PureCloud super charged our Contact Center
Overall Satisfaction with Genesys Cloud CX (formerly Genesys Cloud)
We use Genesys Cloud across every department in our organization. It powers our Contact Center with key features like ACD, IVR, omnichannel support, workforce management, quality management, real-time analytics, and more. Their API first microservices architecture has allowed our developers to integrate our line of business and mobile applications for improved productivity and customer service.
Pros
- Developer friendly APIs
- Real-time information
- Quality management
- Workforce management
- Predictive routing
Cons
- Support
- Implementation
- Improved stability
- 248% ROI
- Reduced average handle times by 10%
- Increased staff productivity
- Improved quality
Do you think Genesys Cloud CX delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Genesys Cloud CX's feature set?
Yes
Did Genesys Cloud CX live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Genesys Cloud CX go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Genesys Cloud CX again?
Yes
Genesys Cloud CX Feature Ratings
Using Genesys Cloud CX (formerly Genesys Cloud)
80 - Contact Center, IT, and Client Services.
1 - We rely on Inflow CX mostly to support Genesys Cloud CX.
- Insurance Incident Intake
- Nurse Triage
- Provider Verifications (outbound)
- Support Services
- Application integration
- Workforce Management
- Analytics and Reporting
- Innovation
- Additional Cost Savings
- Beating our competitors
Evaluating Genesys Cloud CX (formerly Genesys Cloud) and Competitors
Yes - Mitel on premise Contact Center
- Price
- Product Features
- Product Usability
- Product Reputation
One stop shop -- most other CCaaS vendors require multiple platforms vendors to offer the same functionality.
I would start with working with Inflow CX for all Professional Services and support.
- Avaya, Five9 Virtual Contact Center, Mitel Applications Suite, NICE CXone (formerly NICE inContact) and MiCloud Connect (formerly ShoreTel)
Genesys Cloud was the only product architected for the cloud from the ground up. Designed with an API first approach and including a comprehensive set of features. The competitors we evaluated relied on other vendors to round out their service offering. We weren’t interested in deploying and integrating 2/3 products Genesys combines everything we needed into one well-designed solution.
Genesys Cloud CX (formerly Genesys Cloud) Implementation
- Third-party professional services
Genesys helped us implement initally, Inflow CX handles this now.
Yes -
- Lift and Shift
- Roll out Scheduling and other WFM functionality
- Analytics and Reporting including Balanced Scorecard
- Continuous Optimization
Change management was a minor issue with the implementation - Go slow to go fast
- Changing resources on the team
- Time Zone differences
- Shift from on premise to cloud
- SIP Provider
Genesys Cloud CX (formerly Genesys Cloud) Support
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
None | None |
Yes, but not through Genesys. We selected Inflow CX.
Yes - Yes.
Inflow always provides amazing support. In several instances I have received calls from our support team prompting me to consider implementing a new feature that would result in some improvement.
Using Genesys Cloud CX (formerly Genesys Cloud)
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Like to use Relatively simple Easy to use Technical support not required Well integrated Consistent Quick to learn Convenient Feel confident using Familiar | None |
- Developing against their APIs
- Agent Experience - Basic call controls
- Workforce Scheduling and Forecasting
- Designing Call Flows
- Complex Call Flows
- User Profile Administration
Yes - Works well -- somewhat limited in functionality.
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation