1. Home
  2. Visual Collaboration Software
  3. Miro Reviews
  4. User Review of Miro
Miro experience
February 28, 2024

Miro experience

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Miro

Used for design purposes and team collaboration. We design seasonal concept boards and use the full potential of Miro's collaboration faculties to create presentation boards. Then we will build out the line sheet including a sketch for each of our products in the line with information like fabric codes, product codes, and general note-taking.
  • Collaboration
  • Load time
  • Easy to come back to
  • Quicker load time
  • Can be slow in large files
  • Can sometimes freeze and not show tool bar
  • Improved productivity
  • Reduced project completion time
  • return on initial costs
Implementing Miro effectively requires clear guidelines on its use and integration with existing workflows. Training teams on its features enhances collaboration. Establishing templates for common tasks can streamline processes. However, managing access and ensuring data security are crucial. It’s important to balance flexibility with structure to maximize Miro's benefits for collaborative projects.
I'd rate Miro an 8 for ease of integration. Its API and numerous out-of-the-box integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams facilitate smooth incorporation into existing workflows. However, the complexity of custom integrations can vary, requiring some technical expertise, thus not achieving a full score. Thank you
Miro has transformed our organization by fostering seamless collaboration among remote teams and various locations. Its interactive online whiteboard has enabled synchronous brainstorming sessions, effective project planning, and real-time feedback, significantly enhancing productivity and creativity. Miro's visual tools have bridged communication gaps, making new project collaboration more dynamic and inclusive.
Miro and Bluescape are both robust collaboration tools, but Miro was selected for its intuitive interface and ease of use, making it accessible for all team members regardless of their technical skills. While Bluescape offers extensive features for creative projects, Miro's flexibility, user-friendly design, and broad integration capabilities better matched our needs for diverse project collaboration.

Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Miro's feature set?

Yes

Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of Miro go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Miro again?

Yes

Miro excels in scenarios requiring collaborative brainstorming, project planning, and remote team workshops, offering real-time visual collaboration and idea mapping. It's less appropriate for highly detailed, text-heavy document creation or individual tasks that don't benefit from visual planning or collaborative input, where traditional word processors or project management tools might be more efficient.