MS SharePoint / SQL vs. Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
MS SharePoint / SQL
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
MS SharePoint / SQL refers to Microsoft Sharepoint, a web-based collaborative platform, being used in tandem with Microsoft SQL Server to provide business intelligence analytics and reporting. They can provide BI content such as data connections, reports, scorecards, dashboards, and more.N/A
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management (EPM) is a solution that helps users model and plan across finance, HR, supply chain, and sales, streamline the financial close process. Oracle Cloud Enterprise Performance Management (EPM) Platform is a framework of the technical and functional components shared among Cloud EPM processes.
$250
per user/per month
Pricing
MS SharePoint / SQLOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
EPM Standard
$250
per user/per month
EPM Enterprise
$500
per user/per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
MS SharePoint / SQLOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPricing per user varies by component within the Oracle EPM Cloud solution. Please see pricing information for the EPM Cloud components on cloud.oracle.com or contact Oracle Sales at +1.800.633.0738.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
MS SharePoint / SQLOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
MS SharePoint / SQLOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
MS SharePoint / SQL
8.9
55 Ratings
8% above category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
5.6
3 Ratings
35% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports8.936 Ratings8.12 Ratings
Customizable dashboards8.753 Ratings4.43 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates9.145 Ratings4.43 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
MS SharePoint / SQL
9.1
52 Ratings
12% above category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
9.2
23 Ratings
11% above category average
Drill-down analysis8.942 Ratings9.722 Ratings
Formatting capabilities9.652 Ratings9.521 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages8.030 Ratings00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration9.850 Ratings8.419 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
MS SharePoint / SQL
9.1
56 Ratings
9% above category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
9.0
19 Ratings
10% above category average
Publish to Web8.852 Ratings9.016 Ratings
Publish to PDF8.048 Ratings8.919 Ratings
Report Versioning8.845 Ratings9.017 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling9.740 Ratings9.015 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers10.032 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
MS SharePoint / SQL
9.2
34 Ratings
13% above category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
5.9
3 Ratings
25% below category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)8.933 Ratings6.03 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization10.032 Ratings6.83 Ratings
Predictive Analytics10.029 Ratings5.13 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
MS SharePoint / SQL
9.3
67 Ratings
8% above category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
9.2
24 Ratings
6% above category average
Multi-User Support (named login)10.059 Ratings9.020 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model9.062 Ratings9.323 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)9.666 Ratings8.920 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)9.053 Ratings9.321 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
MS SharePoint / SQL
9.2
57 Ratings
14% above category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.2
2 Ratings
10% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access9.754 Ratings6.22 Ratings
Mobile Application9.133 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile8.038 Ratings00 Ratings
Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of Product A and Product B
MS SharePoint / SQL
9.3
37 Ratings
16% above category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
REST API9.028 Ratings00 Ratings
Javascript API9.926 Ratings00 Ratings
iFrames9.027 Ratings00 Ratings
Java API9.025 Ratings00 Ratings
Themeable User Interface (UI)9.032 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable Platform (Open Source)9.923 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
MS SharePoint / SQL
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
8.8
38 Ratings
6% above category average
Long-term financial planning00 Ratings9.230 Ratings
Financial budgeting00 Ratings9.738 Ratings
Forecasting00 Ratings8.937 Ratings
Scenario modeling00 Ratings8.635 Ratings
Management reporting00 Ratings7.833 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
MS SharePoint / SQL
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
9.1
20 Ratings
13% above category average
Financial data consolidation00 Ratings9.817 Ratings
Journal entries and reports00 Ratings9.714 Ratings
Multi-currency management00 Ratings8.913 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations00 Ratings8.914 Ratings
Minority Ownership00 Ratings8.612 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting00 Ratings9.716 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails00 Ratings8.216 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
MS SharePoint / SQL
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
8.4
34 Ratings
2% above category average
Financial Statement Reporting00 Ratings9.629 Ratings
Management Reporting00 Ratings7.932 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting00 Ratings8.430 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting00 Ratings7.828 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing00 Ratings8.519 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
MS SharePoint / SQL
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.7
25 Ratings
4% below category average
Personalized dashboards00 Ratings8.225 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards00 Ratings7.73 Ratings
KPIs00 Ratings7.44 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis00 Ratings6.74 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting00 Ratings8.124 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data00 Ratings8.024 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
MS SharePoint / SQL
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
9.1
36 Ratings
9% above category average
Flat file integration00 Ratings9.634 Ratings
Excel data integration00 Ratings9.632 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources00 Ratings8.228 Ratings
Best Alternatives
MS SharePoint / SQLOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Small Businesses
BrightGauge
BrightGauge
Score 8.9 out of 10
IBM Planning Analytics
IBM Planning Analytics
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Reveal
Reveal
Score 9.9 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Jaspersoft Community Edition
Jaspersoft Community Edition
Score 9.7 out of 10
Anaplan
Anaplan
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
MS SharePoint / SQLOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(74 ratings)
8.9
(46 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.8
(7 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(7 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
8.8
(7 ratings)
6.8
(3 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.0
(2 ratings)
8.2
(16 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
MS SharePoint / SQLOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
A simple and important scenario well suited is that you can configure alerts to notify you when the production server fails. another best feature is the report server is the central component of reporting services. For me something less appropriate is that the admin must ensure optimal performance for farm operations, they recommend that you install SQL Server on a dedicated server that does not run other farm roles and does not host databases for other applications.
Read full review
Oracle
It is well suited in a geographically distributed environment where you have various key participants in multiple time zones providing input and necessary explanations on performance and measured success It is less appropriate where you have a single office environment with a single finance department working together. It is also less suited when the GL is NOT an Oracle product and the interface between the GL and the reporting software needs to be implemented with utmost care and handling.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Flexible - able to make any changes we would like vs traditional service desk system.
