MS SharePoint / SQL vs. Power Apps

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
MS SharePoint / SQL
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
MS SharePoint / SQL refers to Microsoft Sharepoint, a web-based collaborative platform, being used in tandem with Microsoft SQL Server to provide business intelligence analytics and reporting. They can provide BI content such as data connections, reports, scorecards, dashboards, and more.N/A
Power Apps
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
PowerApps is a low code / rapid application development product from Microsoft that allows users to quickly build apps.
$20
per month per user
Pricing
MS SharePoint / SQLPower Apps
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Power Apps Premium
$20
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
MS SharePoint / SQLPower Apps
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
MS SharePoint / SQLPower Apps
Considered Both Products
MS SharePoint / SQL
Chose MS SharePoint / SQL
1. Cost affective as it comes with MS 365 Tenant 2. Natively interactive with tools such MS 365 Dynamics ERP, Power Platform etc
Power Apps

No answer on this topic

Features
MS SharePoint / SQLPower Apps
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
MS SharePoint / SQL
7.3
66 Ratings
11% below category average
Power Apps
-
Ratings
Pixel Perfect reports7.547 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable dashboards7.363 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates7.056 Ratings00 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
MS SharePoint / SQL
7.1
61 Ratings
12% below category average
Power Apps
-
Ratings
Drill-down analysis6.450 Ratings00 Ratings
Formatting capabilities7.961 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages6.236 Ratings00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration8.158 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
MS SharePoint / SQL
7.5
66 Ratings
9% below category average
Power Apps
-
Ratings
Publish to Web7.459 Ratings00 Ratings
Publish to PDF7.955 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Versioning7.555 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling7.145 Ratings00 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers7.438 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
MS SharePoint / SQL
6.7
43 Ratings
17% below category average
Power Apps
-
Ratings
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)6.341 Ratings00 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization6.938 Ratings00 Ratings
Predictive Analytics7.136 Ratings00 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining6.69 Ratings00 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
MS SharePoint / SQL
8.6
78 Ratings
1% above category average
Power Apps
-
Ratings
Multi-User Support (named login)8.868 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model8.572 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)8.577 Ratings00 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control8.411 Ratings00 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)8.562 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
MS SharePoint / SQL
8.3
67 Ratings
6% above category average
Power Apps
-
Ratings
Responsive Design for Web Access7.865 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Application7.343 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile8.044 Ratings00 Ratings
Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of Product A and Product B
MS SharePoint / SQL
6.8
46 Ratings
12% below category average
Power Apps
-
Ratings
REST API7.436 Ratings00 Ratings
Javascript API7.235 Ratings00 Ratings
iFrames5.834 Ratings00 Ratings
Java API6.231 Ratings00 Ratings
Themeable User Interface (UI)6.841 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable Platform (Open Source)7.431 Ratings00 Ratings
Low-Code Development
Comparison of Low-Code Development features of Product A and Product B
MS SharePoint / SQL
-
Ratings
Power Apps
8.8
21 Ratings
4% above category average
Visual Modeling00 Ratings9.519 Ratings
Drag-and-drop Interfaces00 Ratings9.520 Ratings
Platform Security00 Ratings9.520 Ratings
Platform User Management00 Ratings9.020 Ratings
Reusability00 Ratings7.520 Ratings
Platform Scalability00 Ratings7.519 Ratings
Best Alternatives
MS SharePoint / SQLPower Apps
Small Businesses
Yellowfin
Yellowfin
Score 8.8 out of 10
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Score 9.5 out of 10
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
MS SharePoint / SQLPower Apps
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(87 ratings)
9.1
(23 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.8
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(22 ratings)
9.0
(4 ratings)
Support Rating
8.8
(7 ratings)
9.7
(6 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
MS SharePoint / SQLPower Apps
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
As I mentioned in my previous answers, MS SharePoint is very useful as a shared drive for the organization and is very easy to manage. It also helps us import data from SharePoint directly into PowerBI for creating reports. According to my understanding, only share link features should be improved.
Read full review
Microsoft
PowerApps is well suited for "quick-wins" and fast prototypes of business solutions. It also is beneficial for situations where business partners and developers work together - it allows the business folks to provide a "quick-and-dirty" prototype which is then fleshed-out by developers that are trained experts on the platform. The interactive and easy to understand representation of the solution allows business partners to "see" the solution and add, remove, or correct aspects of it themselves. It provides a common view and understanding of the actual solution across business units and tech teams. PowerApps, being a low-code\no-code platform is not well suited for business processes that require many complex computations or large amounts of custom code - such as solutions that are better architected as Web Site or "full-blown" desktop solutions. There are solutions that are just not easy or quick to accomplish in a low-code\no-code platform. Enterprise Architects should know the difference, however business partners often try to create a solution and only when stuck because it becomes too complex do they engage a tech team for assistance - at which point there are sunk-costs involved and hinderences to re-platforming the solution
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Flexible - able to make any changes we would like vs traditional service desk system.
  • ROI - We were already using SharePoint for internal intranet, so we are simply getting more use out of licensing we had already committed to.
