Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. Oracle PeopleSoft ERP

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.N/A
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
Oracle's PeopleSoft ERP (or PeopleSoft FSCM) is a software solution used to reduce costs by automating and centralizing global transactional processes and the enterprise entire supply chain. Oracle states they have extended support for PeopleSoft to 2034.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle PeopleSoft ERP
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle PeopleSoft ERP
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle PeopleSoft ERP
Considered Both Products
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
I have pitched GP against every competitor in the market - NetSuite, PeopleSoft, Sage, SAP, Oracle, Quickbooks. This product is a mid-market solution and is geared toward standard accounting practice-type companies. If you do not have the sufficient level of accounting …
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP

No answer on this topic

Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle PeopleSoft ERP
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.6
17 Ratings
12% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
6.2
18 Ratings
15% below category average
Pay calculation6.116 Ratings6.018 Ratings
Benefit plan administration7.012 Ratings6.017 Ratings
Direct deposit files7.016 Ratings5.018 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management7.015 Ratings00 Ratings
Reimbursement management6.014 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
7.0
25 Ratings
1% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
10.0
20 Ratings
32% above category average
API for custom integration7.024 Ratings10.019 Ratings
Plug-ins7.019 Ratings10.016 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.6
36 Ratings
19% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
10.0
25 Ratings
21% above category average
Single sign-on capability6.129 Ratings10.021 Ratings
Role-based user permissions7.136 Ratings10.024 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
37 Ratings
12% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
9.3
26 Ratings
29% above category average
Dashboards7.025 Ratings10.022 Ratings
Standard reports7.035 Ratings8.025 Ratings
Custom reports6.035 Ratings10.025 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
44 Ratings
10% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
8.3
29 Ratings
8% above category average
Accounts payable6.041 Ratings8.125 Ratings
Accounts receivable7.032 Ratings7.724 Ratings
Cash management6.032 Ratings00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation6.037 Ratings00 Ratings
Expense management7.027 Ratings00 Ratings
Time tracking7.013 Ratings00 Ratings
Fixed asset management6.025 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-currency support8.017 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-division support7.025 Ratings00 Ratings
Regulations compliance6.111 Ratings00 Ratings
Electronic tax filing7.011 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-service portal7.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Global Financial Support6.07 Ratings9.016 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers7.018 Ratings10.024 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting6.016 Ratings00 Ratings
Localizations8.011 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations7.022 Ratings10.024 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting6.114 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting7.014 Ratings10.020 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework6.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes7.015 Ratings10.019 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.8
24 Ratings
3% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
6.0
12 Ratings
27% below category average
Inventory tracking7.022 Ratings7.011 Ratings
Automatic reordering6.012 Ratings5.09 Ratings
Location management8.017 Ratings7.011 Ratings
Manufacturing module6.013 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
22 Ratings
10% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
7.8
9 Ratings
0% above category average
Pricing6.016 Ratings8.07 Ratings
Order entry7.019 Ratings10.08 Ratings
Credit card processing7.011 Ratings5.05 Ratings
Cost of goods sold6.022 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Order Orchestration8.07 Ratings8.53 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility7.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Order exception Resolution6.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
8.1
25 Ratings
9% above category average
Billing Management00 Ratings10.018 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management00 Ratings8.015 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management00 Ratings5.113 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting00 Ratings8.713 Ratings
Period Close00 Ratings10.020 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
7.4
12 Ratings
3% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting00 Ratings7.012 Ratings
Project Costing00 Ratings7.111 Ratings
Cost Capture00 Ratings7.110 Ratings
Capital Project Management00 Ratings8.310 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance00 Ratings8.710 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition00 Ratings8.310 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
6.9
8 Ratings
1% above category average
Project Planning and Scheduling00 Ratings8.08 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers00 Ratings7.07 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality00 Ratings8.07 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools00 Ratings7.07 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
9.3
10 Ratings
21% above category average
