Plagiarism Detector (plagiarismdetector.net) vs. Sterling Check

Plagiarismdetector.net is simple and easy to
use in mobile applications for iOS and Android devices.

Plagiarismdetector.net is a fantastic app as
it works on the site and is compatible with all versions of Windows.

Plagiarismdetector.net is effective in
detecting copied content using a formula.

Incentivized

SterlingOne has had my background check in progress for nearly a month. I spoke with them 5 days ago about the issue and discovered there was a criminal record flag in Connecticut. I have never been to Connecticut. They said this can often happen if an individual has the same name, birthday, or last four digits of SSN. This is clearly a flaw in their system if someone with the same name or birthday can appear on the same background check. I feel bad for any John Smith who applies for a job with a company that uses SterlingOne, they'll never get past the screening. Not only is this a flawed system, but when I spoke with customer service about this, they guaranteed they would expedite this within 24-48 hours. It has now been 5 days and when I called back, they said they would expedite this as if I had never called in the first place. I have been through numerous background checks for work in my life, I have done live scans and had my fingerprints taken, and have been approved to work with children with special needs (which requires a very rigorous screening) and I have never experienced such a disjointed and unprofessional process.

• It is a unique complement when making texts and the plagiarism test is done immediately.
• With the effectiveness that it is a page with the most effective results in search of plagiarism.
• Accurate results plus offers an analysis of any software against a duplicate copy.

Incentivized

• The initiation of a background check is very simple by only needing the name and email of the new candidate and submitting that as the new ticket.
• Sterling communicates with the new candidate to keep the background check moving which saves us time by not needing to keep a close eye on the process of the background check.
• Sterling communicates with the employer to let them know if additional charges are needed to run the background check and we can either approve or deny the charge.

Incentivized

• In principle, it provides a limit of 2,000 characters per analysis and only searches for matches using Bing technology, but by registering on the web for free, the character limitation disappears and the possibilities of its search engine are expanded

Incentivized

• In my opinion, Horrible new platform "Sterling check"
• No designated account representative
• In my experience, Poor troubleshooting support
• Customer service often doesn't answer questions
• Many back and forth needed to resolve issues
• Recently changed platform and not offering the same services

Incentivized

• Sterling Talent is an excellent company for performing the background checks for our new hires. However, the delay in processing times can be improved.
• Also, there should be automation from legacy systems to pick up the candidate details as much as possible instead of asking for more details from the candidate via email.

Incentivized

They really have a lot of similarities, they all help you detect plagiarism and correct grammar. Grammarly helps you create authentic texts without grammatical errors, and Dupli checker helps you review texts to avoid all repeated texts or copied/pasted texts from another internet source, which helps you avoid plagiarism. Copyleaks, just like Dupli Checker and Plagiarism Detector, helps you detect plagiarism in your projects, texts, and URLs. My preference for Plagiarism Detector is that I can check the grammar, check that the texts are authentic, and convert all files from PDF to Word.

Incentivized

We had no issues with HireRight. The system worked well and we had excellent service. The only reason we selected Sterling is we changed our ATS to Compas and wanted to be integrated with a background check company. Sterling was only one of two options and offered onboarding capabilities. The other did not

Incentivized

• The main page is clumsy, and there are too many popups.
• There are presently no features or aspects of this program that I hate.

Incentivized

• Quick results allow us to hire people in short time frames and get them onboarded quickly.
• The product, and the customer service team, doesn't require much management from a vendor relations perspective.

Incentivized