508 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.2 out of 100
40 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 5.1 out of 100

Feature Set Ratings

    Project Management

    7.7

    Atlassian Jira Align

    77%

    Digital.ai Agility

    Feature Set Not Supported
    N/A
    Atlassian Jira Align ranks higher in 14/14 features

    Task Management

    9.0
    90%
    21 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Resource Management

    8.1
    81%
    21 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Gantt Charts

    7.7
    77%
    15 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Scheduling

    7.6
    76%
    17 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Workflow Automation

    6.7
    67%
    16 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Team Collaboration

    9.5
    95%
    21 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Support for Agile Methodology

    9.3
    93%
    20 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Support for Waterfall Methodology

    5.8
    58%
    13 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Document Management

    6.7
    67%
    17 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Email integration

    7.6
    76%
    17 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Mobile Access

    5.6
    56%
    14 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Timesheet Tracking

    8.4
    84%
    15 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Change request and Case Management

    8.4
    84%
    19 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Budget and Expense Management

    8.0
    80%
    11 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Professional Services Automation

    8.0

    Atlassian Jira Align

    80%

    Digital.ai Agility

    Feature Set Not Supported
    N/A
    Atlassian Jira Align ranks higher in 4/4 features

    Quotes/estimates

    8.3
    83%
    12 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Invoicing

    7.1
    71%
    12 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Project & financial reporting

    8.6
    86%
    14 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Integration with accounting software

    7.9
    79%
    8 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Attribute Ratings

    • Atlassian Jira Align is rated higher in 1 area: Likelihood to Recommend
    • Digital.ai Agility is rated higher in 1 area: Support Rating

    Likelihood to Recommend

    8.8

    Atlassian Jira Align

    88%
    21 Ratings
    8.4

    Digital.ai Agility

    84%
    9 Ratings

    Likelihood to Renew

    9.6

    Atlassian Jira Align

    96%
    2 Ratings

    Digital.ai Agility

    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Usability

    6.6

    Atlassian Jira Align

    66%
    2 Ratings

    Digital.ai Agility

    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Support Rating

    7.1

    Atlassian Jira Align

    71%
    21 Ratings
    9.2

    Digital.ai Agility

    92%
    4 Ratings

    Implementation Rating

    10.0

    Atlassian Jira Align

    100%
    1 Rating

    Digital.ai Agility

    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Vendor post-sale

    9.0

    Atlassian Jira Align

    90%
    1 Rating

    Digital.ai Agility

    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Vendor pre-sale

    9.0

    Atlassian Jira Align

    90%
    1 Rating

    Digital.ai Agility

    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Likelihood to Recommend

    Atlassian

    The Atlassian Jira Align (formerly AgileCraft) tools help keep our scrum teams moving in the right direction. It gives Sr. Executives visibility into the progress of our digital transformation efforts. It provides information to our program manager to create the necessary artifacts to justify continued funding of our initiatives. It also supports the SAFe framework, along with some others. And the Atlassian Jira Align (formerly AgileCraft) tools provide integration to other tools that we use in our portfolio.
    Read full review

    Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)

    Scenarios where it works well: 1) Retros can be very well facilitated & notes/action items
    can be captured against the sprint. 2) Product Owner can effectively track the story
    progress with all the test-cases, design etc. 3) Being good scaling support, it provides good visibility
    across multiple teams, programs and agile portfolios, providing a centralized
    environment where all our stakeholders can easily work together regardless of location. 4) It provides easy tracking all of your epics,
    stories, themes, defects, tasks, tests and issues 5) I like its intuitive UI as for moving stories
    around, burning hours. 6) It allows top leadership to visualize
    and report their strategic plans, giving all stakeholders the relevant data
    that they need to stay dedicated to the project priorities. 7) It can be easily integrated with slack
    so for few teams we used slack for collaboration Scenarios where it did not work well: 1) Test Management need improvement in
    terms of tracking tests, team had hard time tracking regression test cases. 2) Version one comes with lot of features like
    Rally but here we don’t get customizations which is there in Jira where from workflow
    to issue everything can be customized based on your team/program/portfolio
    requirements. 3) Lot of navigation to access basic
    stuff. Example I want to go to bug attachment , there are lt of clicks &
    navigation need to do which should be pretty straightforward I feel.
    Read full review

