Cisco Meraki MX vs. Ubiquiti Networks UniFi

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco Meraki MX
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Cisco Meraki MX Firewalls is a combined UTM and Software-Defined WAN solution. Meraki is managed via the cloud, and provides core firewall services, including site-to-site VPN, plus network monitoring.
$595
per appliance
Ubiquiti Networks UniFi
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Ubiquiti Networks in San Jose provides their UniFi wi-fi hotspot technology.N/A
Pricing
Cisco Meraki MXUbiquiti Networks UniFi
Editions & Modules
MX64
$595
per appliance
MX67
$695
per appliance
MX68
$995
per appliance
MX84
$1,995
per appliance
MX100
$4,995
per appliance
MX250
$9,995
per appliance
MX450
$19,995
per appliance
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco Meraki MXUbiquiti Networks UniFi
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco Meraki MXUbiquiti Networks UniFi
Considered Both Products
Cisco Meraki MX
Chose Cisco Meraki MX
Unifi is more suitable for branch office rather than complex network.
Chose Cisco Meraki MX
Lack of security around the cloud architectures. Cisco security with TALOS is world leading knowing the platforms are secured and protected.
Chose Cisco Meraki MX
Meraki is more entailed towards larger businesses and allow much quicker support remediation. Meraki does have a yearly license, whereas UniFi does not. UniFi is really nice and I would use it in smaller single SOHO applications, but wouldn't use it for larger organizations …
Chose Cisco Meraki MX
While Ubiquiti is cheaper and has products that will work at faster speeds, the fact that devices can fall off a network with no questions is an issue. I've never had this issue with [Cisco] Meraki [MX].
Chose Cisco Meraki MX
We felt the Cisco Meraki MX was superior to Ubiquiti when we were doing our initial evaluations. We felt that Meraki was far beyond enterprise-grade than UniFi and we felt that we were getting a lot more features and scalability opportunities for the value. We also noticed that …
Chose Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki does everything the competitors do but in a simpler method allowing more time to focus on the requirements of the company. FortiGate is more granular and offers more choice but for our needs, we decided to move forward with Meraki which can encompass Meraki Wifi …
Chose Cisco Meraki MX
I have deployed the Ubiquiti Networks Dream Machine Pro, and I have to say that the only reason I would ever choose that platform over Meraki is the price of the Meraki licensing. Ubiquiti does not have ongoing license fees, and their devices are seriously less expensive than …
Chose Cisco Meraki MX
We have deployed several firewalls over the years and found Cisco Meraki MX to be a great contender. Datto has high recurring monthly fees for devices with limited configuration options. Ubiquiti works great for our entry-level clients that need a starting point but have a …
Chose Cisco Meraki MX
I would prefer both Untangle and Fortinet over Meraki. The only downside of those two products is you need more technical network knowledge to manage the product. Untangle and Fortinet both offer more features and cost less than Meraki MX devices. Untangle has better …
Chose Cisco Meraki MX
I have evaluated and supported firewalls from MicroTik, Ubiquiti Networks, and SonicWall. The Cisco Meraki MX Security Appliance is a more well rounded and complete product compared to firewalls from these other vendors. The easy of configuration and the feature set of the …
Chose Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco's ASA, Fortinet's Fortigate, Sonicwall, Watchguard

I prefer Cisco ASA for large enterprise deployments. Fortigate works well but I'm not a huge fan of their GUI interface (maybe personal preference). Sonicwall and Watchguard are avoided and only used when we inherit the …
Chose Cisco Meraki MX
We have tried several network solutions. However, we have kept coming back to Cisco Meraki because it's simple and easy to use and bulletproof. It makes network management a joy and not a chore.
Ubiquiti Networks UniFi
Chose Ubiquiti Networks UniFi
I prefer Cisco Meraki MX when compared to the similar solution from Unify. Cisco Meraki is much more stable and the cloud interface is quite better. Cisco Meraki belongs to a more expensive price range, though. I believe that Ubiquiti Networks UniFi is a good solution for the …
Chose Ubiquiti Networks UniFi
Cisco Meraki; Aruba; Juniper: I've looked at all of these. I have a ton of experience deploying and using Cisco Meraki. I love their solution. You get such a high level of technology with all the protections afforded by Cisco on the backend. However, the primary reason I choose …
Chose Ubiquiti Networks UniFi
Ubiquiti is the worst of all network products I've ever used - with the worst support. Even Netgear - as much of a joke as they are - have better products and support.
Chose Ubiquiti Networks UniFi
  • Price for quality.
Chose Ubiquiti Networks UniFi
One way of looking at network equipment is by grouping all into two categories: Standalone, and Centrally Managed.
Most home or SOHO network equipment is standalone, meaning each device is configured individually. If you need to adjust settings off-site, you need to allow it …
Chose Ubiquiti Networks UniFi
Unifi trails the competitors in the switch/gateway category but exceeds all competitors in WiFi and IP cameras.
Cisco Meraki equipment is too expensive along with monthly costs. Netgear equipment is fine for simple networks but a small increase in upfront spend will get you …
Top Pros
Top Cons
TrustRadius Insights
Cisco Meraki MXUbiquiti Networks UniFi
Highlights

