Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Looker
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Looker is a BI application with an analytics-oriented application server that sits on top of relational data stores. It includes an end-user interface for exploring data, a reusable development paradigm for data discovery, and an API for supporting data in other systems.N/A
Piano Analytics
Score 8.1 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Piano Analytics, formerly AT Internet, provides digital analytics to help customers measure their audience, optimise their digital performance and create value. From data collection to exploration, activation, and the sharing of actionable insights, the Piano Analytics Suite is designed to provide reliable high-quality data to enhance decision-making company-wide. Adapted to e-commerce, media, finance/banking, and corporate websites & mobile apps, the vendor promises an easy-to-use solution…
$430
per server calls consumption
Pricing
LookerPiano Analytics
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Business
$430
per server calls consumption
Premium
Contact us
per server calls consumption
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
LookerPiano Analytics
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeRequired$430 per server calls consumption
Additional DetailsMust contact sales team for pricing.
More Pricing Information
Features
LookerPiano Analytics
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Looker
8.1
95 Ratings
1% below category average
Piano Analytics
-
Ratings
Pixel Perfect reports7.679 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable dashboards8.894 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates7.980 Ratings00 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Looker
8.1
95 Ratings
0% above category average
Piano Analytics
-
Ratings
Drill-down analysis8.292 Ratings00 Ratings
Formatting capabilities7.493 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages8.038 Ratings00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration8.695 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Looker
8.6
91 Ratings
3% above category average
Piano Analytics
-
Ratings
Publish to Web8.575 Ratings00 Ratings
Publish to PDF8.781 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Versioning8.261 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling8.981 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Looker
6.8
92 Ratings
17% below category average
Piano Analytics
-
Ratings
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)8.190 Ratings00 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization7.579 Ratings00 Ratings
Predictive Analytics4.66 Ratings00 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Looker
8.5
91 Ratings
0% below category average
Piano Analytics
-
Ratings
Multi-User Support (named login)8.986 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model8.379 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)8.686 Ratings00 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control8.427 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Looker
5.8
67 Ratings
31% below category average
Piano Analytics
-
Ratings
Responsive Design for Web Access6.764 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Application5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile6.559 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
LookerPiano Analytics
Small Businesses
BrightGauge
BrightGauge
Score 8.9 out of 10
StatCounter
StatCounter
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Reveal
Reveal
Score 9.9 out of 10
Siteimprove
Siteimprove
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Jaspersoft Community Edition
Jaspersoft Community Edition
Score 9.7 out of 10
Quantum Metric
Quantum Metric
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
LookerPiano Analytics
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(96 ratings)
8.0
(120 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(4 ratings)
8.0
(18 ratings)
Usability
8.8
(12 ratings)
8.3
(8 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.5
(8 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
8.8
(14 ratings)
8.9
(98 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
LookerPiano Analytics
Likelihood to Recommend
Google
Quick dashboards from Google Sheets - Easier to do the graphs than in Google Sheets - Operational dashboards to be used in the day-to-day work - It is good both for retrospective data and to do a pulse check of the current status - Better for not giant amounts of data and not multiple data sources. - If you need a lot of graphs to be displayed on the same page, it can be a bit glitchy during configuration (then the use works fine).
Read full review
Piano Software
When it comes to web analytics AT Internet is well suited. We introduced AT Internet in 2017 after an evaluation project with other professional analytics solutions. Starting with our corporate website we quickly rolled it out to our customer experience platform, our webshops, and our corporate intranet based on SharePoint 2013. Especially the use in our intranet brought significant improvements over the standard analytics features SP 2013 is offering. The ATI tag systems with their flexibility allow us to include company-specific properties and thus making it possible for us to analyze our intranet usage on segments such as locations, branches, and so on.
Read full review
Pros
Google
  • Filtering - you can filter across different dimensions and metrics to get a more specific "cut" of data
  • Refreshing - data automatically ingests into Looker which allows reports to be updated and backfilled in real time
  • Conditional Reporting - you can leverage Looker's reporting features to flag when a given metric or KPI falls below or above a specified threshold. For example, if you had a daily sales benchmark in a SAAS organization, you could use Looker to flag whenever daily sales falls above or below the benchmark
Read full review
Piano Software
  • A very strong, supportive team who are keen to develop the relationship and deliver business value
  • Excellent 'real-time' data availability through rapid data processing
  • Powerful tools for analysing content consumption and usage patterns
  • A range of API options to deliver data in the format required
  • A process of continuous evolution in the data tools provided
Read full review
Cons
Google
  • Looker is less graphical or pictorial which makes it less attractive
  • Consumes a lot of memory when there are multiple rows and columns, impacts performance too
  • At times when we download huge chunks of raw data from Looker dashbords, the time taken to prepare the file is enormous - The user fails to understand if Looker has frozen or if the data is getting prepared in the background for downloading. In turn, user ends up triggering multiple downloads
