Cisco Hyperflex
Overall Satisfaction with Cisco HyperFlex
We resold a variety of hyperconverged infrastructure solutions including Nutanix, HPE Simplivity, Cisco Hyperflex and others. Typically these are bought by customers who are looking for flexible in-house storage for their own private clouds running on a hypervisor like VMware. (I am ignoring the cloud extensions of these products for purposes of this review)
- Hyperflex has a good handle on data redundancy.
- Snapshots work well in VMware and provide added value beyond the traditional VMware snapshot.
- Installation is straightforward.
- Too much integration with Cisco UCS fabric interconnects is required, which makes the product most useful for customers who already have Cisco UCS. Options without fabric interconnects are limited.
- Hyper-V integration is way behind (but to be fair I think that's true for most vendors in this space).
- I don't have much to say about ROI; however, its ease of installation guarantees that the product will generally be installed quickly.
Compares favorably to Nutanix and SimpliVity. Nutanix however has been around longer and has a bigger feature set than Hyperflex, which is in Nutanix's favor. However, while Nutanix does everything, it doesn't always do everything well.
SimpliVity on the other hand tends to work well in environments where data redundancy and replication is the most important factor.
SimpliVity on the other hand tends to work well in environments where data redundancy and replication is the most important factor.
I haven't had an opportunity to test a Hyperflex deployment with Intersight yet (although I do like Intersight). In general, though, Hyperflex installation is pretty straightforward and compares well to other products in this space.
Installation is admittedly more complicated if you're installing into a Brownfield pair of fabric interconnects.
Installation is admittedly more complicated if you're installing into a Brownfield pair of fabric interconnects.
I can't comment on this in too much detail, as I used it working for a reseller. However, most of the day-to-day administration is done through the vSphere client, meaning that it's pretty transparent to VMware admins. I can't speak to the Hyper-V integration, as I haven't used that myself.
Intersight has been useful for my customers in terms of managing their hardware and service calls. There was an issue with hard drive firmware updates that customers needed to prevent data issues that Intersight users were able to clear up pretty quickly. Unfortunately I haven't had a chance to use Intersight with Hyperflex extensively.
Do you think Cisco HyperFlex delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Cisco HyperFlex's feature set?
Yes
Did Cisco HyperFlex live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Cisco HyperFlex go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Cisco HyperFlex again?
Yes