Best in the business for QA
May 03, 2023
Best in the business for QA
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Litmus
We use Litmus regularly to QA our emails. Whereas some ESPs have email client rendering proofing built within their platform, I've found it typically doesn't compare to the quality and interface of the Litmus renderings. In a few minutes I can check to make sure the email is appearing how it should across all major clients in addition to checking other key sections such as subject line/preheaders as well as links and UTMs.
- Client Rendering
- Code Fixes
- QA links and UTMs
- Sometimes clients take a while to load
- Sometimes client rendering for specific providers is down
- Fewer mistakes in deployments
- Easier launches
We don't use this feature within Litmus
Email QA takes considerably less time using Litmus as a QA tool. I can't imagine the hoops I'd have to go through to ensure perfect rendering on dozens of clients without this tool. In addition to client rendering, it has been so easy to check other QA list items such as subject lines and preheaders, links and UTM tags across all of our emails.
Do you think Litmus delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Litmus's feature set?
Yes
Did Litmus live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Litmus go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Litmus again?
Yes