  • ROI - We were already using SharePoint for internal intranet, so we are simply getting more use out of licensing we had already committed to.
  • Easy to use for end users.
Read full review
Oracle
  • Account Reconciliation CLoud Services provides tight integration with Oracle R12 and 11i . Provides drillback capability. It is flexible and provides rich functionality to users.
  • We have implemented ARCS on cloud and migrated planning and budgeting from On premise to PBCS and EPBCS. Functionality is onpar with onpremise. Provides regular updates monthly
  • We don't need to upgrades every year and saved a lot on Hardware.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • It is hard to setup and nightmare
  • It requires a of infrastructure, thus it could be costly because of requirement and licensing required for everything to run smoothly
  • If it is not setup and organized properly from the beginning it could be maintenance nightmare
  • It is hard to have "test" environment to do patches or similar
Read full review
Oracle
  • The limitation of constrained out of the box dimensions that requires ripping the initial implementation to add the new dimensions is a major drawback.
  • Smartview interface is cumbersome for many.
  • The only financial adapter is available for integration for other modules we have to go with file-based uploads which is cumbersome and not real-time.
  • It is very costly in terms of licensing unlike other Oracle products.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
This was a long-term buy-in from a corporate perspective, to remain in the SharePoint space. Migration is certainly possible, which is good for planning and having options further out. At this point, the only planned migration is to eventually move the architecture up to SharePoint/SQL 2013. At that point, we will be able to leverage some greater efficiencies, some enhanced content design and management features, and some more current social features. It is well worth a full consideration in any shop looking at a new implementation of or migration to SharePoint (although you will probably be considering 2013 versions or beyond in those discussions), but the platform should be a strong competitor to any alternatives. Realizing the capability of a fully-branded and customized website was not part of the original choice for the architecture at Lincoln, but seeing it implemented and functioning now with this capacity far beyond original expectations has certainly cemented plans to continue using it.
Read full review
Oracle
We have a pretty good userbase who are at the high level who gained value from this tool. Discontinuing this tool is prone to impact their day to day operations. Also the data in this tool cannot alter the source, which maintains the integrity of this tool. Smartview is a cool addition that gained lot of traction as well.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
SharePoint is very complex. This makes usability somewhat difficult from an IT perspective. An IT generalist will be able to pick it up and run with basic tasks. More customized functions would require significant specialized training and therefore limit what a standard user would be able to achieve. From an end user perspective, it's pretty straightforward to use.
Read full review
Oracle
EPM usability is good in some modules but needs some improvement in others
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Oracle
EPM has been so far available all the time
Read full review
Performance
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Oracle
The product performance is so far very good
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
It's been fantastic in terms of Premier Support so far. If there is an issue and if you report if the product has an issue, they will act upon it immediately. In some cases, if you design/develop something using the platform, Microsoft appreciates it and... publishes it on their public website. But you have to wait for some time if it is a non-Premier Support issue as you may experience delays.
Read full review
Oracle
Support from our implementation partner is a 10/10, but support from Oracle is awful. Case in point: recently over a 2-day period, there were a series of intermittent outages. Oracle actually asked US for the outage time-stamps. I would have thought that, since we were paying them, they should probably be able to tell us!
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
Not implemented in best practice way, there are many customizations
Read full review
Oracle
I suggest doubling the time to implement from the initial quote you get from the Sales team. That's always been the case for me for multiple EPMs now. The out-of-the-box functionality of Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is pretty robust so I appreciate that and it really helped us get the ball rolling quickly.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
At the time of the two large projects, SharePoint was the enterprise solution so we were required to use that. We have since lobbied the enterprise teams to review and consider Atlassian Confluence and were successful. Confluence is cheaper than Sharepoint which is why we wanted to bring that in. The enterprise has now made Confluence an enterprise solution as an alternative to SharePoint. After using both I think SharePoint has many more add-ins than Confluence. It has much more customization ability than Confluence. SharePoint is not good for mobile readiness. Confluence is so there is a difference that might lead you to Confluence over SharePoint. I would also say that SharePoint is very document-centric and that Confluence has better KM than SharePoint does. even with the use of SQL Server. We were told that we could not use Google Drive even though it had features we liked.
Read full review
Oracle
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud fared very well against Adaptive, Anaplan, and Host Analytics. We ultimately decided on Oracle due to its reputation and strength of existing customers. We are happy with our decision.
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Oracle
The product is scalable
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • I've installed SharePoint in many different industries and each industry has seen greater collaboration among their teams both locally and nationally. The ability to collaborate more efficiently has reduced the need to have employees centrally located.
  • Companies which have used SharePoint in a end user training portal have had great ROI, since they can create the content once and share with all their users who subscribe to their training service. The web content management aspect of SharePoint is a very helpful feature.
Read full review
Oracle
  • Significantly reduced the amount of money we spent for the maintenance of in-house hardware.
  • We now need less employees to manage the configurations of Oracle EPM Cloud.
  • There have been many time savings as a whole to apply to more productive causes.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management Screenshots

Screenshot of Process and Workflow - Flexible Workflow and Process Management - Annotations - Concurrency in UsageScreenshot of Integration - External Integration - Oracle ERP Systems and Hybrid On-Premise DeploymentScreenshot of Planning and Forecasting - Decision-Oriented Plans with Instant Feedback Loop - What-If Modeling and SandboxScreenshot of Process and Workflow - Flexible Workflow and Process Management - Annotations - Concurrency in UsageScreenshot of User Interface - Role-Based, Intuitive User Interface - Role-Based Navigation Flows - Microsoft Office InterfaceScreenshot of Integration - External Integration - Oracle ERP Systems and Hybrid On-Premise Deployment