Net-Results is a marketing automation solution that features segment-driven approaches to lead management and marketing automation. Some key features include support for A/B email testing, drag & drop landing pages, CRM integrations, and automated marketing workflows.
$800
Annual agreement, up to 25,000 Contacts or 60,000 Sends
Ortto
Score 8.9 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Ortto is presented as a product-led growth engine that helps businesses acquire and retain customers. Since 2015, Ortto has supported over 10,000 companies with their software. Ortto allows online businesses to unify their customer data with their CDP, segment key audiences across the customer lifecycle; activate these audiences with personalized, omnichannel experiences, and analyze their business for growth with a suite of BI tools. The vendor states teams at Microsoft, Bltly, Typeform,…
$599
per month month-to-month commitment with 10,000 contacts
Pricing
Net-Results
Ortto
Editions & Modules
One Price Full Platform
$800
Annual agreement, up to 25,000 Contacts or 60,000 Sends
Professional
$599
per month month-to-month commitment with 10,000 contacts
Business
$999
per month annual commitment, paid monthly with 10,000 contacts
Enterprise
$1,999
per month annual commitment, paid monthly with 10,000 contacts
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Net-Results
Ortto
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Tiered pricing by total email sends or total contacts, you decide. All features included. No upsells or limitations based on your price.
10% discount for quarterly pricing. 15% discount for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Net-Results
Ortto
Features
Net-Results
Ortto
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Net-Results
7.1
23 Ratings
7% below category average
Ortto
9.0
11 Ratings
17% above category average
WYSIWYG email editor
7.021 Ratings
8.911 Ratings
Dynamic content
7.214 Ratings
8.98 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content
7.311 Ratings
8.98 Ratings
Landing pages
7.019 Ratings
00 Ratings
A/B testing
6.311 Ratings
8.98 Ratings
Mobile optimization
5.022 Ratings
8.910 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting
8.023 Ratings
9.911 Ratings
List management
7.022 Ratings
8.911 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences
8.618 Ratings
8.911 Ratings
Lead Management
Comparison of Lead Management features of Product A and Product B
Net-Results
7.6
20 Ratings
2% below category average
Ortto
9.2
11 Ratings
17% above category average
Lead nurturing automation
8.518 Ratings
9.911 Ratings
Lead scoring and grading
8.418 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data quality management
5.018 Ratings
8.910 Ratings
Automated sales alerts and tasks
8.616 Ratings
8.99 Ratings
Campaign Management
Comparison of Campaign Management features of Product A and Product B
Net-Results
7.5
15 Ratings
0% above category average
Ortto
8.9
9 Ratings
17% above category average
Calendaring
7.99 Ratings
00 Ratings
Event/webinar marketing
7.015 Ratings
8.99 Ratings
Social Media Marketing
Comparison of Social Media Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Net-Results
6.9
7 Ratings
8% below category average
Ortto
8.9
8 Ratings
18% above category average
Social sharing and campaigns
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Social profile integration
6.77 Ratings
8.98 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Net-Results
6.3
22 Ratings
15% below category average
Ortto
8.9
12 Ratings
20% above category average
Dashboards
7.021 Ratings
8.912 Ratings
Standard reports
6.022 Ratings
8.912 Ratings
Custom reports
6.019 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Net-Results is very well-suited for small, medium and large businesses. They seem to be more advanced than what a typical enterprise level implementation would require. When selecting a marketing automation provider make it a point to find out the level of integration with Salesforce and other marketing technologies. Do they have pre-built automation modules or does it require building from the ground up? Also ask questions regarding its specific capabilities ... for example: is it a marketing automation provider? is it a CRM provider? etc
Autopilot has a friendly and bright appeal offering a code-free automation experience that makes it easy to build complex automated workflows. Anyone can start creating workflows using the drag-and-drop builder even without technical knowledge. Teams utilize the notes and graphics feature to collaborate on automation workflows providing a much easier way to understand workflows created by someone else.
Very easy to use automation builder with many great options and integrations. Lets us tailor incredibly precise campaigns through use of Autopilot's own features, plus its tight integrations with data from sources like Segment.
Easy and powerful email editing and creation built-in. No need for email template coding.
Autopilot allows marketers to have full control and implement new web forms to capture leads quickly with its automatic form detection. No need to save custom form data to our own backend saves our development team time.
Limited Design Customization: If you're an experienced marketer and are used to the unlimited customization capabilities of larger platforms (or coding your own templates), you might find Autopilot's options to be limiting. It's great for a beginner user who shouldn't be encumbered with those options, but I could see if being frustrating for others.
Net Results is pretty easy to use and understand. I wouldn't say that it is the best in comparison to MailChimp's drag and drop email builder, but Net Results do so much more than MailChimp that it is hard to even compare the two. Overall Net Results has good usability
We've used ClickDimensions and Marketo. We felt that ClickDimensions was more limited as far as creating effective email campaigns and not as easy to use. It also is completely native to Dynamics CRM, which can be a positive and a negative. Marketo was the previous solution we owned, we are much happier with Net-Results. It's easier to use, not as complex and there is much better communication from their support team. When looking at a new solution we also looked at Act-On and Hubspot. Act-On probably would've been our second choice, but it didn't have as modern of a feel and wasn't quite as easy to use. Hubspot didn't really fit our business. It was very focused on SEO and blog posts. It didn't have the features we needed from a marketing standpoint
How would I say this, for me Autopilot is a whole other tool then the other MA tools I use. Most other MA tools focus on a lot of options and things you can do with it. But Autopilot seems to mainly focus on the visual builder to make automations, and they do that really well! The other tools are also great but more a "complete package solution" with a lot of options. And that can be overwhelming. So if you want a great easy-to-use workflow/automation builder and less of all the other options Autopilot is a great start.
Stronger re-engagement rates - The buy cycle for our product can be very long. Net-Results helps us keep in touch with prospects that may have gone cold.
Better asset utilization - Net-Results helps us drive continuous utilization of our assets.
Efficiency - The automation Net-Results has provided means we can focus on other tasks, like creating new assets or building new partnerships.
Not sure. I cannot put a $ on it for ROI as I was the administrator and not part of the team that procured it. Time-wise I would say I spent less time using it than I previously had used in CloudPortal Services Manager.