Item: Everest (Return Path + 250ok)
Rating: 9
Author: Akande Davis

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use Everest (Return Path + 250ok) within our organization to focus on upping deliverability, cleaning up our lists and sender reputation, and becoming more familiar with how our emails are performing within individual email inboxes and email providers. We also use the platform to test out our email design and what is working/not working and what could be flagged as a spam issue.

Pros and Cons

List validation
Design testing
Inbox placement

Onboarding process with reps
Upstart timeline for new customer
Clearer instruction for each module

Return on Investment

Better deliverability
Cleaner lists
Fewer spam traps

Alternatives Considered

Litmus

Litmus does a great job of checking for specific things related to design or spam filtering, but the overall comprehensive approach that Everest (Return Path + 250ok) has by implementing seed listing, list validation, and pixel engagement offers a much stronger solution for deliverability.

Key Insights

Do you think Everest (Return Path + 250ok) delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Everest (Return Path + 250ok)'s feature set?

Yes

Did Everest (Return Path + 250ok) live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of Everest (Return Path + 250ok) go as expected?

Would you buy Everest (Return Path + 250ok) again?

Yes

Likelihood to Recommend

Everest (Return Path + 250ok) is well suited for companies leveraging a marketing automation platform and is in the mid-market to enterprise segment. Everest (Return Path + 250ok) is not suitable, or really ideal, for smaller companies with database sizes less than 50k-100k that are not in the mid-market to the enterprise segment.

Everest (Return Path + 250ok) is the best for the mid-market to enterprise segment

Modules Used

Overall Satisfaction with Everest (Return Path + 250ok)