  • Easy to use for end users.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Power Apps has formats that are pre-built that don't require any coding which makes it easier to achieve your vision. This does become a challenge if your App needs don't fit into that format.
  • We deal with a ton of data so the fact that you can connect to any data source in addition to their pre-stablished data connections makes the process a breeze.
  • The online learning resources and tutorials are helpful as well for those who are tech savvy.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • It is hard to setup and nightmare
  • It requires a of infrastructure, thus it could be costly because of requirement and licensing required for everything to run smoothly
  • If it is not setup and organized properly from the beginning it could be maintenance nightmare
  • It is hard to have "test" environment to do patches or similar
Read full review
Microsoft
  • More complicated to understand in comparison with Nintex Forms.
  • Complicated to find errors.
  • Using PowerApps for SharePoint Forms is a bit complicated by setting up the start and load scenario with a lot of JavaScript.
  • Load values, change them by code, and save them back could be easier. Actually quite complicated to handle a lot of variables.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
This was a long-term buy-in from a corporate perspective, to remain in the SharePoint space. Migration is certainly possible, which is good for planning and having options further out. At this point, the only planned migration is to eventually move the architecture up to SharePoint/SQL 2013. At that point, we will be able to leverage some greater efficiencies, some enhanced content design and management features, and some more current social features. It is well worth a full consideration in any shop looking at a new implementation of or migration to SharePoint (although you will probably be considering 2013 versions or beyond in those discussions), but the platform should be a strong competitor to any alternatives. Realizing the capability of a fully-branded and customized website was not part of the original choice for the architecture at Lincoln, but seeing it implemented and functioning now with this capacity far beyond original expectations has certainly cemented plans to continue using it.
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Usability
Microsoft
I gave this rating due to MS SharePoint being a big help with our userbase. We have a lot of users that are just old enough to not have much technical skills or they have been in this industry long enough to where they haven't really needed to utilize much technology. MS SharePoint helped us move beyond that barrier without too many bumps and bruises.
Read full review
Microsoft
PowerApps is a great solution and I have spent the last year familiarizing myself with the platform and building custom applications to complete a whole range of tasks such as asset management, custom invoice generation, and item restriction tracking. We as a company have barely begun to scratch the surface of what can be achieved with PowerApps.
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
I've only had to call in to support on one occasion but they were able to work though our issue and find a solution that did fully resolve the issue in a timely manner. I can't always say the same about support from other companies so it was a refreshing change to have support that did help.
Read full review
Microsoft
The community forums are extremely responsive to questions asked, there is a good body of online documentation and many community posts to draw from. Although the platform has changed, which means some of the posts are out of date and the solutions provided aren't relevant. Of relevance, I read over 400 articles plus documentation to get this first app built in SharePoint, move it to SQL and make it work exactly the way it should.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
Not implemented in best practice way, there are many customizations
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
At the time of the two large projects, SharePoint was the enterprise solution so we were required to use that. We have since lobbied the enterprise teams to review and consider Atlassian Confluence and were successful. Confluence is cheaper than Sharepoint which is why we wanted to bring that in. The enterprise has now made Confluence an enterprise solution as an alternative to SharePoint. After using both I think SharePoint has many more add-ins than Confluence. It has much more customization ability than Confluence. SharePoint is not good for mobile readiness. Confluence is so there is a difference that might lead you to Confluence over SharePoint. I would also say that SharePoint is very document-centric and that Confluence has better KM than SharePoint does. even with the use of SQL Server. We were told that we could not use Google Drive even though it had features we liked.
Read full review
Microsoft
Much cheaper, much more customizable, and easier to use. There is not much of a learning curve and the licensing cost is much cheaper. PowerApps does one thing very well, whereas other platforms are mediocre. There is much more customization possible for your in-house workflows that you can build yourself vs using NetSuite engineers to build it for you.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • ROI for ms SharePoint/SQL considering that is the best database engine with excellent features that help you to have all information in your hand.
  • Something negative could be license format.
  • These are the best relational databases in the market with powerful features that complement your system.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • It has given us a focal point for development. We now have the possibility of connecting to mobile and the default SharePoint online interface isn't always easy to manipulate. PowerApps has given us an opportunity to improve our user experience.
  • An improved user experience has given us a better shot at compliance. When users don't fight the environment, they don't gravitate towards workarounds or non-compliance.
  • As lists and libraries change, the platform scales pretty well.
  • Having users with the capability to create their own forms and tools has dialed back the app dev need (there is a balance though) and distributed power to the process architects and people who actually need the solutions in the first place—much more efficient model of service delivery: self-service.
Read full review
ScreenShots