An honest critique from a student
Overall Satisfaction with Miro
Miro is used because Conceptboard became very laggy and Miro was not laggy at all and was better. Our professor recommended the switch and ever since then eveyone in my class loved Miro and soon most of the school switched to Miro. We used Miro because of covid and being an architect we have to show a lot of drawings that can be edited in real time for reviews. With Miro we could easily make changes and see teachers giving feedback quickly in real time which was very helpful.
Pros
- Real time editing and drawing
- Reduces lag significantly
- Creates more engaging real conversation
Cons
- The interface does lag sometimes
- The file size should be bigger
- Sometimes it takes ages to open
- People submit stuff late as they don't need to print.
- People create less quality stuff as they don't need to print.
- People are more annoyed when the site lags.
It has made it way easier and this is very good. Before we used to print out but during covid Miro really did save us a lot and that was very good. Overall it helped many universities and also many companies and we are very grateful to Miro for everything.
Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Miro's feature set?
Yes
Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Miro go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Miro again?
Yes
I like Miro more due to the ease of it and also the lag is nowhere as bad. Conceptboard is more used in my university, but towards the end of covid we solely started to move away from Conceptboard and more into Miro and it was a change that most studios did.
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation