Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. Oracle PeopleSoft ERP

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Score 5.2 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.N/A
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
Oracle's PeopleSoft ERP (or PeopleSoft FSCM) is a software solution used to reduce costs by automating and centralizing global transactional processes and the enterprise entire supply chain. Oracle states they have extended support for PeopleSoft to 2034.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle PeopleSoft ERP
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle PeopleSoft ERP
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle PeopleSoft ERP
Considered Both Products
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
I have pitched GP against every competitor in the market - NetSuite, PeopleSoft, Sage, SAP, Oracle, Quickbooks. This product is a mid-market solution and is geared toward standard accounting practice-type companies. If you do not have the sufficient level of accounting …
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP

No answer on this topic

Features
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle PeopleSoft ERP
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.4
20 Ratings
17% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
7.4
20 Ratings
1% above category average
Pay calculation6.319 Ratings8.020 Ratings
Benefit plan administration5.915 Ratings6.018 Ratings
Direct deposit files7.518 Ratings9.019 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management6.517 Ratings00 Ratings
Reimbursement management6.016 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.3
27 Ratings
55% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
3.3
22 Ratings
77% below category average
API for custom integration2.526 Ratings3.321 Ratings
Plug-ins6.021 Ratings3.318 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
7.0
40 Ratings
16% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
9.0
29 Ratings
7% above category average
Single sign-on capability5.932 Ratings8.925 Ratings
Role-based user permissions8.240 Ratings9.127 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.4
41 Ratings
36% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
6.1
30 Ratings
18% below category average
Dashboards3.529 Ratings6.026 Ratings
Standard reports6.239 Ratings7.628 Ratings
Custom reports6.539 Ratings4.728 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.1
48 Ratings
39% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
7.5
33 Ratings
2% below category average
Accounts payable6.445 Ratings7.027 Ratings
Accounts receivable5.936 Ratings6.526 Ratings
Cash management6.436 Ratings00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation5.741 Ratings00 Ratings
Expense management4.531 Ratings00 Ratings
Time tracking8.014 Ratings00 Ratings
Fixed asset management4.628 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-currency support2.919 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-division support3.026 Ratings00 Ratings
Regulations compliance3.314 Ratings00 Ratings
Electronic tax filing9.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-service portal7.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Global Financial Support6.07 Ratings6.518 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers4.721 Ratings7.125 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting3.918 Ratings00 Ratings
Localizations4.513 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations4.726 Ratings7.125 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting2.916 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting4.117 Ratings6.221 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework3.814 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes6.219 Ratings7.523 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.6
26 Ratings
46% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
8.0
13 Ratings
1% above category average
Inventory tracking6.324 Ratings8.912 Ratings
Automatic reordering1.013 Ratings9.010 Ratings
Location management4.018 Ratings8.912 Ratings
Manufacturing module4.615 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
3.7
25 Ratings
68% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
8.2
10 Ratings
5% above category average
Pricing3.618 Ratings8.08 Ratings
Order entry3.621 Ratings9.09 Ratings
Credit card processing1.012 Ratings7.96 Ratings
Cost of goods sold5.225 Ratings9.05 Ratings
Order Orchestration5.49 Ratings9.04 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility3.812 Ratings00 Ratings
Order exception Resolution3.57 Ratings00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
7.6
29 Ratings
2% above category average
Billing Management00 Ratings9.020 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management00 Ratings8.017 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management00 Ratings3.615 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting00 Ratings6.417 Ratings
Period Close00 Ratings7.822 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
7.4
12 Ratings
2% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting00 Ratings7.012 Ratings
Project Costing00 Ratings7.111 Ratings
Cost Capture00 Ratings7.110 Ratings
Capital Project Management00 Ratings8.310 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance00 Ratings8.710 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition00 Ratings8.310 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
7.3
9 Ratings
4% above category average
Project Planning and Scheduling00 Ratings9.09 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers00 Ratings8.98 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality00 Ratings9.08 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools00 Ratings8.08 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
9.5
11 Ratings
25% above category average
Award Lifecycle Management00 Ratings9.010 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
6.7
18 Ratings
4% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared00 Ratings8.010 Ratings
Contract Authoring00 Ratings9.08 Ratings
Contract Repository00 Ratings9.012 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated00 Ratings7.014 Ratings
Supplier Management00 Ratings9.012 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
7.2
4 Ratings
8% above category average
Risk Repository00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Control Management00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Issue Detection00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Remediation and Certification00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
8.8
3 Ratings
25% above category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization00 Ratings8.03 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management00 Ratings8.03 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management00 Ratings7.03 Ratings
Fulfillment Management00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
9.1
5 Ratings
21% above category average
Production Process Design00 Ratings6.04 Ratings
Production Management00 Ratings9.95 Ratings
Configuration Management00 Ratings9.95 Ratings
Work Execution00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs00 Ratings9.95 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
9.1
11 Ratings
24% above category average
Forecasting00 Ratings8.911 Ratings
Inventory Planning00 Ratings9.910 Ratings
Performance Monitoring00 Ratings8.910 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
8.6
4 Ratings
17% above category average
Proposal Management00 Ratings7.03 Ratings
Product Master Data Management00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle PeopleSoft ERP
Small Businesses
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Score 6.3 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Zoho Books
Zoho Books
Score 9.1 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Score 7.6 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle PeopleSoft ERP
Likelihood to Recommend
6.0
(51 ratings)
6.4
(43 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.9
(7 ratings)
10.0
(3 ratings)
Usability
6.0
(7 ratings)
6.3
(6 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(2 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(5 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.2
