KronoDesk vs. Mojo Helpdesk

I advise my customers to use it for all issue tracking, in business development as well as in business operations. An interface to operational systems is therefor very helpful and enlarges the value of the KronoDesk knowledge base, provided that this information is "open" to all users of all departments.

For a small business it is a very good value.

Incentivized

• As a system architect I have a clear overview of open issues through clear issue description and assignment to developers.
• The overview and tracking are most important to me.

• User friendly- easy to setup and get running.
• Built in reports to improve and measure customer satisfaction.
• Always adding new features to enhance the product for the user.
• Support organization responds quickly to issues and questions.

Incentivized

• The possibility to create a system/subsystem/component/interface tree of the system landscape, to be used to more detailed issue associations and subsequent detailed planning and monitoring of issues.
• A quick issue entry with the most important information would be helpful.
• A "live" report that can contains my current "hot" issues would be helpful.

• The ability to be able to customize the priority level of a ticket. Currently these are set by default and can not be changed.
• Text box section on the rating to have the option to tell why a low rating was given.

Incentivized

Several freeware/shareware tools like Bugzilla are missing integration with other systems. HP, IBM and CA like systems are too cumbersome and complicated for "normal" users, for me too much "hassle" to monitor issues and related information and links to other issues.

Price and customer service.

Incentivized

• The ROI is reached faster and exponentially higher, depending on the number of users and cooperating business units.

• Our company’s improved customer support response times and expert service has helped us make money.

Incentivized