Symantec Endpoint Security--the good the bad and the ugly
December 18, 2020
Symantec Endpoint Security--the good the bad and the ugly

Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Symantec Endpoint Security
We use Symantec Endpoint Security organization-wide with a central administrating server. That way you have an easy overview of all the resources in the network and their security level, as well as the ability to handle all the administration centrally. You can see if a computer needs updating, if there was an attack, what the attack was, and how it was handled.
- Protects from viruses
- A firewall to monitor network activity
- Blocks USB devices
- Too many changes in the software
- Make it cheaper
- Heavy on resources
- It is probably the most expensive solution I have used to date
- Updating policies doesn't interrupt the user
- Updating definitions is done on LAN so it doesn't impact overall network bandwidth
I have used competing software from different vendors such as McAfee, Eset, and Trend Micro. I found that Symantec Endpoint Security distributes its updates flawlessly and sends a very clear and comprehensive daily report. I also find the customer service very helpful once it gets rolling, though it is a bit of a pain to open a case in the first place.
Do you think Symantec Endpoint Security delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Symantec Endpoint Security's feature set?
Yes
Did Symantec Endpoint Security live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Symantec Endpoint Security go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Symantec Endpoint Security again?
Yes