Freehand, from InVision headquartered in New York, is an online whiteboard that enables teams to plan, brainstorm, and draw together. It aims to give everyone a simple way to visually represent ideas with charts, diagrams, and drawings. Whether for mind mapping, creating a customer journey map, or drafting up an org chart, Freehand can help teams make ideas and plans visual.
$4
per month per user
Mural
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
MURAL (formerly Mural.ly) from Tactivos (DBA MURAL) in San Francisco is described by the vendor as a digital workspace and visual collaboration tool, designed for creative teams to make the process of design more efficient for distributed teams, working remotely.
$12
per month
Pricing
Freehand by InVision
Mural
Editions & Modules
Freehand Free
$0
per year per user
Freehand Pro
$4
per month per user
Freehand Enterprise
Custom Quote
Starter
$12
per month
Plus
$20
per month
Enterprise
Contact sales team
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Freehand by InVision
Mural
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Plans are billed annually.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Freehand by InVision
Mural
Considered Both Products
Freehand by InVision
Verified User
Director
Chose Freehand by InVision
These products are very similar. MURAL seems to have more fun characters.
I find InVision Freehand to be a bit more user-friendly than MURAL. I find that it does not glitch quite as much and that this enables more ease in collaboration. I also appreciate the various functions that is included in the free version of InVision. It's perfect for …
InVision Freehand is lacking in features compared to competitors like MURAL and Miro, but its streamlined, easy-to-use interface makes it easy to pick up and throw something together in an instant. It does not do large complex work as well as its competitors, but InVision …
We were using inVision Freehand at the time based on a team member's suggestion. They were familiar with it, having used it at their prior organization, so we naturally adopted it after they introduced it to the organization. However, the team quickly moved on to other …
MURAL is very similar in the type of approach we could use to walk through certain items but it lacks many features that we rely on in InVision, so we typically stay away from MURAL.
Verified User
Consultant
Chose Freehand by InVision
I have found that between freehand InVision Freehand, Miro, MURAL and FigJam, each product does certain things differently. Some of those products execute certain features better than others. One benefit to InVision freehand is that it's sometimes nice to have all of your messy …
The two other platforms that people have tried to get us to use are Figma and Miro. Since we have been using InVision Freehand it works much better for our teams and is within the InVision environment that we are familiar with. The InVision Freehand tools and user interface are …
For real-time collaboration and whiteboarding Comparable to Mural and Miro Better and more flexible than Figma For written documentation: Different features and more limited than Google Doc Similar to Notion in editing experience but more limited in features For creating …
InVision Freehand is simple to use and doesn't have all the bells and whistles Figma offers - and its simplicity has a place in the workspace tech stack. We haven't tried Figma Jam yet - even though we use Figma, we still prefer Invision.
All products are getting pretty good, but InVision stands out as the most frictionless one to use. A lot of the power is cleverly designed so that it doesn't get in the way of how differently people naturally think and operate. For example, even the presence of a grid on some …
I really do like Miro and its features a lot but the fact that it doesn't integrate or live with the rest of our UX deliverables makes it challenging to use.
I selected Invision Freehand for my purpose because it is easier to create and doesn't require a lot of technical knowledge to use. For example with FigmaJam, I feel like it's easier for designers to use because they use Figma for creating designs. With Mural I like to use …
I honestly think all the tools mentioned above are pretty well designed and executed compared to freehand. As far as the features of freehand compared to other tools, I do not see anything unique or extra that one software does that the other software does not. So with that …
Freehand is more a tool for design/ideation, whereas Mural is more a tool for workshop collaboration. Freehand benefits from its integration with other InVision tools and Sketch.
InVision FreeHand is pretty similar to other tools like Miro, FigJam, and Mural. It is more a question of preference on how the tool looks and works because it is very similar in terms of features and what you can do. I guess if you used InVision Freehand before and like …