns.
  • The setup can be time-consuming if you're not using the product regularly.
  • Editing the dashboard requires a few logins; I wish it was more seamless.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • It is hard to setup and nightmare
  • It requires a of infrastructure, thus it could be costly because of requirement and licensing required for everything to run smoothly
  • If it is not setup and organized properly from the beginning it could be maintenance nightmare
  • It is hard to have "test" environment to do patches or similar
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Google
I give it this rating because it deems as effective, I am able to complete majority of my tasks using this app. It is very helpful when analyzing the data provided and shown in the app and it's just overall a great app for Operational use, despite the small hiccups it has (live data).
Read full review
Microsoft
This was a long-term buy-in from a corporate perspective, to remain in the SharePoint space. Migration is certainly possible, which is good for planning and having options further out. At this point, the only planned migration is to eventually move the architecture up to SharePoint/SQL 2013. At that point, we will be able to leverage some greater efficiencies, some enhanced content design and management features, and some more current social features. It is well worth a full consideration in any shop looking at a new implementation of or migration to SharePoint (although you will probably be considering 2013 versions or beyond in those discussions), but the platform should be a strong competitor to any alternatives. Realizing the capability of a fully-branded and customized website was not part of the original choice for the architecture at Lincoln, but seeing it implemented and functioning now with this capacity far beyond original expectations has certainly cemented plans to continue using it.
Read full review
Usability
Google
Looker is relatively easy to use, even as it is set up. The customers for the front-end only have issues with the initial setup for looker ml creations. Other "looks" are relatively easy to set up, depending on the ETL and the data which is coming into Looker on a regular basis.
Read full review
Microsoft
I gave this rating due to MS SharePoint being a big help with our userbase. We have a lot of users that are just old enough to not have much technical skills or they have been in this industry long enough to where they haven't really needed to utilize much technology. MS SharePoint helped us move beyond that barrier without too many bumps and bruises.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Google
No objections
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Performance
Google
Somehow resources heavy, both on server and client. I recommned at least 50Mbs data rate and high performance desktop comouter to be abke to run comolex tasks and configure larger amount of data. On the other hand, the client does not need to worry when viewing, the performance is usually ok
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Google
Never had to work with support for issues. Any questions we had, they would respond promptly and clearly. The one-time setup was easy, by reading documentation. If the feature is not supported, they will add a feature request. In this case, LDAP support was requested over OKTA. They are looking into it.
Read full review
Microsoft
I've only had to call in to support on one occasion but they were able to work though our issue and find a solution that did fully resolve the issue in a timely manner. I can't always say the same about support from other companies so it was a refreshing change to have support that did help.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Google
Very satisfied, easy to implement
Read full review
Microsoft
Not implemented in best practice way, there are many customizations
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Google
Looker gives you options to integrate external APIs with great ease. Our data analytics team is able to easily use multiple data sources as input to the Looker dashboard, and everything is consolidated in one single Dashboard. You also have an option for Shared folders to be accessed by multiple people. The reporting system is perfect and has a wide range of options/reporting options that can be implemented.
Read full review
Microsoft
At the time of the two large projects, SharePoint was the enterprise solution so we were required to use that. We have since lobbied the enterprise teams to review and consider Atlassian Confluence and were successful. Confluence is cheaper than Sharepoint which is why we wanted to bring that in. The enterprise has now made Confluence an enterprise solution as an alternative to SharePoint. After using both I think SharePoint has many more add-ins than Confluence. It has much more customization ability than Confluence. SharePoint is not good for mobile readiness. Confluence is so there is a difference that might lead you to Confluence over SharePoint. I would also say that SharePoint is very document-centric and that Confluence has better KM than SharePoint does. even with the use of SQL Server. We were told that we could not use Google Drive even though it had features we liked.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Google
Perfect price to performance
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Google
  • Looker has a poignant impact on our business's ROI objectives. As an advertising exchange we have specific goals for daily requests and fill, and having premade Looks to monitor this is an integral piece of our operational capability
  • To facilitate an efficient monthly billing cycle in our organization, Looker is essential to track estimated revenue and impression delivery by publisher. Without the Looks we have set up, we would spend considerably more time and effort segmenting revenue by vertical.
  • Looker's unique value proposition is making analytical tools more digestible to people without conventional analytical experience. Other competing tools like Tableau require considerably more training and context to successfully use, and the ability to easily plot different visualizations is one of its greatest selling points.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • ROI for ms SharePoint/SQL considering that is the best database engine with excellent features that help you to have all information in your hand.
  • Something negative could be license format.
  • These are the best relational databases in the market with powerful features that complement your system.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Looker Screenshots

Screenshot of a Looker dashboard with a geo chart.