Cisco Meraki MX Review
August 27, 2023

Cisco Meraki MX Review

Chris Castek | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review

Overall Satisfaction with Cisco Meraki MX

So we use this product in all kinds of different verticals, whether it be healthcare, manufacturing, small business, you know, all over the different verticals. The reason that we lead with this product is because of its ease of use. It's a very easy product to configure, a very easy product to get out there to the customer. We could do a zero-touch deployment with Smart Hands. Overall very, very friendly use cases for these devices.
  • I would say that my favorite feature of this product is the Auto VPN. If you're doing a multi-site Meraki deployment, it's just a matter of clicking a couple of buttons and you're done as to getting inside a CLI and doing a very more complex VPN construction.
  • I would like to see Meraki implement a more robust logging feature for the firewall side of this. That's one thing that's lacking between an MX and a traditional ASA.
  • ASA gives you a more in-depth and granular view of logging, whereas compared to the MX it only gives you very minor details and glimpses at things.

Do you think Cisco Meraki MX delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Cisco Meraki MX's feature set?

Yes

Did Cisco Meraki MX live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of Cisco Meraki MX go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Cisco Meraki MX again?

Yes

  • So we feel that in general, as far as my company goes, the return on investment for these things is very great. There's always the new cycle of customers needing renewals on their subscriptions. Once we get these into customer sites, we usually see that they're very happy with the product and want to continue with it throughout its lifecycle. So when something reaches end of life, it's very easy for us to go in with the next model that's recommended from Cisco Meraki. And it definitely makes sense.
So ease of deployment. Again this is a very great thing where I can sit back at the head end, develop and create a new organization, create a new network, pre-configure this device, and just have Smart Hands, say in another state plug this in for me. And it's up and it's working. It's very simplified that way. And then, when I do transition this over to our NOC services junior analysts and junior engineers, they're able to correct and diagnose problems very easily just based off of the dashboard view. And they're not getting lost in the CLI.
It allows for a better profit when deploying these out to customer sites. We basically have a template when we're doing a scope of work and setting up a project for a customer where if we're setting out an MX device, here's how much it's gonna cost, here's the time. And typically, if we're done sooner than that, it's a bigger margin, but at the same time, it just makes things so much easier.
It's very easy to scale this out for larger deployments. Because the MX device is just a piece of hardware. If you're going from a small 50 office environment where like the older MX 64 was more capable and you're going up to something with 200 people, you could just remove that MX 64 from the dashboard, implement an MX 84, and there you go. It's just automatically gonna be on and scaled to that product.
So, other products that I've used in the firewall world that are kind of equal to this is traditional Cisco ASA, I've used SonicWall firewalls and Sophos firewalls as well. As far as how they stack up each really has its place a lot of the time when it comes to customer choice. A lot of it depends on the dollar side, and though we try to steer them towards Meraki as a first step. Sometimes if they want to go with that Sonic Wall, because it is less expensive though they are sacrificing a lot when they do go that route. But that's on the customer's pocketbook I suppose.
So most use cases, this product fits. There aren't that many situations where it doesn't, and I've put it inside of banks. I've used it inside of schools, I've used it at normal businesses, big, bigger, and or small, but very small use cases where it has not, and we could not lead with it was at some banks. They did require NetOver VPN when communicating with higher-fed entities. If in the future Meraki could include NetOver VPN, then this would just be an auto-include for most of our deployments.

Cisco Meraki MX Feature Ratings

Not Rated
Identification Technologies
Not Rated
Visualization Tools
Not Rated
Content Inspection
Not Rated
Policy-based Controls
Not Rated
Active Directory and LDAP
Not Rated
Firewall Management Console
Not Rated
Reporting and Logging
Not Rated
VPN
Not Rated
High Availability
Not Rated
Stateful Inspection
Not Rated
Proxy Server
Not Rated