TrustRadius
Research Team Insight
Published

The Meraki MX is a cloud-managed security device from Cisco, that combines firewall functionality with SD-WAN to connect distributed branch locations while filtering out unwanted traffic and web content. Ubiquiti Networks offers UniFi as a high performance wireless access point in a streamlined form factor. The Meraki MX appears in enterprise environments, though it is used across companies of all sizes with plenty of options for small and midsize branches. Ubiquiti Networks’ UniFi appears generally in small and midsize companies, likely due to its low cost.

Users of either of these products sometimes contemplate if they can be used together. Short answer: they can. Combining these products may result in savings and (ultimately) convenience, at some loss of the functionality and interoperability inherent in using only Meraki devices for all networking tasks.

Features

Meraki MX and UniFi APs boast convenient form factors, and generally users of both claim to enjoy easy, centralized management of the devices, with clear network inventory, traffic visibility and well-designed dashboards.

Cisco Meraki MX provides users with an easy to setup VPN described by users as being almost automatic. While tersely praising Meraki MX’s security features, most users praise just how easy the appliance is to setup and configure, and generally praise its suitability for small to midsize business networks as a security / SD-WAN all-around.

Unifi offers an AP option with a $0 license controller, contrary to the Meraki AP option, which does present a cost. In addition to the free controller and modestly priced hardware, UniFi AP is said to capably support WiFi needs for offices of any size, with idiot-proof setup and centralized multi-site management with no need to log into individual devices, and a free mobile app.

Limitations

Networks consisting of Meraki MX and Unifi AP devices may also present certain challenges for some users.

Meraki MX devices are said to be expensive, and users report distaste for the subscription model, pointing out that once the subscription is ended the devices are of no use. Users also complain they are inferior to Cisco’s ASA firewall in supporting more complex network setups and operations, stating that the product line truly shines when used across smaller or midsize branches rather than highly complex enterprise environments.

But this may be one reason some investigate them for use with the UniFi AP, which is also said to be optimal for WiFi across small businesses and branch locations. UniFI AP security features are said by some to be lacking, and users also state the trade-off for this relatively low cost device with free administrative software is less than optimal support, and a lighter feature set than options. Additionally, users note that by not pairing Meraki APs with Meraki MX, opting instead for the low cost UniFi, could present issues; though ultimately, it works.

Pricing

Cisco Meraki MX is available through resellers. Pricing fluctuates, but ranges from the Meraki MX64 available for about $400, to the MX450 for enterprises, costing around $15,000. Meraki MX security licenses are available for around $200 per year, with multi-year options available.

UniFi access points can be bought from resellers or direct from Ubiquiti Networks, with prices starting at about $100, mid-range options priced at $180 and $350, to the $1,500 BaseStation XG for large venues. There is no need to purchase a license.

