eMaint CMMS vs. Hippo CMMS

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
eMaint CMMS
Score 6.7 out of 10
N/A
eMaint offers computerized maintenance management software with features for inventory management, asset management, maintenance scheduling, etc. eMaint is now owned and supported by Fluke Corp since the September 2016 acquisition.
$69
per month per user
Hippo CMMS
Score 2.3 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Hippo CMMS is a maintenance management software tool for organizations of all sizes. It is a SaaS solution offering a customized interface designed to suit users' operational maintenance needs. The vendor states that Hippo’s UX design principle has always been the same: features only have value if they're easy to find and use, and so they state their layout is clean and intuitive, making the software a breeze to learn. Hippo CMMS has been providing maintenance software to…
$35
per month per user
Pricing
eMaint CMMSHippo CMMS
Editions & Modules
Team
$69
per month per user
Professional
$85
per month per user
Enterprise
$120
per month per user
Hippo Starter
$35
per month per user
Hippo Plus
$55
per month per user
Hippo Pro
$75
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
eMaint CMMSHippo CMMS
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee$600 Single User
Additional DetailsHippo CMMS subscription pricing is determined based on the number of users. A user is anyone that needs to log in and access Hippo' s core features. Users include managers, owners, technicians, and supervisors. Maintenance requesters are not users. Price is also determined by required features. We have pricing plans for complex operations that require deeper functionality and plans for simple operations that are new to CMMS.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
eMaint CMMSHippo CMMS
Considered Both Products
eMaint CMMS

No answer on this topic

Hippo CMMS
Chose Hippo CMMS
Hippo CMMS was more user friendly for my maintenance men then the other software programs we tested. The difference was really how easy Hippo is to use navigate. Also the price point was a little better then the competitors. The calendar view really helped sell us on the …
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
eMaint CMMSHippo CMMS
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
TOPdesk
TOPdesk
Score 8.7 out of 10
TOPdesk
TOPdesk
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
TOPdesk
TOPdesk
Score 8.7 out of 10
TOPdesk
TOPdesk
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
eMaint CMMSHippo CMMS
Likelihood to Recommend
6.2
(6 ratings)
2.2
(8 ratings)
Support Rating
5.5
(2 ratings)
8.6
(4 ratings)
User Testimonials
eMaint CMMSHippo CMMS
Likelihood to Recommend
Fluke Corporation
eMaint is well suited to larger facilities with dedicated scheduler/planners. Learning to navigate the database and create reports requires a dedicated resource. Part-time users often forget the process for entering data and navigating the database. In smaller organizations where multiple users enter assets, planned maintenance (PM) tasks and vendors, keeping standardization in the system formatting was difficult.
Read full review
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
I find that Hippo [CMMS] is really well suited for any scenario. Most CMMS are geared toward manufacturing or industrial use, Hippo [CMMS] works as well for a school or church as it would for a factory. The ease of use for the requestor makes it an ideal platform for any institution.
Read full review
Pros
Fluke Corporation
  • We like that eMaint is highly configurable. You can customize fields to meet your needs
  • You can store and track documents and photos assigned to your assets
  • You can run custom reports.
  • Great customer service
Read full review
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
  • Simple to use Work requester.
  • Great customer service and support.
  • Not filled with non-essential items like a lot of "Larger" company CMMS systems
Read full review
Cons
Fluke Corporation
  • Functionality not delivered as promised - on usage of tab.
  • QR code functionality.
  • Friction between implementation team and marketing team that sold this to us.
Read full review
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
  • Completed work order reporting can be improved. It seems harder than it should be to get the data I need.
  • I would like to streamline the work order closing procedure. I feel like it takes longer than it should to open various screens and add labor, mark tasks complete, change status, etc. It is a minor inconvenience, but just waiting a few seconds opening up a new window is time-consuming with many WO at a time.
  • Labor tracking and reporting could be improved.
Read full review
Support Rating
Fluke Corporation
Customer support was always readily available, even when natural disasters were taking place.
Read full review
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
I've used Hippo for several years now. I'm sure other programs have been developed since I did my comparison testing. But Hippo has always done everything we needed it to do. It's very reliable. My guys don't doubt whether or not it's doing its job. The calendar view, ease of use and floor mapping set this program apart from others.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Fluke Corporation
eMaint was by far most the most comprehensive and customizable solution we looked at. The eMaint team was also extremely responsive and available during the selection process. The product training and conferences were very helpful for new user orientation and best practice learning. The customizable reports also allowed us to provide data to management in an easy to digest format
Read full review
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
Ease of end-user to put in a task that they would like to have completed. Hippo is really easy to use and to complete tasks. If a person putting in a task includes their email or phone number we can get ahold of them to ask and questions and it lets them know progress of their task.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Fluke Corporation
  • We easily track service events over multiple locations so we are able to save on costs
  • Able to run asset lists for inspections
  • Able to keep up with contracts' renewals and service costs
Read full review
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
  • Allows tracking something that we did not have before
  • Decision making is now with hard data
  • Replacement and repair cost have been reduced with tracking of maintenance.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Hippo CMMS Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of