Cisco Intersight Infrastructure Service vs. TeamCity

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco Intersight Infrastructure Service
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Cisco Intersight Infrastructure Service (IIS) is an infrastructure lifecycle management solution that helps IT operations teams manage their compute, storage, and networking infrastructure—wherever it is—all from one place. Designed for Cisco UCS and HyperFlex customers, Cisco IIS simplifies infrastructure management to help teams deliver outstanding digital experiences. IIS can be used to operate with consistency and control, strengthen an organization's security posture, and increase…N/A
TeamCity
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
TeamCity is a continuous integration server from Czeck company JetBrains.N/A
Pricing
Cisco Intersight Infrastructure ServiceTeamCity
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco Intersight Infrastructure ServiceTeamCity
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco Intersight Infrastructure ServiceTeamCity
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Cisco Intersight Infrastructure ServiceTeamCity
Small Businesses
HashiCorp Terraform
HashiCorp Terraform
Score 8.5 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Ansible
Ansible
Score 8.9 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Ansible
Ansible
Score 8.9 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco Intersight Infrastructure ServiceTeamCity
Likelihood to Recommend
7.5
(23 ratings)
10.0
(18 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.2
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.5
(6 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.3
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
7.5
(22 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
8.4
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Professional Services
8.5
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco Intersight Infrastructure ServiceTeamCity
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
Cisco Intersight is very well suited for doing firmware upgrades across all of your cisco hardware. So far we have had no problems pushing out new firmware. It's also well suited for hardware management. Cisco TAC has the ability to pull logs for the IMC for themselves, which saves you from having to pull the logs yourself and then uploading them to the case. It may or may not be appropriate for upgrading operating systems. I have not been able to test it.
Read full review
JetBrains
TeamCity is very quick and straightforward to get up and running. A new server and a handful of agents could be brought online in easily under an hour. The professional tier is completely free, full-featured, and offers a huge amount of growth potential. TeamCity does exceptionally well in a small-scale business or enterprise setting.
Read full review
Pros
Cisco
  • Ease of implementation of our UCS-X Platforms
  • Ease of Management
  • Cross visibility to our Data Center Infrastructure (Network, Storage, Compute)
  • Ability to Automate our configurations
  • Ability to create profiles for better consistency and standardization
Read full review
JetBrains
  • TeamCity provides a great integration with git, especially Bitbucket.
  • When a new code release (build) fails TeamCity has a great tool for investigation and troubleshooting.
  • TeamCity provides a user-friendly interface. While some technical knowledge is required to use TeamCity, the design helps simply things.
Read full review
Cons
Cisco
  • Interface is quite slow
  • Interface tree (navigating between server, profile, blade, chassis, FI, etc) is counterintuitive and needs more links in the tree
  • Deploying minor changes takes much longer than in UCSM or UCSC
Read full review
JetBrains
  • The customization is still fairly complex and is best managed by a dev support team. There is great flexibility, but with flexibility comes responsibility. It isn't always obvious to a developer how to make simple customizations.
  • Sometimes the process for dealing with errors in the process isn't obvious. Some paths to rerunning steps redo dependencies unnecessarily while other paths that don't are less obvious.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cisco
We use it every single day and love the ease of it and the integration of all our servers
Read full review
JetBrains
No answers on this topic
Usability
Cisco
Usability of Cisco Intersight is highly dependent on the licensing purchased. The default (free) license level provides a lot of value for the minimal amount of effort to implement. The paid license levels provide additional features (detailed inventory, configuration management and deployment, etc.)
Read full review
JetBrains
No answers on this topic
Performance
Cisco
No answers on this topic
JetBrains
TeamCity runs really well, even when sharing a small instance with other applications. The user interface adequately conveys important information without being overly bloated, and it is snappy. There isn't any significant overhead to build agents or unit test runners that we have measured.
Read full review
Support Rating
Cisco
Support for this platform is unmatched. I've used only a couple of other platforms, honestly, but Cisco Intersight's support system really works, and they do a great job. Any issue I've had was solved in a timely manner with a polite representative who cared about helping me and not just plainly reading off of a script that doesn't actually help. I rate it well.
Read full review
JetBrains
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
I personally think that Cisco Intersight Infrastructure Service is at the top of its class when it comes to managing data center hardware. The cloud-connected design feels very modern and easy to use. The mobile app is something I wouldn't expect to get in a server management tool. The way it can update, monitor, and manage our servers is very nice. Overall, we are very happy with it.
Read full review
JetBrains
TeamCity is a great on-premise Continuous Integration tool. Visual Studio Team Services (VSTS) is a hosted SAAS application in Microsoft's Cloud. VSTS is a Source Code Repository, Build and Release System, and Agile Project Management Platform - whereas TeamCity is a Build and Release System only. TeamCity's interface is easier to use than VSTS, and neither have a great deployment pipeline solution. But VSTS's natural integration with Microsoft products, Microsoft's Cloud, Integration with Azure Active Directory, and free, private, Source Code repository - offer additional features and capabilities not available with Team City alone.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • It is positive for a few people being able to manage a lot of hardware
  • It does put the management in the cloud, which some could argue is a security vulnerability.
  • It is difficult to move hardware from Intersign managed to standalone.
Read full review
JetBrains
  • TeamCity has greatly improved team efficiency by streamlining our production and pre-production pipelines. We moved to TeamCity after seeing other teams have more success with it than we had with other tools.
  • TeamCity has helped the reliability of our product by easily allowing us to integrate unit testing, as well as full integration testing. This was not possible with other tools given our corporate firewall.
  • TeamCity's ability to include Docker containers in the pipeline steps has been crucial in improving our efficiency and reliability.
Read full review
ScreenShots