Perfect tool for small teams

Overall Satisfaction with Jama Connect

We use JAMA for projects requirements to allocate the requirements to different departments
  • Having List view and reading views
  • Import from Excel and word document
  • Powerful API to integrate JAMA with other tools
  • Relatively stable system
  • lots of good functionalities
  • Export/Reports are not easy for the end users. the templates are too complicated
  • In my opinion, JAMA does not cope well with large volume of data, e.g. only first 100 in user group are displayed
  • defects reporting is complicated
  • Report of new features can be done , but with different login info and not the same as reporting defects .

Do you think Jama Connect delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Jama Connect's feature set?

Yes

Did Jama Connect live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of Jama Connect go as expected?

No

Would you buy Jama Connect again?

Yes

  • return on small projects
  • less return on large projects or products
for small project , JAMA is a huge help. instead of using Excel, JAMA is a single source of information.

we use a different workflow for review status as we have multi-discipline and large teams
-API in JAMA is stronger
-JAMA is good for small projects ( e.g with 20k requirements)
- JAMA is not strong when it gets to reports and exports
JAMA is good when a organisation is doing either product development or project delivery.
JAMA functions are not so great for very large system ( e.g. for more than 10-20k requirements)