What users are saying about
74 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>Score 7.7 out of 100
Based on 74 reviews and ratings
11 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>Score 7.2 out of 100
Based on 11 reviews and ratings
Feature Set Ratings
Testing and Experimentation

8.1
AB Tasty
81%
Coveo Relevance Cloud
Feature Set Not Supported
N/A
AB Tasty ranks higher in 12/12 features
AB Tasty ranks higher in 12/12 features
a/b experiment testing

8.5
85%
17 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Split URL testing

8.6
86%
12 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Multivariate testing

8.0
80%
14 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing

7.4
74%
12 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Mobile app testing

7.8
78%
4 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor

8.0
80%
13 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Advanced code editor

8.2
82%
4 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Page surveys

7.3
73%
2 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Preview mode

8.0
80%
4 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Experiment scheduler

8.2
82%
3 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Client-side tests

8.9
89%
4 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests

8.2
82%
2 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting

8.6
AB Tasty
86%
Coveo Relevance Cloud
Feature Set Not Supported
N/A
AB Tasty ranks higher in 4/4 features
AB Tasty ranks higher in 4/4 features
Standard visitor segmentation

8.5
85%
15 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation

8.5
85%
13 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Traffic allocation control

8.7
87%
16 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Website personalization

8.8
88%
14 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Results and Analysis

7.8
AB Tasty
78%
Coveo Relevance Cloud
Feature Set Not Supported
N/A
AB Tasty ranks higher in 8/8 features
AB Tasty ranks higher in 8/8 features
Heatmap tool

7.0
70%
6 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Click analytics

8.1
81%
13 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Scroll maps

8.2
82%
6 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Conversion tracking

7.9
79%
16 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Goal tracking

7.9
79%
16 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Test reporting

8.2
82%
17 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Results segmentation

7.2
72%
15 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Experiments results dashboard

7.7
77%
4 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Attribute Ratings
- AB Tasty is rated higher in 1 area: Likelihood to Renew
- Coveo Relevance Cloud is rated higher in 1 area: Likelihood to Recommend
Likelihood to Recommend

8.6
AB Tasty
86%
48 Ratings
10.0
Coveo Relevance Cloud
100%
4 Ratings
Likelihood to Renew

7.7
AB Tasty
77%
8 Ratings
6.6
Coveo Relevance Cloud
66%
2 Ratings
Support Rating

7.3
AB Tasty
73%
3 Ratings
Coveo Relevance Cloud
N/A
0 Ratings
Likelihood to Recommend
AB Tasty
A/B Tasty tool allows us do easy testing without burdening our limited developer resources all the time. Reports are simple enough to interpret. Support has been excellent and proactive, also the onboarding was successful. It is also an advantage that we have the possibility to drive all our traffic to the test versions rather than being limited to specific user amount per month. We can recommend A/B Tasty for testing purposes, as the platform keeps it’s promises, doesn’t require too much technical knowledge and the support is excellent.
UX Designer
SCM Suomi OyInternet, 51-200 employees
Coveo Relevance Cloud
Coveo Relevance Cloud is a great solution to implement into Salesforce to provide Knowledge-Centered Support, Enhancements to a Customer Community, to provide sales aids, or to complement your customized app in Salesforce.
CEO (Chief Executive Officer)
MC+AInformation Technology & Services, 11-50 employees
Pros
AB Tasty
- Customer-focused. Over the past year, AB Tasty has worked with us to overcome many obstacles (e.g. tracking hurdles, ITP issues, etc.). The team always finds a solution in a timely manner to ensure we're able to execute on experiments.
- Reliability. One of the biggest hurdles earlier this year were the ITP regulations set out by Apple. Over 40% of our ad traffic was Safari users. AB Tasty was using 3rd party cookies but quickly migrated over to a local session storage solution that circumvented the issue.
CRO Specialist
Evolve Vacation RentalHospitality, 201-500 employees
Coveo Relevance Cloud
- Coveo is fast, search results come up quick (though it's not always great).
- Not much complexity to run.
- Coveo is implemented within our portal and doesn't require extra steps to use it.

Verified User
Team Lead in Professional Services
Civil Engineering Company, 10,001+ employeesCons
AB Tasty
- Sometimes the platform is a little glitchy and requires a refresh.
- Would be great to be able to see the experiments and projects on a timeline with their status and main result to have an immediate view of ongoing and completed projects.
- Email notification for when an experiment reaches a certain confidence level.

