Breakdown of Miro
Overall Satisfaction with Miro
Any sprint planning on a quarterly basis, to explain technical concepts to non-technical stakeholders, high-level engineering diagrams. The use case is that it supports end-to-end visualization of technical diagrams and allows for live contribution on the former. I also use it for workshops where I encourage people to contribute and this helps with overall engagement.
Pros
- Accessibility of different shapes
- Interconnectivity of functionality
- Live engagement
Cons
- Lag time
- Ability to handle 50+ contributors
- Ability to store boards more logically
- improved productivity,
- reduced project completion
- uicker return on initial costs
Enhanced engagement
Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Miro's feature set?
Yes
Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Miro go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy Miro again?
Yes
Way more intuitive
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation