Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. Oracle E-Business Suite

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Score 5.1 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.N/A
Oracle E-Business Suite
Score 6.4 out of 10
N/A
Oracle E-Business Suite is a comprehensive suite of integrated, global business applications. The suite includes cross-industry capabilities spanning ERP, CRM and supply chain planning.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle E-Business Suite
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle E-Business Suite
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle E-Business Suite
Considered Both Products
Microsoft Dynamics GP

No answer on this topic

Oracle E-Business Suite
Chose Oracle E-Business Suite
Oracle E-Business Suite provides a wider variety of solutions and better stability. Sage and Orion are more user-friendly. MS Dynamics GP is easier to implement but lacks robustness. If the cost is a major factor in the solution selection process, then Oracle EBS ranks lowest …
Features
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle E-Business Suite
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.4
20 Ratings
17% below category average
Oracle E-Business Suite
6.6
31 Ratings
11% below category average
Pay calculation6.319 Ratings3.029 Ratings
Benefit plan administration5.915 Ratings5.024 Ratings
Direct deposit files7.518 Ratings8.024 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management6.517 Ratings00 Ratings
Reimbursement management6.016 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.3
27 Ratings
55% below category average
Oracle E-Business Suite
5.6
70 Ratings
28% below category average
API for custom integration2.526 Ratings3.070 Ratings
Plug-ins6.021 Ratings2.053 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
7.0
40 Ratings
16% below category average
Oracle E-Business Suite
3.0
73 Ratings
94% below category average
Single sign-on capability5.932 Ratings3.067 Ratings
Role-based user permissions8.240 Ratings3.072 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.4
41 Ratings
37% below category average
Oracle E-Business Suite
4.0
66 Ratings
59% below category average
Dashboards3.529 Ratings5.043 Ratings
Standard reports6.239 Ratings4.064 Ratings
Custom reports6.539 Ratings3.064 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.1
48 Ratings
40% below category average
Oracle E-Business Suite
7.1
81 Ratings
8% below category average
Accounts payable6.445 Ratings6.777 Ratings
Accounts receivable5.936 Ratings7.175 Ratings
Cash management6.436 Ratings00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation5.741 Ratings00 Ratings
Expense management4.531 Ratings00 Ratings
Time tracking8.014 Ratings00 Ratings
Fixed asset management4.628 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-currency support2.919 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-division support3.026 Ratings00 Ratings
Regulations compliance3.314 Ratings00 Ratings
Electronic tax filing9.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-service portal7.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Global Financial Support6.07 Ratings8.951 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers4.721 Ratings9.063 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting3.918 Ratings00 Ratings
Localizations4.513 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations4.726 Ratings7.165 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting2.916 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting4.117 Ratings6.156 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework3.814 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes6.219 Ratings6.158 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.6
26 Ratings
46% below category average
Oracle E-Business Suite
4.7
54 Ratings
51% below category average
Inventory tracking6.224 Ratings6.753 Ratings
Automatic reordering1.013 Ratings2.037 Ratings
Location management4.018 Ratings2.042 Ratings
Manufacturing module4.515 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
3.7
25 Ratings
68% below category average
Oracle E-Business Suite
7.5
56 Ratings
4% below category average
Pricing3.618 Ratings4.050 Ratings
Order entry3.621 Ratings7.052 Ratings
Credit card processing1.012 Ratings8.040 Ratings
Cost of goods sold5.225 Ratings7.050 Ratings
Order Orchestration5.39 Ratings8.936 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility3.812 Ratings00 Ratings
Order exception Resolution3.47 Ratings00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle E-Business Suite
8.0
67 Ratings
7% above category average
Billing Management00 Ratings6.547 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management00 Ratings6.156 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management00 Ratings6.049 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting00 Ratings3.040 Ratings
Period Close00 Ratings7.160 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle E-Business Suite
7.8
41 Ratings
3% above category average
Budgeting and Forecasting00 Ratings8.032 Ratings
Project Costing00 Ratings8.041 Ratings
Cost Capture00 Ratings8.034 Ratings
Capital Project Management00 Ratings8.132 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance00 Ratings8.124 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition00 Ratings8.031 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle E-Business Suite
6.4
21 Ratings
9% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling00 Ratings2.019 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers00 Ratings2.019 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality00 Ratings3.017 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools00 Ratings6.016 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle E-Business Suite
7.4
25 Ratings
0% below category average
Award Lifecycle Management00 Ratings3.021 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle E-Business Suite
