FacilityBot vs. Hippo CMMS

Hippo CMMS

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
FacilityBot	Score 10.0 out of 10	N/A	FacilityBot is a messaging-first smart facilities management system, designed to make interactions as convenient as possible for all users. FacilityBot has features of a mobile CMMS system such as fault reporting, preventive maintenance checklists, and asset management, and it also allows flexible configurations, such as configurable request forms and workflows, that allow adaption to an organisation’s unique building workflows. The digital connection established with building occupants also…	N/A
Hippo CMMS	Score 2.0 out of 10	Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)	Hippo CMMS is a maintenance management software tool for organizations of all sizes. It is a SaaS solution offering a customized interface designed to suit users' operational maintenance needs. The vendor states that Hippo’s UX design principle has always been the same: features only have value if they're easy to find and use, and so they state their layout is clean and intuitive, making the software a breeze to learn. Hippo CMMS has been providing maintenance software to…	$35 per month per user

Pricing

FacilityBot

Hippo CMMS

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Hippo Starter: $35
per month per user
Hippo Plus: $55
per month per user
Hippo Pro: $75
per month per user

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
FacilityBot	Hippo CMMS
Free Trial
Yes	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

$600 Single User

Additional Details

—

Hippo CMMS subscription pricing is determined based on the number of users. A user is anyone that needs to log in and access Hippo' s core features. Users include managers, owners, technicians, and supervisors. Maintenance requesters are not users. Price is also determined by required features. We have pricing plans for complex operations that require deeper functionality and plans for simple operations that are new to CMMS.

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	FacilityBot	Hippo CMMS
Considered Both Products	FacilityBot Verified User Anonymous Chose FacilityBot FacilityBot replaced multiple layers of coordination and communication between users and subcontractors. There are many facilities management systems that are not user-friendly on the market. Most of them do not support multiple communication methods and are costly. Unlike … Incentivized Helpful?	Hippo CMMS Verified User Anonymous Chose Hippo CMMS We used PMC before switching to Hippo [CMMS]. Hippo [CMMS] is much more user friendly and cost effective, and the paperless option was not even available through PMC at the time. The simplicity of entering PM's and work requests in Hippo [CMMS] is far superior to the previous … Incentivized Helpful? ML Melvin Larsen Hospital Tech Specialist Chose Hippo CMMS Ease of end-user to put in a task that they would like to have completed. Hippo is really easy to use and to complete tasks. If a person putting in a task includes their email or phone number we can get ahold of them to ask and questions and it lets them know progress of their … Incentivized Helpful? Tim Heath Plant Manager Chose Hippo CMMS Hippo CMMS was more user friendly for my maintenance men then the other software programs we tested. The difference was really how easy Hippo is to use navigate. Also the price point was a little better then the competitors. The calendar view really helped sell us on the … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Hippo CMMS I have used AMMS extensively. Hippo is far superior to AMMS as it is much easier to manage and much more intuitive. AMMS can be managed but it is tricky. It takes some time to learn all of the ins and outs. Hippo is much easier from the start. I have looked into Bigfoot CMMS … Incentivized Helpful? Matthew Miser Facilities Director Chose Hippo CMMS I can't remember the names of other computer maintenance software, but the main reason for the selection of Hippo CMMS was cost. Hippo CMMS came in much lower than the other CMMS' while still providing the same features and functions. Incentivized Helpful?

Best Alternatives
	FacilityBot	Hippo CMMS
Small Businesses	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
Medium-sized Companies	TOPdesk Score 8.3 out of 10	No answers on this topic
Enterprises	TOPdesk Score 8.3 out of 10	No answers on this topic
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	FacilityBot	Hippo CMMS
Likelihood to Recommend	10.0 (0 ratings)	2.0 (0 ratings)
Support Rating	- (0 ratings)	8.6 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	FacilityBot	Hippo CMMS
Likelihood to Recommend	Facilities Managers spend their days ensuring that the building operations are running smoothly and efficiently. Using FacilityBot helps them to digitize their FM workflows so that can manage their time more easily and effectively. It's all about working smarter, not harder! The asset management function of FacilityBot is also beneficial and useful. The tool also provides easy-to-read statistics reports for users. Verified User Anonymous Read full review	I find that Hippo [CMMS] is really well suited for any scenario. Most CMMS are geared toward manufacturing or industrial use, Hippo [CMMS] works as well for a school or church as it would for a factory. The ease of use for the requestor makes it an ideal platform for any institution. Incentivized MP Mark Paul Assistant Director of Facilities Read full review
Pros	Fault Reporting Asset Management Preventive Maintenance Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Tracks machine maintenance costs. Keeps preventative maintenance work orders on track. Keeps history of all past work orders for review in case a problem you've already dealt with comes up again. Incentivized Tim Heath Plant Manager Read full review
Cons	Limited checklist templates To have extension for the free trial There is room for improvement in terms of customization of simple reports. Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Mobile App - They are improving as i type this Simplified Mobile app for requester only. Not everyone needs the full CMMS Notifications of comments on completed work orders - In case I don't see a comment Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Support Rating	No answers on this topic	Customer support for Hippo CMMS has always been extremely friendly and helpful. They are quick to respond to even the simplest need. Incentivized Matthew Miser Facilities Director Read full review
Alternatives Considered	FacilityBot replaced multiple layers of coordination and communication between users and subcontractors. There are many facilities management systems that are not user-friendly on the market. Most of them do not support multiple communication methods and are costly. Unlike FacilityBot, the implementation wasn't as straightforward. In terms of features, not many are as feature-rich as FacilityBot. Verified User Anonymous Read full review	We used PMC before switching to Hippo [CMMS]. Hippo [CMMS] is much more user friendly and cost effective, and the paperless option was not even available through PMC at the time. The simplicity of entering PM's and work requests in Hippo [CMMS] is far superior to the previous system, and the customer support is much better. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	Quick and prompt fault reporting and tracking Save cost and resources FacilityBot also provides simple and evaluated statistics Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Overall Hippo has had a positive impact. The annual cost is low, and the equipment has better OEE due to better maintenance due to better tracking. It is easy to justify labor based on planned work and completed work. It is easy to assess the workload. Maintaining equipment increases production. This is a good tool for keeping equipment in good working order. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots		Hippo CMMS Screenshots