Good but needs improvement !
Updated December 08, 2020

Good but needs improvement !

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Arena

We use Arena for quality control and is used across the whole organization. It helps us maintain our revision control and change control for effective backtracking of root cause and design verification and validation. It also helps us to keep check of equipment calibration and keep track of decisions pending approvals and helps maintain change control flow.
  • Ease of customization and to establish a Quality system
  • Excellent customer support
  • Easy formatting
  • Auto-generate numbers in a pattern
  • Templates for BOM creation
  • Integration with companies with different Quality system
  • We are developing a new product and it helps a lot to take care of version control.
  • Traceability for root cause analysis
  • Change control and approvals with E-signatures
  • Price
  • Product Features
  • Product Usability
  • Prior Experience with the Product
  • Vendor Reputation
  • Existing Relationship with the Vendor
Prior experience of the product was the most important reason. One of our contract engineering firms was using Arena and we thought it would be good for us to keep it consistent with them because we were just starting to set up quality system for the company. It was very important that we had a smooth transition between the companies.
Building and deploying Arena could be less intuitive. Introductory courses could help set up the system in a better way. An online tutorial to set up Arena from scratch could be helpful. It took a bit more time because of lack of resources who were familiar with Arena. An online tutorial of the whole setup procedure would be very helpful in educating people about setting up Arena.

Do you think Arena PLM and QMS delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Arena PLM and QMS's feature set?

Yes

Did Arena PLM and QMS live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of Arena PLM and QMS go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Arena PLM and QMS again?

Yes

Arena team has been very helpful in resolving our issues and the help section of arena is very helpful. the introductory sessions to help set up the arena has been really helpful. they have been consistently hosting arena training for new employees to learn on how to make the most out of arena and the price for which is pretty reasonable.
Arena has been good in terms of updating their software to make it more easy for the companies to use the tool to maintain their quality systems. It still has long ways to go to add additional functionalities that could make it easier to maintain a proper QMS .
This is the first time I'm using any quality management system. I had fun setting up Arena with my team and it was a very good learning experience.
As described in the cons section, the organization of the system can be more organized and made more intuitive to fix. Arena is well suited for small organizations to quickly implement quality control and develop flowcharts.

Using Arena

We use Arena for FDA regulatory efforts. It helps in revision control of SOPs and test procedures/ protocols and also to store the results from all the experiments which is important to maintain for FDA submissions. With recent improvements in arena it has been extremely convenient to update and maintain records for FDA product clearance.
We work in a medical device company which is considered essential in the current crisis. We have been working in office and the workflow hasn't changed. Arena is not a desktop tool but a browser based application which is very convenient to access from different devices. Even though it is a browser application it has been pretty consistent in keeping the server up to date and we haven't faced any issues with connectivity.
we have expanded arena to include customer complaints. We are a early stage startup with no product in the market yet but arena is a very flexible tool for personalization of the QMS specifically to ones needs. The expansion/ feature addition to the arena has been flawless with less difficulties.
Simplicity and ease of use would be the major drive factors to use arena again.
I haven't dealt with the customer success team from arena.

Lessons for Success

When I started with arena I was new to implementing quality management systems. The customer support and training has been an excellent source to set up your quality systems and helps you along the way. After you get used to as in any QMS Arena is a very straight forward tool for most of our needs.
We are using arena for our whole QMS. I am not sure if we are using it in any unusual way. It is helping us keep track of all the data. We work in medical devices field and QMS is one of the main requirements for the development. Arena seems sufficient to keep track to meet the FDA requirements.
Make use of customer service. They are extremely helpful and resourceful if you are trying to switch your QMS to arena. Make sure you play around in the test environment before implementing anything on the production environment. Take your time in transitioning between QMS as it might take a while before you stabilize on a new system.

Evaluating Arena and Competitors

I would not change my selection process.

Arena Support

ProsCons
Quick Resolution
Good followup
Knowledgeable team
No escalation required
Immediate help available
Support understands my problem
Quick Initial Response
None
In the initial stages of arena purchase, they helped a lot in configuring the QMS to our personal needs. They even offered additional sessions at free of cost to help us getting acquainted with the software. The sessions were very informatory and helped the team understand how to make most of the software.

Using Arena

ProsCons
Like to use
Relatively simple
Easy to use
Technical support not required
Well integrated
Consistent
Convenient
None
  • uploading new documents
  • creating a new form
  • creating quiz for training purposes.
  • navigation from page to page can be improved.
  • search functionality needs to be upgraded .