6.8
51 Ratings
3% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared00 Ratings2.028 Ratings
Contract Authoring00 Ratings2.027 Ratings
Contract Repository00 Ratings4.020 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated00 Ratings2.037 Ratings
Supplier Management00 Ratings3.033 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle E-Business Suite
6.6
13 Ratings
0% below category average
Risk Repository00 Ratings6.011 Ratings
Control Management00 Ratings8.011 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments00 Ratings4.011 Ratings
Issue Detection00 Ratings5.012 Ratings
Remediation and Certification00 Ratings8.013 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle E-Business Suite
5.6
21 Ratings
20% below category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization00 Ratings3.018 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management00 Ratings2.017 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management00 Ratings4.017 Ratings
Fulfillment Management00 Ratings4.017 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management00 Ratings2.017 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle E-Business Suite
6.0
27 Ratings
21% below category average
Production Process Design00 Ratings4.022 Ratings
Production Management00 Ratings3.025 Ratings
Configuration Management00 Ratings4.023 Ratings
Work Execution00 Ratings7.024 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs00 Ratings4.025 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle E-Business Suite
5.7
33 Ratings
23% below category average
Forecasting00 Ratings4.030 Ratings
Inventory Planning00 Ratings4.033 Ratings
Performance Monitoring00 Ratings6.026 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle E-Business Suite
6.7
16 Ratings
8% below category average
Proposal Management00 Ratings2.013 Ratings
Product Master Data Management00 Ratings3.012 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle E-Business Suite
Small Businesses
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Score 6.1 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Zoho Books
Zoho Books
Score 9.1 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.4 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP Cloud ERP
SAP Cloud ERP
Score 8.6 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle E-Business Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
6.0
(51 ratings)
7.1
(99 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.9
(7 ratings)
8.0
(10 ratings)
Usability
6.0
(7 ratings)
6.2
(4 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(2 ratings)
3.0
(2 ratings)
Performance
7.0
(1 ratings)
6.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(5 ratings)
6.0
(3 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
4.0
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.2
(3 ratings)
6.7
(4 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(1 ratings)
7.8
(2 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
4.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle E-Business Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Microsoft Dynamics GP is well-suited for our environment, as we pay a diverse group of employees, including on-the-road drivers, shop employees (some in other locations), and office employees. It easily tracks time off, taxes, pay, etc. The reporting allows us to verify with our drivers how they are paid each week, whether it be through mileage or stop-offs.
Read full review
Oracle
Oracle Cash and Treasury Management fill the gaps in treasury management with features that are very helpful in building the modern financial system that we so desperately need. It may not be the most intuitive tool on the treasury market, but with a little more practice time, important expense analysis can be achieved. I am confident in this treasury tool for this year 2022 and I would like to recommend it to other companies so that they can also have a better administration.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Great Plains started as back office/accounting, and that is still it's strong suit.
  • SQL and the GP programming language, Dexterity, provide a robust, scalable, and stable platform with well documented maintenance and repair procedures. Relatively easy to manage, tune, and support.
  • Microsoft support for GP verges on "particularly well". Doesn't quite get there but good enough once you know what you're doing
  • Strong partner network, including the GP User Group (GPUG)
Read full review
Oracle
  • The EBS Oracle Order Management and Shipping Execution solution allows the creation of an integrated, seamless order-to-cash process and accurately capture of customer orders across multiple channels.
  • Orchestration of order details for seamless fulfillment execution.
  • Efficient shipment planning and confirmation.
  • Communication of order status information to customers throughout the order lifecycle.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • With respect to the allocations, once the expense is entered into the allocation account, you lose the ability to run any detail on just the total of the expense. It would be nice if you could run a trial balance on the allocation accounts the same way you can with regular accounts.
  • I've always thought security set up could be a bit simpler. It actually has gotten better through the years. Specifically, with eight separate entities, it would be nice to have a "master" setup where you could call up one group entity, assign the users rights, and then be finished. Currently, whenever I have a new user, I have to call up each individual entity and select all of the features I want the user to have. That means I have to do eight steps for each user.
Read full review
Oracle
  • Learning cure is a bit high for this product if you aren't already using a tool set like it.
  • finding where documents are stored can be tricky but once you find it you are golden.