(3 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle PeopleSoft ERP
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Microsoft Dynamics GP is well-suited for our environment, as we pay a diverse group of employees, including on-the-road drivers, shop employees (some in other locations), and office employees. It easily tracks time off, taxes, pay, etc. The reporting allows us to verify with our drivers how they are paid each week, whether it be through mileage or stop-offs.
Read full review
Oracle
You really need a big enterprise to take advantage of PeopleSoft. It is not entirely user-friendly, and it often requires massive amounts of customization to make it work for layers if you will. Business experts can figure it out, but if you are expecting someone to easily learn how to use the timekeeping modules without heavy customization, it's really not for you. You need to know going in, that this is not for a small business at all, and not even a medium-sized enterprise. It's geared to massive organizations that need to integrate business processes over geographic areas and multiple departments.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Great Plains started as back office/accounting, and that is still it's strong suit.
  • SQL and the GP programming language, Dexterity, provide a robust, scalable, and stable platform with well documented maintenance and repair procedures. Relatively easy to manage, tune, and support.
  • Microsoft support for GP verges on "particularly well". Doesn't quite get there but good enough once you know what you're doing
  • Strong partner network, including the GP User Group (GPUG)
Read full review
Oracle
  • One of the best thing it does is it is customizable. You can implement any business logic you need. This is one of the very key assets of PeopleSoft Financials.
  • PeopleSoft Financials's accounting methods are in line with industry standards. You can use the process as is and ledger will be taken care of.
  • It supports multiple ways to integrate with other systems.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • With respect to the allocations, once the expense is entered into the allocation account, you lose the ability to run any detail on just the total of the expense. It would be nice if you could run a trial balance on the allocation accounts the same way you can with regular accounts.
  • I've always thought security set up could be a bit simpler. It actually has gotten better through the years. Specifically, with eight separate entities, it would be nice to have a "master" setup where you could call up one group entity, assign the users rights, and then be finished. Currently, whenever I have a new user, I have to call up each individual entity and select all of the features I want the user to have. That means I have to do eight steps for each user.
Read full review
Oracle
  • PeopleSoft Financials does not address the needs of small organizations that do not have a large enough staff to maintain the software or utilize the features it provides as it requires a moderate staff to keep track of all of the transactions and processing
  • PeopleSoft licensing costs are significant, which are relative to the features provided but in many cases those features may not be necessary
  • PeopleSoft licensing structures can be frustrating at times when certain modules would allow you to perform the complex task needed but it would require the entire module to be licensed for just that one feature (e.g. Cash Management for loading bank statements in certain formats)
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
Read full review
Oracle
PRISM is a great tool to track and watch numerous financial documents. I would like to see more of an integration platform that would control tracking for specific project details. There is currently only a little section for job notes which I would like to see improve. I think navigation could be improved, but isn't the worst compared to some platforms I have worked with as it provides a tree like structure on the backend which helps synchronize information together for fiscal financials.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
Though it is a basic accounting package, I believe some users do not find the old style menus and navigation options intuitive. There is also a great lack of training resources in the market, so users have to learn the product without guidance a lot, resulting in inefficient workflows and misuse or misunderstanding of many features.
Read full review
Oracle
The usability is very outdated In my opinion. The screens resemble those of Windows 3.1. Too many clicks and drop-downs or clicks to go to a new screen. The business logic also appears dated and requires an update. Overall, it does not have a pleasing User Interface and should be refreshed, or a new interface should be built from the ground up.
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
The rating is directed to the thrid party serive provider that we use. I do not now how good the Microsoft direct support is.
Read full review
Oracle
I can't give them a perfect rating because it does often take a long time and usually more [expensive] to resolve trying issues that cannot be solved by our in-house team. PeopleSoft is complicated, and the mix and match of user-created and stock modules cause problems very often. These usually require more customization to completely fix, requiring more money spent with
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
Read full review
Oracle
I recommend that everyone pay special attention to developing a solid testing and training plan if you are even thinking of implementing PeopleSoft. Be ready to obtain good trainers and developers, otherwise, your journey can be unnecessarily painful and much more expensive. Try to stay with an implementation partner who really has your needs at heart, and actually takes the time to understand your organization!
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
I come from a strong background of using SAP. SAP doesn't have the flexibility of GP, an example would be SAP doesn't allow core mods, if they catch you, you lose support. Microsoft doesn't really care about mods, but they will be quick to have the vendor you used support your issue if it is caused by those mods. With SAP your company adapts to the software, where with GP you adapt the software to you.
Read full review
Oracle
PeopleSoft is much more appropriate for large organizations than the software programs listed here. I'm involved in a project to bring billing and accounts receivable functions out of "shadow systems" like those listed here and into PeopleSoft, and PeopleSoft is more robust, flexible, and standardizable. We've found it to be an excellent solution.
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft
The functionality that GP and related ISV solutions offer and the ease of integration of GP to other systems makes it an extremely scalable solution
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP allows my clients to move from a paper or spreadsheet based company to an integrated, electronic, streamlined business. I love being able to help clients gain efficiencies through the use of Microsoft Dynamics GP.
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP allows for better customer service because everything is at our fingertips. If someone calls questioning an invoice, we can easily look it up. If someone calls stating they paid an invoice with a certain check number, we can quickly run a query to find that particular check number to see where it was applied.
  • Having everything on a single platform provides ease of use for upgrades, backups and end user training. There is only one software to learn!
Read full review
Oracle
  • Provides better controls to ensure that spend does not increase beyond the PO amount.
  • sPro reverse invoicing provides a mechanism to only pay our staff aug firms for only the hours that entered into PeopleSoft. There is no more reconciliation between the vendor invoices and the hours that were charged within the internal time tracking system.
  • PeopleSoft Financials increases employee efficiency through the use of dashboards and work centers.
Read full review
ScreenShots