Award Lifecycle Management00 Ratings8.79 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
6.5
17 Ratings
7% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared00 Ratings6.09 Ratings
Contract Authoring00 Ratings6.07 Ratings
Contract Repository00 Ratings8.011 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated00 Ratings8.013 Ratings
Supplier Management00 Ratings10.011 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
5.2
3 Ratings
22% below category average
Risk Repository00 Ratings5.03 Ratings
Control Management00 Ratings5.03 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments00 Ratings6.03 Ratings
Issue Detection00 Ratings5.03 Ratings
Remediation and Certification00 Ratings5.03 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
9.0
2 Ratings
27% above category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Fulfillment Management00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
8.7
4 Ratings
14% above category average
Production Process Design00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
Production Management00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Configuration Management00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Work Execution00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
7.4
10 Ratings
2% above category average
Forecasting00 Ratings7.010 Ratings
Inventory Planning00 Ratings7.09 Ratings
Performance Monitoring00 Ratings7.09 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
8.9
3 Ratings
20% above category average
Proposal Management00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Product Master Data Management00 Ratings8.53 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle PeopleSoft ERP
Small Businesses
Dext Prepare (with Receipt Bank)
Dext Prepare (with Receipt Bank)
Score 9.1 out of 10
Acumatica
Acumatica
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Accounting Seed
Accounting Seed
Score 8.3 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Score 8.1 out of 10
SAP Business ByDesign
SAP Business ByDesign
Score 7.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle PeopleSoft ERP
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(50 ratings)
10.0
(40 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.9
(7 ratings)
10.0
(3 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(6 ratings)
5.0
(3 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(2 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(5 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.2
(3 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle PeopleSoft ERP
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
A large company where users have one function- for instance, where someone only receives or works in payables. That minimizes the number of windows they need. A smaller company where one user does multiple functions will require a lot more training and user knowledge to navigate, and it makes it harder to secure users. You also have to understand that GP started life as Great Plains, designed for accountants. The other modules were added on after Microsoft bought Great Plains, which means that modules like Manufacturing are red-headed step children with much smaller support ecosystems. So, if you're starting fresh, you may want to look at something built for the mobile world. D365 and Business Central are a lot more money, buggy, and hard to customize and essentially still vaporware. Microsoft is heavily investing there, leading to the previously mentioned question about the future of GP. If I was starting today I would be hard pressed to justify jumping into GP in a world where Salesforce ties in with so many programs. GP has MRP but it is limited so it's hard to justify a manufacturer starting with GP today.
Read full review
Oracle
You really need a big enterprise to take advantage of PeopleSoft. It is not entirely user-friendly, and it often requires massive amounts of customization to make it work for layers if you will. Business experts can figure it out, but if you are expecting someone to easily learn how to use the timekeeping modules without heavy customization, it's really not for you. You need to know going in, that this is not for a small business at all, and not even a medium-sized enterprise. It's geared to massive organizations that need to integrate business processes over geographic areas and multiple departments.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • User friendly interface
  • Able to be extended into multiple areas of your business
  • One feature we have been using for a few years is EFT for payables - it has significantly reduced the time spent paying vendors and reduced our check printing and mailing costs. It is very easy to setup and use.
Read full review
Oracle
  • One of the best thing it does is it is customizable. You can implement any business logic you need. This is one of the very key assets of PeopleSoft Financials.
  • PeopleSoft Financials's accounting methods are in line with industry standards. You can use the process as is and ledger will be taken care of.
  • It supports multiple ways to integrate with other systems.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • With respect to the allocations, once the expense is entered into the allocation account, you lose the ability to run any detail on just the total of the expense. It would be nice if you could run a trial balance on the allocation accounts the same way you can with regular accounts.
  • I've always thought security set up could be a bit simpler. It actually has gotten better through the years. Specifically, with eight separate entities, it would be nice to have a "master" setup where you could call up one group entity, assign the users rights, and then be finished. Currently, whenever I have a new user, I have to call up each individual entity and select all of the features I want the user to have. That means I have to do eight steps for each user.
