What users are saying about
9 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener noreferrer'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 4.3 out of 100
23 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener noreferrer'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 9.3 out of 100

Likelihood to Recommend

AccuRev

Very slow and not intuitive; it would be my last choice for version control systems.The UI is a little confusing at times and seems a little outdated. It needs a lot of improvement. It is suited for small projects and fewer number of projects. But if there are huge projects and many projects to be maintained in a portfolio, its a little hard to manage.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Bitbucket Server (formerly Stash)

Bitbucket Server would be good to use if you are not extremely reliant on the availability of your code at any given moment. If you have other systems relying on the up status of Bitbucket Server that can cause problems if unable to reach it -- you might consider going with a different product
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Pros

AccuRev

  • One place for most recent code with history, avoid any conflict/confusion among other team/members.
  • Stream/Workflow approach to control approval process betwen all the teams, which I couldn't find in other version control tools I worked.
  • Bundle our code in a small group (called, Issues in Accurev) to differentiate between different projects.
Nishant Bilaiya | TrustRadius Reviewer

Bitbucket Server (formerly Stash)

  • Projects & Permissions - Stash keeps you and your developers productive by providing a way to structure your repositories and manage permissions via a simple, yet powerful user interface. Stash is very easy to use, manage & administer.
  • Essentially Stash gives two versions of interfaces to work with.
  • Stash Repository hosted on a server.
  • Atlassian SourceTree.
  • Atlassian Sourcetree is a tool to work with a code in stash. The two 'web' and 'desktop' versions make working with code user friendly, intuitive and comprehensive.
  • Connectivity to JIRA - Stash keeps track of all issues associated with commits. Users can use Stash to quickly see all issues associated with a commit, or use the Source tab on JIRA issues for an aggregate view of all the code changes that are related to a specific JIRA issue. With this information available, your development team saves time when tracking particular bug fixes or improvements.
Advait Deshpande | TrustRadius Reviewer

Cons

AccuRev

  • Ability to zoom in/out for stream-view. We currently have many streams/substreams and unable to view the entire workflow. Zooming in/out would benefit.
  • Being a designer, I use Adobe Flash and SWF files. When updating the SWF files, Accurev does not see these files as being changed and you will be unable to promote. In order to push changes, you must totally rename the SWF file.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Bitbucket Server (formerly Stash)

  • It's difficult to create flexible pull requests that might need to be approved by 4 people and others by only 1 person. All pull requests require the same number of approvers
  • Maneuvering through the git-components of Stash to look at particular branches, diff branches, or view tags can be difficult, tedious, or impossible. Direct support for some more advanced git actions would be appreciated.
  • There is no readme concept (like in github) for a repository.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Likelihood to Renew

AccuRev

AccuRev 6.1
Based on 3 answers
We will renew because it is part of our build process.
Jason Vroustouris | TrustRadius Reviewer

Bitbucket Server (formerly Stash)

Bitbucket Server (formerly Stash) 10.0
Based on 1 answer
Because we're so locked in, it's likely we'll be using Bitbucket Server for a while, unfortunately.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Usability

AccuRev

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Bitbucket Server (formerly Stash)

Bitbucket Server (formerly Stash) 8.5
Based on 2 answers
The usability of its interface is pretty straight forward when it comes to creating projects and repositories, but when you have to dive into finer grained portions of the UI things can get tricky. If you are used to using tools like GitHub or Gitlab -- Bitbucket is just different enough to be a bother.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Support Rating

AccuRev

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Bitbucket Server (formerly Stash)

Bitbucket Server (formerly Stash) 8.6
Based on 7 answers
Never really needed any support as the application is very easy to set up and maintain. Any questions we had were well documented in their online documentation, and community forum.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Alternatives Considered

AccuRev

In my view, accurev ranks very low compared to other tools I have used. Microsoft TFS is the best in the industry as of today as it's a complete ALM solution. It does code version, bug tracking, user story documentation, and has easy integration with other external tools supporting many languages. So I would definitely recommend TFS to anyone.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Bitbucket Server (formerly Stash)

In terms of a DVCS solution, both Bitbucket Server and GitHub offer a very similar set of features. The real strength of Bitbucket comes from its integrations with other Atlassian applications that we are also using. Being able to reference and tie together code commits, development issues, and build tasks is invaluable for us. You can also integrate these tools with GitHub, but it will always feel like a 2nd wheel.Bitbucket Server, as the name suggests, is a server variant of the solution, so you can deploy it in your own infrastructure instead of in the cloud. The GitHub equivalent, GitHub Enterprise, was too cost-prohibitive.
Patrick Li | TrustRadius Reviewer

Return on Investment

AccuRev

  • Better team coordination.
  • Avoid confusion by having one place for all documentation and code.
  • Better project management by having different work streams.
Nishant Bilaiya | TrustRadius Reviewer

Bitbucket Server (formerly Stash)

  • In positive form, having Stash over not having it at all has provided us with a superior repository system over trying to push to some local server instance and manage branches/merging from our local machines.
  • There are no real negatives to using Stash, its only problem is that there are competitors out there that can offer additional features.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Pricing Details

AccuRev

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
Optional

Bitbucket Server (formerly Stash)

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Add comparison