GitLab DevSecOps platform enables software innovation by aiming to empower development, security, and operations teams to build better software, faster. With GitLab, teams can create, deliver, and manage code quickly and continuously instead of managing disparate tools and scripts. GitLab helps teams across the complete DevSecOps lifecycle, from developing, securing, and deploying software. Differentiators, as described by Gitlab:
Simplicity: With GitLab, DevSecOps can…
$0
per month per user
Jira Software
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Jira Software is a project management tool from Atlassian, featuring an interactive timeline for mapping work items, dependencies, and releases, Scrum boards for agile teams, and out-of-the-box reports and dashboards.
Gitlab surpasses Bitbucket in all areas except of course the very tight integration Bitbucket has with JIRA and Confluence. Almost everyone uses JIRA at some level or time so Bitbucket has a more natural and tight integration feel. However, there is good JIRA integration with …
I never used GitHub for work, but to keep my blog and personal code safe and accessible wherever I go. Jira is a swiss army knife. With its plug-in, you can do more things than Gitlab. On Jira, you can block, for example, a user to move tickets to UAT to code review. On Jira, …
It was a management decision to use GitLab over other tools. It integrates well with RBAC using Terraform. Runners are easy to setup. Almost all the features the organization used before are available in GitLab.
Gitlab provided on par functionality and it provided a good option for us to self host which is very important for our business. We think the business continuity story is more solid with Gitlab.
GitLab is easily the preferred tool when it comes to versioning and source control. With other tools the UI often feels outdated and clunky leading to inefficiency and confusion. With some of the sleeker tools such as GitKraken, while the aesthetic is pleasing, the experience …
We are coming from Bitbucket, and we switch to Gitlab to improve the source code management and the reading, which is better on Gitlab. The Merge request flow is also better than Bitbucket. This allows us to use Gitlab CI, which is well-integrated. Compared to GitHub, it is …
The best thing about GitLab is the pricing and the smooth and fast onboarding. The base plan itself covers most use cases in Gitlab and that too is completely free, this gives the small companies or the startups the push they require at the beginning. Other than that Gitlab has …
Gitlab made our product life cycle efficient. It has a better user interface and user experience. GitLab doesn't clutter with many features upfront and provides a lot of free services, which is missing in any other product. For small teams, it's the best piece of software. I …
The main reason for selecting GitLab over the others is that the free version also we have most of the functionalities available. We can create private repositories, assign different permissions to different users, can create a good number of users, so almost everything you …
As a front-end to revision control workflows, all three products are similar. Bitbucket suffers from the usual problems with Atlassian: it's slow and bloated. GitHub is a viable alternative for these workflows; the choice is entirely dependent on organizational constraints. For …
Sometimes it gets very slow and provides a problem to connect or update the servers. Search is difficult on some pages. Some features are missing that are available on GitHub.
GitLab offers us the CE as an on-premise option without additional cost. We can deploy easily GitLab CE using docker official images. The GitLab CI option is more mature and simple than GitHub Actions.
GitLab is the best combination of all the other tools. They are still viable in their own sense, but for the projects we were using, GitLab proved to be an excellent alternative.
In terms of issue tracking and wiki documentation, Gitlab isn't as fully featured as them and has a more developer-centric workflow and GUI. This makes it more difficult for other organisation members to learn and adopt the software fully. However, Gitlab was still chosen …
GitLab stands up great to other Git hosting services. GitLab CI blows GitLab past it's competitors to take a Git server and make it a complete application management platform. Versus GitHub, GitLab does not stand up for hosting open source projects as GitHub has a much larger …
Bugzilla would be useful if you don't want to pay for bug tracking but maintenance is a bit painful. We are using Gitlab as our repo, The way Gitlab is progressing, I think We can replace Jira with that.
Lead Consultant - Solutions Architect - Software Engineer
Chose Jira Software
Jira Software works for many development environments, has custom workflows, is friendly, stable, robust, and can be integrated with the most recognized DevOps tools on the market.
Jira is easy to use for less technical work professionals, while Azure and GitHub [take] more time to learn how to use effectively. For large firms with multiple business and technology teams collaborating, Jira Software is a great tool for first time Agile users and …