Based in San Francisco, Metadata.io is a Demand Generation and ABM platform designed to execute thousands of B2B campaigns in a matter of hours, automatically optimizing campaigns for pipeline impact at a high velocity.
$24,000
per year
Wishpond Propel IQ
Score 1.2 out of 10
N/A
Wishpond's Propel IQ marketing automation platform is designed to make it easy to generate, manage and nurture leads. Business users can automatically score and segment leads into lists based on activity and personal details. They can also send personalized emails after interest is shown in their products or to reach out after a period of inactivity.
Wishpond has a number of tools including: Landing Pages, Website Popups, Forms, Contests & Promotions, Marketing Automation, Email…
$69
per month
Pricing
Metadata.io
Wishpond Propel IQ
Editions & Modules
MetaMatch
$295
per month per installation
Web Personalization
$24,000
per year
Audience Targeting
$24,000
per year
Metadata Base Platform
$60,000
per year
Basic
$69
per month
Pro
$119
per month
Growth
$199
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Metadata.io
Wishpond Propel IQ
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
$2,500 one-time fee per installation
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Yearly plans are 36% off.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Metadata.io
Wishpond Propel IQ
Features
Metadata.io
Wishpond Propel IQ
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Metadata.io
-
Ratings
Wishpond Propel IQ
1.4
10 Ratings
133% below category average
WYSIWYG email editor
00 Ratings
1.07 Ratings
Dynamic content
00 Ratings
1.09 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content
00 Ratings
1.09 Ratings
Landing pages
00 Ratings
1.18 Ratings
A/B testing
00 Ratings
1.010 Ratings
Mobile optimization
00 Ratings
1.09 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting
00 Ratings
2.78 Ratings
List management
00 Ratings
2.610 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences
00 Ratings
1.09 Ratings
Lead Management
Comparison of Lead Management features of Product A and Product B
Metadata.io
-
Ratings
Wishpond Propel IQ
1.0
10 Ratings
146% below category average
Lead nurturing automation
00 Ratings
1.09 Ratings
Lead scoring and grading
00 Ratings
1.010 Ratings
Data quality management
00 Ratings
1.08 Ratings
Automated sales alerts and tasks
00 Ratings
1.07 Ratings
Social Media Marketing
Comparison of Social Media Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Metadata.io
-
Ratings
Wishpond Propel IQ
1.2
9 Ratings
138% below category average
Social sharing and campaigns
00 Ratings
1.29 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Metadata.io
-
Ratings
Wishpond Propel IQ
2.6
9 Ratings
86% below category average
Standard reports
00 Ratings
2.69 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Metadata is well suited when you have a really large ad budget (>50k per month at least). This is because the power of metadata lies in the ability to quickly set up and run a large number of experiments (combinations of channel, audience, creative, and conversion assets). To evaluate these variations, all of them need a large number of impressions, clicks, and conversions to be statistically relevant. If your budget is smaller, you will either have a very small number of experiments (not fully utilizing the power of metadata), or your experiments will not have enough clicks to make informed decisions. We had expected a better explanation of this from metadata before signing up.
It's a great platform if you're looking for something to run contests that provide leads and drive user engagement, but if they also incorporated social media management and scheduling, Wishpond would be a 10 by far. It's definitely worth looking into specifically for running contests throughout the year, for a wide variety of companies and industries.
If you don't have a large budget and audience it's hard to meaningfully optimize. If I have 4 ad creatives, to 2 audience groups on FB and LinkedIn, that creates 16 experiments, each of which needs an ample enough budget, say $40/day, that's now $640 per day or $19K per month.
Limited ability to edit ads after they've been launched. You usually have to stop the ad, clone it, and launch a new campaign.
Can't add new ads to existing campaigns which limits the ability to optimize. If I start an MD campaign with 4 ads, and in a few weeks we see that one is working well and the other 2 are not performing, I can pause those (or it can autopause by rules), but I can't add 2 more new creatives to the mix against the high performer. I'd have to either stop the high performer, and recreate it in a new campaign (losing likes and comments), OR - leave the high performer in the first campaign, and create. a second campaign with the new ones, which will only optimize against each other.
Limited to a single conversion event on a landing page. I'm not able to choose either a Demo Request OR a Sign-Up conversion, I can only choose one.
Google search ads are doable but aren't necessarily more feature-rich or easy-to use than native, so there's no value added to doing it through Metadata in my opinion aside from unifying ad reporting.
There is no support at Wishpond. I contacted my project manager's manager over a week ago without a reply. When I responded to the automated 'How is your experience' email saying how awful it was there was no follow-up. When I had trouble and had to escalate things it resulted in some new procedures being put in place that changed nothing and they never checked in to see if things were fixed.
We chose [Metadata.io] because it was a smaller company and could get more personalized attention. The price was better and they seemed more eager to support us. The feature set was what we were looking for and not more - it was exactly as robust as we needed it to be. Didn't want to pay for features we weren't going to use.
We choose Wishpond as our first option since we were a startup e-commerce. Klaviyo was a little bit expensive for us and Wishpond really suits pretty well in our budget. Besides, if you don't have so many clients, at a first glance, there are a lot of features that would not be taken advantage of. That is why Wishpond was a better option when we started.
Huge decrease in CPLs, CPMQL and Cost Per Opportunity
Big improvement in MQL to SQL rates
90%+ of our leads from paid social now have valid business emails, before it was like 30%
Saving us hundreds of hours over the course of the next year doing daily manual optimization and budget management tasks for us so we can focus on strategy and testing new things