Read full review
Piano Software
  • Integrations with outside vendors: there are many ways to integrate data from outside vendors, however you can't display this information in every application unless you create a custom field, which can sometimes be limiting.
  • Access rights: there are two places to assign access rights and each place has slightly different functionality. You can get really granular with what each person has access to, but it is easy to miss a check box and have to go back and correct it.
  • Visualizations across applications: there are some really cool visualizations in the oldest application they support that includes predictive traffic estimates, automatic multi-period variations, etc., that aren't available yet in the newer applications.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Google
We've been very happy with Looker so far, and all teams in the organization are starting to see its value, and use it on a frequent basis. It has quickly become our accessible "source of truth" for all data/metrics.
Read full review
Piano Software
I gave this rating because I think that AT Internet is a good tool, user-friendly easy for onboarding and simple dashboards, however the majority of people use Google Analytics, especially media agency, it is easier for them to use Google Analytics.
Read full review
Usability
Google
Looker is relatively easy to use, even as it is set up. The customers for the front-end only have issues with the initial setup for looker ml creations. Other "looks" are relatively easy to set up, depending on the ETL and the data which is coming into Looker on a regular basis.
Read full review
Piano Software
Overall the experience is very good, it's quick, relaiable and does everything I would want. The only problems I have are matching the correct stats to what I want. It can be painful trying to find the right thing and the explanations are not always the clearest. That's the only issue i've found though.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Google
No answers on this topic
Piano Software
I don't have any exemple in mind where AT Internet interface hasn't been available, i have always been able to use AT Internet when i needed it. The only issues to notice is that it happens sometimes that real time or D-1 datas are partially delayed.
Read full review
Performance
Google
No answers on this topic
Piano Software
All excel reports are downloaded very quickly, even if the query is more than 20 000 lines.
Read full review
Support Rating
Google
Never had to work with support for issues. Any questions we had, they would respond promptly and clearly. The one-time setup was easy, by reading documentation. If the feature is not supported, they will add a feature request. In this case, LDAP support was requested over OKTA. They are looking into it.
Read full review
Piano Software
I have not used the Support Team thereby I am unable to review how their Support Teams works. However, in an instance where I had an issue, my concerned department contacted their support team and I was provided with the solution of the problem I was facing within a short span of time.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Google
No answers on this topic
Piano Software
The in-person training unfortunately does not match to our expectations, was too much focus on digital basis and not on AT Internet functionnalties and how to use it. We paid for one day and only 15 minutes at the end was focused on our real needs in terms of media analytics.
Read full review
Online Training
Google
No answers on this topic
Piano Software
No online training
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Google
No answers on this topic
Piano Software
The support team helps us to implement AT Internet.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Google
Looker is an off-the-shelf, free tool for Google business users. Other than the internal cost of time to build, we had no costs to set up what we needed to do. Knowledge sharing internally and using templates greatly reduced this cost, making the overall cost very low.
Read full review
Piano Software
AT Internet shows a deep understanding of our business objectives and provide us with ideas on how to solve them. They grant us enough time to try their tools and to be sure the tools are helpful. The data we've got in the Analyzer was manually checked and it was completely correct. Their roadmap was clean and aligned with our strategy
Read full review
Scalability
Google
No answers on this topic
Piano Software
Regarding AT Internet possibilities, it could be adapted to small or large organizations, easy to set up. We can add sites in makets that we launch e-commerce.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Google
  • Allowing others to self-serve their own analytics and connect it to Looker simply and easily has helped unblock the central data team so they can instead focus on validated dashboards whilst stakeholders manage their day-to-day analysis themselves. Countless engineering hours have been freed up by not having to manage every user permission for each BI tool; we have a BYOBI approach; Bring Your Own BI
  • Creation and management of a semantic layer (LookML =Looker Modeling Language ) allows peoples sandboxes and production databases to become clutter free. Minor adjustments, conditional fields, and even some modelling can all be done in LookML which doesn't need oversight or governance from the central data team.
  • LookML, specifying drilldown fields and their sub-queries, as well as generally creating dynamic parameters with Liquid are all great features, but can have a steep learning curve. it may take some time to understand how to create this middle layer correctly, or even pose a risk of inheriting complex code from another source which can be unmaintainable if it becomes too big. Some level of governance is recommended if Looker is used by a large number of editors.
Read full review
Piano Software
  • Unfortunately, I do not have precise results to give, but the statistics provided by AT Internet make it possible to carry out in-depth analyses and to make good decisions.
  • You just have to know how to find the information and interpret it.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Looker Screenshots

Screenshot of a Looker dashboard with a geo chart.

Piano Analytics Screenshots

Screenshot of Analytics Suite Delta - ExplorerScreenshot of Analytics Suite Delta - Traffic SourcesScreenshot of Analytics Suite Delta - AttributionScreenshot of Analytics Suite Delta - AXON PredictionsScreenshot of Analytics Suite Delta - NavigationScreenshot of Analytics Suite Delta - Navigation