Overall Satisfaction with Lever
Currently, we use Lever as our ATS to create a database of past, current, and future candidates we can assist with their job search. We utilize the email feature to keep all communication inside of Lever. It helps to solve the problem of being able to easily access candidates at any given time. We use Lever on a daily basis and also communicate internally using the @ mention feature. There are areas where additional features could allow us to remove the usage of supplemental software.
- Allows you to track your talent pipeline according to the stage.
- Communicate internally with team members
- Large capacity for storing a lot of candidate data safely
- We currently also use SeaTable as it allows us to see things like the date an interview was scheduled with a client. This additional feature would be amazing.
- It would be great to have subcategories. For example, saying someone is at the onsite interview would be the first stage and the sub-category could be scheduling, to signify the interview is in the process of being scheduled.
- We work with external clients so being able to internally track the offer details from the client would be a great additional feature so that we can have a fully comprehensive view of the candidate's interview funnel.
- Overall positive impact on tracking candidates.
- Negative impact on the smaller details we can't track and thus have to use additional software to track.
- Positive impact on helping with organization.
Do you think Lever delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Lever's feature set?
Yes
Did Lever live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Lever go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Lever again?
Yes