Blueworks Live is cloud-based business process management software that provides users with a collaborative environment for documenting, analyzing, and building business process mapping.
N/A
ProcessMaker
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
ProcessMaker is a process automation platform that helps organizations optimize and scale their business operations. By combining workflow automation, AI-driven decision-making, and advanced analytics, ProcessMaker empowers businesses to streamline complex processes, improve efficiency, and enhance customer experiences.
Before making the decision to get ProcessMaker, we assessed different and best options in the market, which are also quite competitive. KiSSFLOW, Blueworks Live, and Bizagi, being the most relevant and ADONIS, to mention the ones we consider the most relevant and capable of …
Features
IBM Blueworks Live
ProcessMaker
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
IBM Blueworks Live
8.2
36 Ratings
6% above category average
ProcessMaker
8.6
11 Ratings
10% above category average
Dashboards
8.018 Ratings
8.911 Ratings
Standard reports
9.035 Ratings
8.911 Ratings
Custom reports
7.732 Ratings
8.09 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
IBM Blueworks Live
7.7
36 Ratings
8% below category average
ProcessMaker
8.9
10 Ratings
20% above category average
Process designer
8.335 Ratings
9.99 Ratings
Process simulation
8.331 Ratings
8.28 Ratings
Business rules engine
5.932 Ratings
9.99 Ratings
SOA support
7.829 Ratings
9.910 Ratings
Process player
8.232 Ratings
8.08 Ratings
Support for modeling languages
7.334 Ratings
00 Ratings
Form builder
8.016 Ratings
7.98 Ratings
Model execution
7.716 Ratings
8.28 Ratings
Collaboration
Comparison of Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
IBM Blueworks Live
8.5
37 Ratings
2% above category average
ProcessMaker
-
Ratings
Social collaboration tools
8.537 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content Management Capabilties
Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Product A and Product B
IBM Blueworks Live
6.2
33 Ratings
27% below category average
ProcessMaker
-
Ratings
Content management
6.233 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
IBM Blueworks Live
-
Ratings
ProcessMaker
7.8
3 Ratings
7% above category average
API for custom integration
00 Ratings
7.83 Ratings
Business Process Automation
Comparison of Business Process Automation features of Product A and Product B
Pharmacies are subject to several regulatory obligations, including FDA and HIPAA rules. Pharmacy teams may record and view compliance-related procedures in a uniform format with IBM BLueworks Live. This facilitates Audit tracking, ensures process compliance at every stage, and keeps audits running smoothly.
The task mining component is well suited for processes where there are a lot of steps performed in a variety of systems, particularly by a single individual on a team. It also requires a robust activity ID to be able to track an activity. It is not well suited when trying to track a process where the content is in an email.
User interface. It is clean and easy to understand. You won't get overwhelmed the second you log in.
The workflow maker. With a drag and drop interface, you can easily visualize and implement what you want on the screen. Out of all the programs we tested, this one had the easiest process maker and designer.
Ease of understanding. My biggest recommendation would be that this program is easy to access for anyone. There are complications (see negatives) but this program can be implemented quickly and efficiently, and nearly anyone can learn to use it. You will not feel like you are in the dark with it.
Complications when you get to the more advanced pieces. When trialing, I found that the more advanced a process got, the more complicated it got for me in coding. When you begin using the more advanced features, you will find that you need to have a basic knowledge of coding - otherwise you won't go any further. This was my sole issue. Unfortunately, it was one that would have brought the school to a grinding halt if they were to ever get more complicated than they were.
I gave this overall rating for ProcessMaker due to its overall flexibility, design and ease of use for most. Examples of this from us include it being an excellent and trustworthy tool for automating processes, the abilities and capabilities for real-time process tracking and the web-based accessibility and implementation which allows for easy access and management of the tool.
Blueworks Live was part of a project deal. We did not keep it after the project. We found there are many solutions offering similar or superior capabilities - the fact that Blueworks does not fully support the universal BPMN standard was a big letdown for us. The pricing also did not make sense as a standalone solution.
Before making the decision to get ProcessMaker, we assessed different and best options in the market, which are also quite competitive. KiSSFLOW, Blueworks Live, and Bizagi, being the most relevant and ADONIS, to mention the ones we consider the most relevant and capable of meeting our needs. In the end, we went for ProcessMaker because of mainly three things as described before: 1. Real-time process status tracking. 2. Metrics and dashboards. 3. Ease of use for constructing diagrams.
The capability is robust and quite industry agnostic. It would benefit significantly with some out of the box models - e.g. procure to pay on SAP and similar. They could also develop industry specific examples which could kickstart the implementation for organizations.
It has helped us reduce miscommunication between our departments, such as production, inventory, and shipping, thus reducing delays.
Now, most things are automated; we can quickly know when a product will be in low stock.
With the help of custom charts, we are easily able to determine our best-selling product of the month and week, which helps us market according to stats.
I'm using Communication edition to introduce BPMN in my organization. I can build the first process in a short time, make my boss more confident with my job.
But, with ProcessMaker, we need more time to design code to handle the process, and without PHP/Javascript Programmer, it seems hard to work with more and more processes online.
However, IE Browser is not well supported, somewhat let the user confuse.