Experlogix CPQ (with e-Con CPQ) vs. PandaDoc

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Experlogix CPQ
Score 3.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Experlogix CPQ (including capabilities of the former e-Con CPQ) helps businesses sell custom products and services. No matter how many options or variations, its guided selling tools, API integrations, calculator and rules engine produce proposals that meet customer needs; it is presented as a quote-to-order tool that synchronizes front and back-office data in real-time. Explerogix CPQ aims to help agents sell more faster.N/A
PandaDoc
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
PandaDoc headquartered in San Francisco offers their eponymous electronic signature platform for sales teams, containing sales proposal automation and CPQ (configure, price, quote) features, and integration with CRMs.
$35
per month per seat
Pricing
Experlogix CPQ (with e-Con CPQ)PandaDoc
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Starter
$35
per month per seat
Business
$65
per month per seat
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Experlogix CPQPandaDoc
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredOptional
Additional DetailsPandaDoc offers a free eSign plan and 3 paid packages for eSigning and document automation. All plans include unlimited documents and eSignatures. Evaluations start with a free 14-day trial. Up to a 46% discount for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Experlogix CPQ (with e-Con CPQ)PandaDoc
Considered Both Products
Experlogix CPQ
Chose Experlogix CPQ
We only used this tool but in some events, we used the internal functionality that MS CRM could provide using business rules, workflows, and form changes to support the processes. CRM has no configuration tool so a third-party tool is necessary.
Chose Experlogix CPQ
The standard objects provided by Salesforce are much more apt than SAP. Out-of-the-box functionality provided by salesforce is much better than any other CRM. If we want to implement some custom workaround we can use Apex scripting which is much similar to java and is very easy …
PandaDoc
Chose PandaDoc
We've used PandaDoc at previous organizations, and we liked this the best because of how modern it looks and how easy it is to use.
Chose PandaDoc
Our office selected PandaDoc since it was better in terms of saving money. The cost was the most important factor when determining which site to use.
Chose PandaDoc
PandaDoc is a more polished, professional, and 'legitimate' software site than other solutions, since PandaDoc really specializes in creating professional proposals, quotes and invoices. The eSignature capacity and pricing table capacity embedded in the documents as well as …
Chose PandaDoc
I think PandaDoc is more modern and has a more user-friendly nature than DocuSign. We preferred Pandadoc because it allowed multiple workspaces, enabling different teams to have varying levels of access. This was incredibly useful, as it meant HR and Legal could only view …
Chose PandaDoc
I find it easier to automate and create templates in PandaDoc. Specifically the templates. Also, connecting through API is easier (our IT team says so, I'm not qualified to evaluate that). Pricing is also something important, when we acquired PandaDoc it was cheaper so we were …
Chose PandaDoc
PandaDoc is a less clunky user experience, not only on the signature process and review, but also on the document creation process.
Chose PandaDoc
PandaDoc is equal to DocuSign in every significant way except for its level of adoption; however, the pricing of PandaDoc is so much better that it's clearly the best choice for our firm.
Chose PandaDoc
ease of use and simplicity for the customer experience
Chose PandaDoc
PandaDoc has a simple, integrated eSignature component, which is our primary reason for using it over its competitors.
Chose PandaDoc
We used Dropbox back when it was still HelloSign. At the time, new templates were very hard to create. We had to upload a PDF and then add the fields from there. With PandaDoc, we are able to drag and drop the text, images, logos, and fields we need easily. This has saved our …
Chose PandaDoc
While great, HubSpot Sales Hub creates agreements and collectible payments but is not as UX/UI friendly as PandaDoc.
Chose PandaDoc
PandaDoc and DocuSign are very similar in functionality and design, but I prefer to use PandaDoc's interface. It is so easy to use and I prefer PandaDoc's interface and UI. It feels a little cleaner and a little more professional to me when compared with DocuSign's interface …
Chose PandaDoc
much better. The pricing structures worked a lot better than the other companies because we are a small clinic
Chose PandaDoc
PandaDoc provided similar features and functionality at a better price, but the "tipping point" was integrated e-signatures.
Chose PandaDoc
To be able to block certain fields within templates and contracts, so that the commercial team can negotiate the rest and adapt them but cannot change those purely legal clauses that should not be negotiated or changed without the approval of the legal department. I also find …
Chose PandaDoc
We briefly used Proposify, and it had some nice options for creating more ascetically pleasing proposals and contracts. However, it was far more time-consuming, and any gain in asceticism did not outweigh the significant loss in efficiency, simplicity, and reliability of using …
Chose PandaDoc
There is no comparison. PandaDoc is far superior to any others I've seen. That's why I moved my company over when I saw the were using docusign
Chose PandaDoc
Conga was difficult to build template contracts and not as simple to set up templates, etc., for our sales contracts as Pandadoc has been (simple drag-and-drop in Pandadoc). The automation and integration between our Salesforce and Conga accounts were not working correctly, so …
Chose PandaDoc
PandaDoc serves its purpose, but I feel it is behind large competitors like DocuSign in managing contracts.
Chose PandaDoc
We chose PandaDoc for its ease of use and tools that allow a professional feel. The convenience for our clients to review and sign agreements also helped us make the decision to go with PandaDoc.
Features
Experlogix CPQ (with e-Con CPQ)PandaDoc
CPQ
Comparison of CPQ features of Product A and Product B
Experlogix CPQ (with e-Con CPQ)
9.2
Ratings
5% above category average
PandaDoc
-
Ratings
Quote sharing/sending10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Product configuration10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Configuration options7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Pricing rules8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Price adjustment10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Purchase history and open contracts10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Guided selling/Sales portal8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
CPQ reporting & analytics10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
CPQ-CRM integration6.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Attachments to quotes10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Order capturing10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Experlogix CPQ (with e-Con CPQ)PandaDoc
Small Businesses
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Foxit eSign
Foxit eSign
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.7 out of 10
MSB Docs
MSB Docs
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Everstage
Everstage
Score 9.1 out of 10
DocuSign
DocuSign
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Experlogix CPQ (with e-Con CPQ)PandaDoc
Likelihood to Recommend
7.7
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.6