Verified User
Manager in Other
Luxury Goods & Jewelry Company, 51-200 employeesCoveo Relevance Cloud
- It would be great if Coveo 6 allowed you to rebuild indexes from a certain subtree instead of needing to rebuild the entire tree to see changes. This functionality was added in Coveo 7 and is very useful.
- In Coveo 6, integration with Sitecore is more difficult than one would expect. This integration is much improved in Coveo 7.
- I have seen cases where an exception thrown when crawling a specific document will cause the indexing to stop completely. I believe this only happens in implementations using custom faceting but it could be handled more efficiently if the trouble document was skipped and the indexing could continue.
- Relevancy ranking editor is good but not as powerful as GSA. GSA offers a self-learning scorer which automatically analyzes user behavior and the specific links that users click on for specific queries to fine tune relevance and scoring.
- We've ran into issues on multiple clients with Sitecore items being indexed multiple times in Sitecore 7 and Coveo 7. The fix Coveo suggested was to upgrade our Sitecore version and Coveo but unfortunately this didn't resolve our issue. After months of testing we were finally able to resolve this by implementing our own CoveoItemCrawler to get around the issue (based on https://developers.coveo.com/display/public/SC201404/Items+in+the+Same+Language+
Gets+Indexed+Multiple+Times;jsessionid=3C1A2AE33540E0A0B8BB52BA3A64AF70). - Integration with RabbitMQ in Coveo 7 seems error prone. We often see the error "The AMQP operation was interrupted" and on occasion, need to restart the Coveo service to get this operating again. In some extreme cases, we have also had to restart the server because of issues when attempting to restart the Coveo service.
Web Developer
VelirInformation Technology and Services, 51-200 employees
Pricing Details
AB Tasty
General
Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
—Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Entry-level set up fee?
No
Starting Price
$40 per month
AB Tasty Editions & Modules
—
Additional Pricing Details
—Coveo Relevance Cloud
General
Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
—Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Entry-level set up fee?
Optional
Starting Price
$600 per month
Coveo Relevance Cloud Editions & Modules
Edition
Base | $6001 |
---|---|
Pro | $1,3201 |
- per month
Additional Pricing Details
—Likelihood to Renew
AB Tasty
AB Tasty 7.7
Based on 8 answers
AB Tasty's tool as well as the support team completely met my goals on A/B Testing. Editing a test is really easy and AB Tasty made the marketing team free to launch nearly any test. Reporting is also easy to set up and give us the information needed to keep improving transformation on landing pages and forms

Verified User
Project Manager in Marketing
Internet Company, 11-50 employeesCoveo Relevance Cloud
Coveo Relevance Cloud 6.6
Based on 2 answers
This question is not applicable to me
Project Manager
Slalom ConsultingInformation Technology and Services, 10,001+ employees
Support Rating
AB Tasty
AB Tasty 7.3
Based on 3 answers
Support is good, but it would be better if it was quicker or if AB Tasty provided a quicker SLA. At times, you require stuff urgently but AB Tasty support isn't as quick as I personally like it to be.
Digital Optimisation Specialist
Pets at HomeRetail, 10,001+ employees
Coveo Relevance Cloud
No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
AB Tasty
We selected AB Tasty mostly because we got a sense that their dev and customer service teams were going to go above and beyond to help us out. We were right! The cost was also a factor as they came in a small bit lower, but cost wasn't the only factor.
Senior Director of Web & E-Commerce
AvidComputer Software, 1001-5000 employees
Coveo Relevance Cloud
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
AB Tasty
- Since we use AB tasty our conversion rates have significantly increased on the Watch pages.
- We can report positive comments about the evolutions of our interfaces, from our expert users. And so improved customer satisfaction.
- The solution allows us to validate or invalidate without taking major risk while gaining in reactivity, our proposals relook pages.
- Commitment rates are much higher, multiplied by 2 or 3, when we implement customizations that are relevant. These customizations are very relevant insofar as we are governed by the seasonality of events as a media site.
Chef de Produit Web Junior
EurosportMedia Production, 501-1000 employees
Coveo Relevance Cloud
- Quick to find things in a massive database when needed.
- Results need to be more concise - sometimes we spend more time looking for the right file than if we were to just search amongst our own networks instead.
- Coveo is not always the most useful but does its job when general information is needed.

Verified User
Team Lead in Professional Services
Civil Engineering Company, 10,001+ employees