Features
Cisco Meraki MXUbiquiti Networks UniFi
Firewall
Comparison of Firewall features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Meraki MX
7.8
109 Ratings
9% below category average
Ubiquiti Networks UniFi
-
Ratings
Identification Technologies8.0104 Ratings00 Ratings
Visualization Tools8.4102 Ratings00 Ratings
Content Inspection8.0101 Ratings00 Ratings
Policy-based Controls7.9100 Ratings00 Ratings
Active Directory and LDAP7.490 Ratings00 Ratings
Firewall Management Console7.4103 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting and Logging7.4107 Ratings00 Ratings
VPN8.8102 Ratings00 Ratings
High Availability8.7103 Ratings00 Ratings
Stateful Inspection7.697 Ratings00 Ratings
Proxy Server6.557 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cisco Meraki MXUbiquiti Networks UniFi
Small Businesses
pfSense
pfSense
Score 9.4 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
pfSense
pfSense
Score 9.4 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls - PA Series
Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls - PA Series
Score 9.3 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco Meraki MXUbiquiti Networks UniFi
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(148 ratings)
9.0
(39 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.7
(13 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.6
(9 ratings)
9.0
(4 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.3
(18 ratings)
6.9
(6 ratings)
In-Person Training
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
7.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.0
(115 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.5
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.3
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco Meraki MXUbiquiti Networks UniFi
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
Well suited for trying to bring remote sites quickly into your network. It's also suited as a device for remote access to basically quickly set up a secure remote access service to get users to actually access your network from remotely.
Read full review
Ubiquiti Networks
In the past few months we purchased thousands of dollars in brand new networking equipment from Ubiquiti. IT DOES NOT WORK CORRECTLY We bought 2 sets of hardware. 1 for home office and 1 for work. They both have the same issue (internet stops working). We have emailed literally dozens of times with customer service and they have not been able to resolve the issue. We have requested escalation to more trained technicians and have asked them to log into our system to assess. None of this has happened and our internet continues to intermittently work.
Read full review
Pros
Cisco
  • It provides a really good single pane of glass so you can really easily identify end to end, what is going on in your environment.
  • It provides the ability for someone that doesn't necessarily need a really deep level of knowledge to be able to operate and maintain it. I think that's probably a big selling point, but I think definitely for the people that I'm selling the products who just having a dashboard and being able to log onto it and see if things are good or bad is quite key. So it does that really well.
Read full review
Ubiquiti Networks
  • AP's are very affordable.
  • Most of the AP's are highly reliable and can be used indoors or in covered outdoor spaces.
  • Outdoor Mesh AP's with an external directional antenna can effectively cover outdoor spaces with dual band wifi better than much more expensive APs.
  • Unifi Protect via the Cloud Key Gen2+ is probably the slickest, most affordable IP camera system on the market right now.
  • Unifi controller is powerful yet simple to administrate.
  • Remote management of entire networks through a single pane of glass is easy to accomplish with the Unifi controller.
  • Cloud Key Gen2 solves problems with the first Cloud Key wiht a built-in battery backup.
  • When you are "full stack" Unifi with wifi, network switches and gateways, the control you can wield over a network in just a few clicks and the amount of data you can glean from a quick glance in the controller is incredibly impressive. It makes an IT guy wish every product/service could be so tightly and well-integrated.
  • Community support is excellent, Unifi staff monitors their official forums and responds to almost every thread.
Read full review
Cons
Cisco
  • Inbuilt wireless does not support tunnel SSID mode. This has meant not all SSID in our organisation can be deployed at a MX site.
  • Whilst Inbuilt switch ports support dot1x, they do not report as well on our NAC server as on a MS switch or catalyst switch.
Read full review
Ubiquiti Networks
  • VLANs: They can make these work more smoothly. Setup can be more intuitive.
  • Cloud Key: These need to be stabilized; they lose their programming a little too easily.
  • Stop selling the Gen-1 cloud key: No battery means you need an external power source or you must be onsite to power it off before updating.
  • Portal can be modernized.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cisco
The simplicity and ease of use for the Meraki Dashboard make it an easy choice for our organization to renew our Meraki Enterprise Agreement. We will likely continue using the Meraki MC67-C, MX450, and other MX models in their catalog until we shift away from Meraki completely
Read full review
Ubiquiti Networks
No answers on this topic
Usability
Cisco
Some features simply aren't there, but the ones that are there are pretty easy to use. Sometimes it is easy to get lost when trying to find the specific device you want to work on, but that's mostly due to how rarely we have to go into the interface.
Read full review
Ubiquiti Networks
UniFi's system is intuitive in how options are placed and explained throughout the interface. What is not directly explainable within the interface, Ubiquiti does provide several knowledgebase documents explaining best practices and methods of troubleshooting when things don't go exactly right. We've been using them for over three years, and the benefits vastly outweigh any negatives we could come up with on the equipment and system.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Cisco