  • Since I need a third one some of the API's need to be improved.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
Read full review
Oracle
After almost 5 years, we have a full control of this ERP System. We are able to implement new functionalities and modules without any major "consulting" expenses. As of today we are making almost 90% of the personalization/customization and implementation all in house. Once [it] is tuned, [it] keeps running very well with no major issues.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
Though it is a basic accounting package, I believe some users do not find the old style menus and navigation options intuitive. There is also a great lack of training resources in the market, so users have to learn the product without guidance a lot, resulting in inefficient workflows and misuse or misunderstanding of many features.
Read full review
Oracle
The various forms - like order entry forms that allow the uses to enter sales orders and the ability to personalize the views based on end user needs - are easy to use and follow standard business processes. The new release has a big focus on usability and forms now have a familiar web look and feel which has increased usability considerably.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Oracle
Because of the transactional nature of the system this software is available 24 X 7, and IT is responsible for making sure the system is available during normal business hours.
Read full review
Performance
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Oracle
The performance of the product is very good. Given the transactional nature of the system one of the key focus areas for IT is to make sure performance is not affected for internal reasons. This can also depend on the server configuration and setup. For example, performance on Exadata machine is far superior to other Linux custom systems that companies choose to deploy. In general though, as already pointed out, the platform is now very stable and has few bugs. Whenever there are any issues, the cause is usually customizations that we have made to the platform, rather than out-of-the-box standard functionality.
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
The rating is directed to the thrid party serive provider that we use. I do not now how good the Microsoft direct support is.
Read full review
Oracle
In general, support has not been great - particularly standard (non premium) support . The main issue is that our IT staff has been using this platform for years and is very knowledgeable Whenever something goes wrong, we usually have a very precise idea of what the problem is. We are skilled at problem diagnosis. But the Oracle support process is very rigid and slow. Typically, we are required to go through a lengthy diagnosis process where they ask us multiple questions sometimes over several days and we are obliged to talk to different people with differing levels of knowledge. Since we already know what the problem is, we really just want a patch or a bug fix, but it takes days to get there instead of minutes. This can be very frustrating. This is a big part of the reason why we pay for premium support. But it's still a bit disappointing.
Read full review
Online Training
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Oracle
The instructors are usually precise and knowledgable, and it's convenient to take online classes whenever available any day of the year.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
Read full review
Oracle
The key success factors for the implementation was project management, in-house expertise in IT and time. The implementation process started with the initial evaluation with the initial upgrade on a test system and mapping out the gaps and requirements. We did work with Oracle to understand the new functionality R12 had to offer and did another upgrade and researched solutions. With the use of software development cycle procedures there were conference room pilots with IT, business users. We then refined the project plan to the core key details, performed mock go-live implementations and finally upgraded the software. Overall, this was a very successful process.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
I come from a strong background of using SAP. SAP doesn't have the flexibility of GP, an example would be SAP doesn't allow core mods, if they catch you, you lose support. Microsoft doesn't really care about mods, but they will be quick to have the vendor you used support your issue if it is caused by those mods. With SAP your company adapts to the software, where with GP you adapt the software to you.
Read full review
Oracle
Oracle e-business suite is better than any other ERP because it is more user-friendly and can be operated by anyone even those who don't know how to run it. Also it has better APS, allowing you to better track costs and allocate resources more efficiently. Also, it has better event management, tracking, and Reporting.
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft
The functionality that GP and related ISV solutions offer and the ease of integration of GP to other systems makes it an extremely scalable solution
Read full review
Oracle
As I mentioned, it's a good tool but not the best
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP allows my clients to move from a paper or spreadsheet based company to an integrated, electronic, streamlined business. I love being able to help clients gain efficiencies through the use of Microsoft Dynamics GP.
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP allows for better customer service because everything is at our fingertips. If someone calls questioning an invoice, we can easily look it up. If someone calls stating they paid an invoice with a certain check number, we can quickly run a query to find that particular check number to see where it was applied.
  • Having everything on a single platform provides ease of use for upgrades, backups and end user training. There is only one software to learn!
Read full review
Oracle
  • We recently implemented Supplier Portal and Invoice Imaging Solution. This has reduced manual effort and increased speed and accuracy. There is no need for people to key in invoices manually now. Suppliers can flip a purchase order into invoice and Oracle will do all the validations and put the invoice on hold in case of any discrepancy.
  • Suppliers are very happy with the supplier portal as they can track the entire lifecycle of the invoice online.
  • With automation, we could bill all our customers on time. Oracle collects all the possible costs like payroll and expenses, adds markup, and bills our customers. We could track profitability and margins by project.
  • The period close and reporting has become easier and faster with this software. 3 people can close the periods now as opposed to 10 before.
Read full review
ScreenShots