Score 7.1 out of 10


Recent Reviews


9 out of 10
March 29, 2017
We are using it for the bug tracking in our project. It is used in our engineering department, for software bug report and tracking.
Continue reading
Read all reviews

Video Reviews

Leaving a video review helps other professionals like you evaluate products. Be the first one in your network to record a review of Bugzilla, and make your voice heard!

Return to navigation


View all pricing

Sorry, this product's description is unavailable

Entry-level set up fee?

  • No setup fee


  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting / Integration Services

Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?

1 person want pricing too

Alternatives Pricing

What is GitLab?

GitLab is a complete open-source DevOps platform, delivered as a single application, fundamentally changing the way Development, Security, and Ops teams collaborate and build software. From idea to production, GitLab helps teams improve cycle time from weeks to minutes, reduce development process…

Sorry, this product's description is unavailable

Return to navigation

Product Demos

Return to navigation

Product Details

What is Bugzilla?

Bugzilla Video

What is Bugzilla?

Bugzilla Integrations

Bugzilla Technical Details

Operating SystemsUnspecified
Mobile ApplicationNo

Frequently Asked Questions

BugTracker.net, Gemini, and Jira Software are common alternatives for Bugzilla.

Reviewers rate Availability and Usability highest, with a score of 9.

The most common users of Bugzilla are from Enterprises (1,001+ employees).
Return to navigation


View all alternatives
Return to navigation


(1-3 of 3)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Bugzilla is being used in my department, other departments use JIRA for bug tracking. The problem we have is test management integration with our own testcase repository (previously used HP Quality Center which worked well with Bugzilla, but currently using Testopia which was developed by our company engineers which does not integrate test cases with Bugs reported).
  • Bugzilla is easy to use and access
  • Bug search criteria is very efficent
  • Renaming and saving each bug search thread is useful
  • The UI of how bugs are listed, especially allowing the option to change columns, edit search is very useful
  • Big attachments cannot be uploaded.
  • When two people update the bug at same time it throws both the changes - instead if it can save one and ask the other to save again would help.
  • When we scroll to view the bug, it would be nice if the heading of the bug is showing/static while we scroll down to view the contents of bug comments.
  • Bugzilla home link needs improvement in Test Plan,test run creation - currently we can upload the test plan and link to each test run iteration - if it allows multiple selection of test runs to one test plan it helps.
  • Drag and drop of test cases to test run is very inconvenient as we have to manually drag each test case to test run. If multiple test cases can be checked and moved to Test run it would be helpful.
Buzilla is easy to use and provides basic functionality to use as a bug tracking tool. If big size attachments are allowed it would have been great. Also with Bugzilla home->Test management area is improved by allowing multiple sections it would be awesome!
  • Bugzilla has good impact. It helps for our ISO certification process.
  • Affordable and efficient to be used with small department's funding.
  • Maintenance is minimum when using Bugzilla.
Bugzilla is affordable and easier to use by newly forming team or group in our organization. As the team grows bigger we still continued to use Bugzilla as it is comfortable to use. We tried JIRA tool for bugtracking but it was expensive when compared to Bugzilla so switched back.
  • Bug tracking
  • Bug search and save search criteria
  • Test case management integration
  • Big attachments are not allowed.
  • Viewing a bug does not keep the bug heading static.
  • Test case management integration with Bugzilla doesn't allow multiple test case selection to add them to test run.
Yes, but I don't use it
It is easy to use and efficient to search/lookup old bugs.
Shailesh Patel | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Bugzilla was used by the QA department when we tested the Remedy application and logged the defects/issues found during the testing.
  • Bugzilla was used to log the issue from customers, internal code error and other environmental issues.
  • It helps to track the issue, progress the issue and monitor the issue for long run.
  • It is very strength full tool I think.
  • It is very friendly user and nice to have it.
  • I think you should compare the defect module structure with Quality Center Defect module and structure and modify according to it.
It is very suitable for beginners and a firm smaller than 1000 employees.
  • Positive - It is very user friendly and easy to manage.
  • No negative but its not an advanced level tool as compared to Quality Center Defect module.
Bugzilla is easy to learn, easy to use and track and has an affordable price.
It is easy to use and affordable.
remedy use
I think
  • To log the issue
  • Track the issue
  • Monitor the progress
  • Make it as comparable with QC Defect module
  • More user friendly user
  • Same as today
  • Price
  • Product Usability
This is appropriate for a smaller company.
no idea
  • Implemented in-house
Change management was a major issue with the implementation
  • Issues are difficult to view as a whole
  • SLA issue
  • In-person training
I know it.
Yes it is.
No idea.
No - there is no facility to customize the interface
No - we have not done any custom code
I prefere this.
  • All are ok.
  • none
I have used and found this rating.
I used it.
I used it.
I like this rating.
  • Remedy application
It is used for remedy app.
  • no
only one system
  • Single Signon
  • ETL tools
I used only those.
I did not integrate it but know it.
I used it.
No idea but this is appropriate.
Price and warranty.
  • Easy to use
  • Affordable
  • More advances
  • Lower price
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
  • It has a clean interface that customer service can input support tickets in regards to tech issues on the site.
  • Ability to go back and forth with the developer = less meetings & more productivity.
  • Nothing.
  • Faster response time to tech issues.
  • Ability to see all of the outstanding tickets.
  • Ability to factor in overall # of tickets placed in relation to work productivity.
This is a very basic system for entering and tracking bugs. It doesn't really have any bells and whistles such as rating bugs in a hierarchy of importance or color coding, etc. There are other systems out there that allow you to do additional things like track time estimates a and provide detailed reporting metrics which are not available in Bugzilla.
  • Created a centralized system for all web related tech issues
  • Ability to organize and manage projects and put them in a level of importance
  • All management have the ability to view the status on an issue and any ongoing projects.
  • Better time management for development; as company sees all of the fine details.
  • Great for documentation.
  • Implemented in-house
Implementation was pretty simple. Particularly because the product cannot be customized so there is not much to do apart from getting it up and running.
  • Self-taught
Very easy to learn. It's a simple product.
They do not offer premium support.
There is no technical support per se - which is OK for a pretty simple product like this. They do offer things like user forums and Q&As which are effective enough.
This is a pretty straightforward system. You put in the bug details, a ticket is created, the team is notified. The user interface reflects this very simple and straightforward flow. It's certainly much easier than trying to track bugs with using Excel and email.
I never experienced any downtime.
No real issues here.
No vendor relationship. The product was downloaded and and implemented internally.
Return to navigation