Meraki MX devices support high availability (HA) configurations, which ensures minimal downtime if one device goes offline. This feature has helped us maintain a stable and reliable network, even in cases of hardware failures. ince Meraki is cloud-managed, we've noticed that the cloud infrastructure is generally highly reliable, with minimal service interruptions or downtime. This makes it easier to manage the network remotely without significant availability concerns. Meraki automatically pushes firmware updates and patches, which helps maintain system stability without requiring manual intervention. These updates are rolled out in a manner that ensures minimal disruption to service.
Read full review
Ubiquiti Networks
No answers on this topic
Performance
Cisco
The interface is pretty responsive. The lower end devices are easy to overwhelm if you have a lot of throughput. Be sure the model you get is rated for the amount of traffic you will have. Overbuild if possible, otherwise you won't be fully leveraging the connection from your ISP.
Read full review
Ubiquiti Networks
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Cisco
I haven't ever had a bad experience with Meraki support. On the few occasions where I wasn't understanding the UI or needed some clarification about what a setting actually would do, I contacted them and they were very quickly able to provide help. Returns are simple and fast, too. We had to return a defective device one time and they shipped the replacement before we had even un-racked the one that was faulty. Unlike many other vendors, they didn't ask use to a do long list of scripted diagnostics, they just took my word for it that the device was broken and sent out a replacement immediately
Read full review
Ubiquiti Networks
Support tickets can be proactively created within the dashboard with full detailed documentation. The Ubiquiti website provides detailed documentation on support. Forum and user groups also provide the interested community with information that covers all aspects of issues or questions users can encounter with the latest and most updated information.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Cisco
great when they offered it, really tested your knowledge with hands on and see what your peers from other orgs know. glad to see that we were ahead of the curve of what our peers knew
Read full review
Ubiquiti Networks
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Cisco
it was okay as it was moderated but still better than nothing and done via semi self paced webex meeting
Read full review
Ubiquiti Networks
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Cisco
Implementing Meraki MX devices in phases—starting with a pilot group or select branch offices—was invaluable. This allowed us to identify potential configuration issues, troubleshoot problems, and refine our setup before rolling it out company-wide. It also helped to get feedback from early users and adjust the deployment strategy accordingly. The SD-WAN capabilities in Meraki MX were essential for optimizing our WAN traffic and ensuring better application performance across various locations.
Read full review
Ubiquiti Networks
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
The main difference is the administration through the Meraki cloud, the ease of access to review the configuration at any time, and the scalability that Meraki provides in terms of the ease of adding new devices, today in addition to how well the devices work is It is important that administration and troubleshooting be simple as it saves time in the event of failures.
Read full review
Ubiquiti Networks
Ubiquiti is overall easier to work with. There is no special training needed to accomplish many of the things required with a Cisco product. Since my time is stretched thin, I need something that I can manage without being weighed down by command-line communications. Also, I am able to use my wireless devices to maintain every Ubiquiti device on my network.
Read full review
Scalability
Cisco
Due to the amount of traffic that some can handle, if the sites become too large, it is necessary to change the model, which is still a good option from the same family but still may be inconvenient for the budget of some.
Read full review
Ubiquiti Networks
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • I'm going to say positive impact. The biggest thing is especially coming from having a third party taking care of our network to us doing it ourselves. The ease of this with the overall high level visual that we can get as to how our day is starting and running reports to see how many outages have we had, what areas have they actually been in running these reports and being able to gather if it's a certain service provider that's causing an issue in a general area, maybe we need to switch service providers for ISP. So it's been great in that mannerism for us. Ease of manage, I mean, we have a limited number of staff, we have a lot of different offices across the country. And then this is relatively new for us because we did have a previous provider doing all of this for us.
Read full review
Ubiquiti Networks
  • The access points and switch were extremely affordable and we've had minimal downtime over the life of the products.
  • The switch was in our main rack and there was a bug in the firmware that would reboot the switch if you made a change to one of the switch ports (that was not in use at the time). This caused our entire organization to have a network outage, in the middle of the day. Fortunately we didn't have any customer refunds to issue. We've had to purchase different switches for the main racks, and place the UniFi switch in a better suited place.
Read full review
ScreenShots