    Pros

    Atlassian

    • Effective Sprint planning : Sprint planning can be done using Planning Poker in AgileCraft by clicking Team > Manage > Other > Estimation Games very effectively for distributed teams.
    • Team Capacity Allocation Report: After tasks are created at team or program level, the report from AgileCraft cab be pulled and can be verified that no team member is under or over allocated. A report can be generated by navigating to Team > Manage > Assign Tasks.
    • Effective Requirement trace-ability: To maintain requirements trace-ability follow the steps below:
    • Upload test cases against the story/requirement. once uploaded test cases will be visible under that story
    • Execute Test cases in AgileCraft and mark them as Pass/Fail based on the actual outcome
    • Based on test results, The acceptance criterion's can be marked as “Pass” or “Fail” & if marked failed corresponding defect can be logged & can be attached with the story
    • So against each story we can easily see whether all test cases been executed or not & which acceptance criterion's are failed & how many defects are in open or close state.
    • Daily Scrum: In AgileCraft, the option to run a daily stand-up is available from Team > Manage > Daily Standups. Selecting the sprint number opens the daily stand-up meeting window in which each team member's tasks are visible and hours can be burned against them. Conduct Scrum meetings in AgileCraft, and burn each associate hour against the tasks created during the meeting. The burn-down chart can be generated & viewed during the stand-up to check whether the team is on track.
    Read full review

    Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)

    • Automated saving of changes, no records can be lost because all items are saved in real-time.
    • The watch function, optional but beneficial when managing multiple teams or projects.
    Read full review

    Cons

    Atlassian

    • The initial ticket creation screen lacks some important features, such as assigning "point values" (a measure of effort needed for the ticket).
    • The browser needs to be manually refreshed to see new tickets, which can make things confusing when several people in a meeting are simultaneously creating tickets.
    • The interface on some smaller portions of the software are sometimes difficult to understand.
    Read full review

    Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)

    • Saving of changes is inconsistent. Sometimes the changes appear to save automatically and other times the user needs to click the "Apply" button. Until the user is familiar with when this needs to happen, work can easily be lost.
    • This may be a setup configuration issue, but it would be good to be able to set the default team when creating stories. Too often stories are created and the user forgets to enter the team and they need to search the entire database for the story that was just created.
    Read full review

    Pricing Details

    Atlassian Jira Align

    Starting Price

    $0 per year

    Editions & Modules

    Atlassian Jira Align editions and modules pricing
    EditionModules
    Starting Price$27,000.001
    Maximum Price$3,987,600.002

    Footnotes

    1. per year
    2. per year

    Offerings

    Free Trial
    Free/Freemium Version
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services

    Entry-level set up fee?

    No setup fee

    Additional Details

    Digital.ai Agility

    Starting Price

    Editions & Modules

    Digital.ai Agility editions and modules pricing
    EditionModules

    Footnotes

      Offerings

      Free Trial
      Free/Freemium Version
      Premium Consulting/Integration Services

      Entry-level set up fee?

      No setup fee

      Additional Details

      Likelihood to Renew

      Atlassian

      There is nothing that can be better than Jira but it needs to keep improving certain areas especially the attachment size area.
      Read full review

      Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)

      No answers on this topic

      Usability

      Atlassian

      Most of the things are easily manageable except certain things that are hidden and you need to ask teammates who are aware of how they can link attachements in the comment section and so on.
      Read full review

      Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)

      No answers on this topic

      Support Rating

      Atlassian

      Overall support from Jira team is good. It comes at an additional price but it is very efficient. There are no long wait times, you get a dedicated team to look into your issues. The support is available throughout the year and they keep a record of your issues. Overall we are very satisfied with the support they have provided us over the years, it has been very effective for the price that we pay.
      Read full review

      Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)

      VersionOne provides outstanding training. They have Product Owner training that I recommend every Product Owner attend. They have scrum master training and other agile training that was well worth the money paid because it made the teams more productive. And the support for the tool is incredible. These people live and breathe Agile and are evangelists and enthusiasts.
      Read full review

      Alternatives Considered

      Atlassian

      Microsoft Azure Devops won't have the major functionality of software management like Jira. The customization provided by Jira is having a cutting edge over any project management tool. Adds-on and Plugins feature in the Jira Tool make it as perfect as desired task management tool for any company. One of the best Agile based Project Management Tools.
      Read full review

      Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)

      Basecamp functions much differently from Version One and serves a different purpose, so it's kind of like comparing apples and oranges. However, both V1 and Basecamp have their pros and cons. V1 makes it easier to manage Agile processes, but Basecamp is more user-friendly and can be used for broader purposes. At our organization, we utilize both products. V1 is what we use to manage processes internally, and Basecamp is what we use to manage client-facing processes. If our organization wasn't Agile, I would prefer to use Basecamp for all project management (internal and client-facing), and have done so at previous organizations for which I've worked
      Read full review

      Return on Investment

      Atlassian

      • It has positively impacted our tech teams, allowing them to better organize the tasks and items they are working on and has greatly improved their ability to communicate & review these tasks with other teams.
      • I believe it negatively impacted other departments as lengthy training was required by many associates to attempt using the tool, only to find out it didn't meet our needs, therefore much time was wasted.
      Read full review

      Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)

      • I came in near the end of our use of VersionOne (we are migrating to Jira), and I don't operate or think at the business return (ROI) level. I'm not the one to comment on this!
      • I suspect that V1 added much clarity to the prioritization of work, and added visibility across entire teams. So I assume that it had a positive impact on returns.
      Read full review

      Add comparison