Airbase for Large Multi-entity users
February 29, 2024
Airbase for Large Multi-entity users
Score 6 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Software Version
Standard
Overall Satisfaction with Airbase
We have about 30 entities across multiple states that we currently manage using Airbase. It houses all of our corporate spend, including Accounts Payable, Corporate Cards, and Employee Reimbursements. We have built approval workflows to manage the spend occurring by numerous individuals that travel. The most important feature for us is the GL integration between NetSuite.
- GL Integration
- Vendor Management, including 1099s
- Virtual Cards
- The prefund requirement for corporate cards is burdensome for a multi-entity company.
- Many of the pages require you to view one entity at a time, which is inefficient when managing many different entities on a daily basis.
- There is no ability to assign an expense to a different entity, other than the entity the card is assigned to. When you have employees that travel to multiple sites, their expenses must manually be allocated on the back end.
- The software saved us hundreds of thousands of dollars by flagging duplicate spend.
- By using the accounts payable management tool, we saved 10 hours per week on making manual payments.
- The GL integration feature saved us 10 hours per week that used to be spent recording bills/payments in NetSuite.
The accounts payable automation did save our company a significant amount of time. The software would remember who the appropriate approver was based on the vendor name, making the intake process much faster. The software appears to remember what entity was last charged for that specific vendor, which was helpful at times. However, our company receives invoices from the same vendor for many different entities, and the software was unable to differentiate between the different entities.
We originally were evaluating Stampli when looking for a corporate spend solution. We decided to go with Airbase for two reasons: 1) Pricing structure and 2) Employee Reimbursements. Airbase pricing was based on actual number of payments initiated, whereas Stampli was based on number of invoices read by their OCR software. For us, that meant that invoices received twice by vendors, or invoices that were not going to be paid via Stampli would all count towards our 'invoices processed' number, which we did not want to happen. Also, Stampli did not have the ability to process employee reimbursements, and Airbase included that functionality.
Do you think Airbase delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Airbase's feature set?
No
Did Airbase live up to sales and marketing promises?
No
Did implementation of Airbase go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Airbase again?
No