Read full review
Oracle
  • PeopleSoft Financials does not address the needs of small organizations that do not have a large enough staff to maintain the software or utilize the features it provides as it requires a moderate staff to keep track of all of the transactions and processing
  • PeopleSoft licensing costs are significant, which are relative to the features provided but in many cases those features may not be necessary
  • PeopleSoft licensing structures can be frustrating at times when certain modules would allow you to perform the complex task needed but it would require the entire module to be licensed for just that one feature (e.g. Cash Management for loading bank statements in certain formats)
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
Read full review
Oracle
PRISM is a great tool to track and watch numerous financial documents. I would like to see more of an integration platform that would control tracking for specific project details. There is currently only a little section for job notes which I would like to see improve. I think navigation could be improved, but isn't the worst compared to some platforms I have worked with as it provides a tree like structure on the backend which helps synchronize information together for fiscal financials.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
Though it is a basic accounting package, I believe some users do not find the old style menus and navigation options intuitive. There is also a great lack of training resources in the market, so users have to learn the product without guidance a lot, resulting in inefficient workflows and misuse or misunderstanding of many features.
Read full review
Oracle
I am aware of better systems, but this is what the employer I work for has to offer. Overall, there are fewer negatives than positives so I would support the usability. New staff members can quickly obtain access and go through a 5-10 minute training video that we build in house. The speed at which someone can become a proficient user speaks to the usability of ePro.
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
The rating is directed to the thrid party serive provider that we use. I do not now how good the Microsoft direct support is.
Read full review
Oracle
I can't give them a perfect rating because it does often take a long time and usually more [expensive] to resolve trying issues that cannot be solved by our in-house team. PeopleSoft is complicated, and the mix and match of user-created and stock modules cause problems very often. These usually require more customization to completely fix, requiring more money spent with
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
Read full review
Oracle
I recommend that everyone pay special attention to developing a solid testing and training plan if you are even thinking of implementing PeopleSoft. Be ready to obtain good trainers and developers, otherwise, your journey can be unnecessarily painful and much more expensive. Try to stay with an implementation partner who really has your needs at heart, and actually takes the time to understand your organization!
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
I come from a strong background of using SAP. SAP doesn't have the flexibility of GP, an example would be SAP doesn't allow core mods, if they catch you, you lose support. Microsoft doesn't really care about mods, but they will be quick to have the vendor you used support your issue if it is caused by those mods. With SAP your company adapts to the software, where with GP you adapt the software to you.
Read full review
Oracle
PeopleSoft is much more appropriate for large organizations than the software programs listed here. I'm involved in a project to bring billing and accounts receivable functions out of "shadow systems" like those listed here and into PeopleSoft, and PeopleSoft is more robust, flexible, and standardizable. We've found it to be an excellent solution.
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft
The functionality that GP and related ISV solutions offer and the ease of integration of GP to other systems makes it an extremely scalable solution
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP allows my clients to move from a paper or spreadsheet based company to an integrated, electronic, streamlined business. I love being able to help clients gain efficiencies through the use of Microsoft Dynamics GP.
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP allows for better customer service because everything is at our fingertips. If someone calls questioning an invoice, we can easily look it up. If someone calls stating they paid an invoice with a certain check number, we can quickly run a query to find that particular check number to see where it was applied.
  • Having everything on a single platform provides ease of use for upgrades, backups and end user training. There is only one software to learn!
Read full review
Oracle
  • Provides better controls to ensure that spend does not increase beyond the PO amount.
  • sPro reverse invoicing provides a mechanism to only pay our staff aug firms for only the hours that entered into PeopleSoft. There is no more reconciliation between the vendor invoices and the hours that were charged within the internal time tracking system.
  • PeopleSoft Financials increases employee efficiency through the use of dashboards and work centers.
Read full review
ScreenShots