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.1
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.3
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
2.8
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.7
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
6.7
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Experlogix CPQ (with e-Con CPQ)PandaDoc
Likelihood to Recommend
If the business is related to a manufacturing company or a telecom I say it is the best CRM that you can use for maintaining the Product and Partners. Salesforce w-Con CPQ Salesforce provides a full package to the business to design their business with out-of-the-box functionalities. Handling of product, Orders, price book, Product details, Partners, Discounts, Billings, Subscriptions, Quantity, Volume discounts, Total price everything is handled by Salesforce with its standard objects itself. We can create fields whichever the business wants under the object and design the automation as per the needs. Capturing orders sending quotes and final billing all is automated and maintained by Salesforce itself with the automation rules. We can use Workflows to send automated emails when a particular condition is meet reducing the manual efforts. The area where Salesforce CPQ is less appropriate is in the case of marketing the products such as creating the Leads and converting them to accounts and contacts here Salesforce CPQ lags.
Read full review
Best suited for after demonstrations when requested by the prospect when they are looking for pricing with T&C. The data room is also great that acts like a drop box for opportunities and their contacts. Helps share pertinent information with others in the organization.
Read full review
Pros
  • It stores the products which the company has and from sending of quotes to delivery is taken care of by Salesforce through automation.
  • It has standard objects such as a price book which handles the price of the product and partners will be able to view the price of the product and see the quantity available for them and orders can be placed as per the price book.
  • Partner's data will be stored in the CPQ and as per the partner discount and volume discounts will be automatically provided at the final billing which is done through automation
  • Product features object will have the information of the product which business sells who's the parent is product and can give a high-level view to the customer what the product is all about. Making purchasing easy for the partner
  • Quotes and subscriptions will be managed by the CRM itself and using the automation rules the product order will be captured and product delivery will be maintained
Read full review
  • Allows clients to remotely execute documents.
  • Tracks the progress of document execution.
  • Emails clients to remind them to sign documents so we don't have to follow up.
  • Emails us when documents have been fully executed.
  • Provides an easy-to use interface to place signatures, dates, and other information on our forms.
Read full review
Cons
  • Designer tool, it could still be friendlier.
  • UI look designing is not that easy.
Read full review
  • I would like to see the ability to LOCK a field instead of locking an entire block or document.
  • I would like to see more standard features that need to be part of the service instead of add-ons.
  • Would like to see an option to allow different levels of users than just the two standard options.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
We have been using it for a few years now and find it vital to getting our bids out quickly and accurately to our customers. We can get a request for information from a customer and once we have their basic parameters create a professional bid in minutes. It's actually usually harder to find out what the customer wants than to use PandaDoc and create a document with it
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Once you get the hang of it, it's very easy to use. There can be a slightly steep learning curve to get fully in on the system. The new editor v2 has really improved usability and allows us to collaborate on documents simultaneously. Once the templates and library items are set up, a new document, whether it be a sales or HR document, takes very little time to complete.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
We haven't had any real issues regarding downtime as of yet.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
As I mentioned earlier - performance is near perfect as I can create, send, adjust my documents. I love the tracking feature as well as I can tell when my documents have been seen and by whom. The only issue I have run into is with saving and formatting - occasionally the file document does not save with the newly assigned name or the content of the document does not stay formatted nicely.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Recently I could not upload a pdf to a contract - support was very responsive and easy to work with. They got back to me the next day with an apparent fix - however when I opened the document nothing had changed. I then could not respond to the rep who was helping me because it was a "no-reply address", the problem still has not been solved and we had to make alternate arrangements to get this to the client. Never had it happen before and was only with this one contract.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Implementation was before the time I was here at Riafox, however, support has been great in assisting to merge spaces and upgrade to 2.0 Editor.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We only used this tool but in some events, we used the internal functionality that MS CRM could provide using business rules, workflows, and form changes to support the processes. CRM has no configuration tool so a third-party tool is necessary.
Read full review
PandaDoc is a more polished, professional, and 'legitimate' software site than other solutions, since PandaDoc really specializes in creating professional proposals, quotes and invoices. The eSignature capacity and pricing table capacity embedded in the documents as well as fillable fields, pre-made, customizable and reusable templates also make PandaDoc stand out.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
I agree. We have created folders for multiple departments and have been successful with the usage.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • More than 10 years ensuring quality quotes from the sales reps.
  • Easy copying.
  • Quick provides an good overview.
Read full review
  • We have greatly increased the efficiency in which we can get signatures from individuals for documents and increase productivity.
  • We have been able to find older documents very easily.
  • W-9 have been very difficult due to Section 3, but this was addressed with conditional logic
Read full review
ScreenShots

Experlogix CPQ Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of

PandaDoc Screenshots

Screenshot of some of the custom-designed themes, templates, embedded rich media, and interactivity to give every deal the opportunity to get noticed.Screenshot of automatic notifications, on-the-fly editing, CRM Integrations, and integrated eSignatures.Screenshot of reporting, with drill down to the deal level with proposals, to pick which deals to include (or exclude).Screenshot of legally binding eSignaturesScreenshot of centralized communications to streamline the negotiation process, and make revisions in real-time in a single location.Screenshot of document analytics that display what’s really happening after documents are sent with real-time reporting on engagement and activity on the documents. This enables teams to respond faster to prospects.