What users are saying about
Top Rated
150 Ratings
12 Ratings
Top Rated
150 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 7.9 out of 101
12 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.1 out of 101

Add comparison

Likelihood to Recommend

Adobe Experience Manager

If you have a number of smaller parts of your organization that you want to maintain the same look & feel as the rest of the organization, it is easy to create a base site and then let them customize. Also, if you have contributors of content who are not involved in the web site maintenance - our professors, for example - they can enter the text on a basic page which is then incorporated through tagging
Diana Williams profile photo

Clickability

Clickability is not suited when when users log in into a website and lot of the website functionality is tied to user login. It is well suited for read only content sites. At what frequency is the content on the site updated? How much control is needed by the business user to edit the site? If a business needs more control, I prefer Clickability.
Sriharsha Chekuri profile photo

Feature Rating Comparison

Security

Adobe Experience Manager
8.2
Clickability
9.0
Role-based user permissions
Adobe Experience Manager
8.2
Clickability
9.0

Platform & Infrastructure

Adobe Experience Manager
7.6
Clickability
8.0
API
Adobe Experience Manager
7.5
Clickability
8.0
Internationalization / multi-language
Adobe Experience Manager
7.7
Clickability
8.0

Web Content Creation

Adobe Experience Manager
7.0
Clickability
7.7
WYSIWYG editor
Adobe Experience Manager
8.2
Clickability
8.0
Code quality / cleanliness
Adobe Experience Manager
7.0
Clickability
9.0
Admin section
Adobe Experience Manager
7.5
Clickability
9.0
Page templates
Adobe Experience Manager
6.9
Clickability
9.9
Library of website themes
Adobe Experience Manager
5.5
Clickability
1.0
Mobile optimization / responsive design
Adobe Experience Manager
7.0
Clickability
9.0
Publishing workflow
Adobe Experience Manager
8.0
Clickability
8.0
Form generator
Adobe Experience Manager
6.3
Clickability

Web Content Management

Adobe Experience Manager
6.1
Clickability
7.4
Content taxonomy
Adobe Experience Manager
6.6
Clickability
9.0
SEO support
Adobe Experience Manager
6.5
Clickability
9.0
Bulk management
Adobe Experience Manager
6.1
Clickability
8.0
Availability / breadth of extensions
Adobe Experience Manager
6.1
Clickability
7.0
Community / comment management
Adobe Experience Manager
5.4
Clickability
4.0

Pros

  • Media library and asset management is simplified, separating storage and also allowing developers to manage the workflow of the publishing process.
  • No addition of API services are required, using the same requests and data access layer for both front end and back end development simplifies the project lifecycle.
  • Duplicating code is easy, developers can simply copy components and reuse or rework for each use case.
Mike Plant profile photo
  • Adding custom content fields while adding a new article or blog page.
  • Managing user and user groups.
  • Developing and saving web design templates.
No photo available

Cons

  • The move to the new interface for authoring is drastically different from the previous interface. Moving has been difficult.
  • Since it is so customizable, a talented web dev team is needed to make all the parts.
  • It is not easy to tell if the page is live or draft in the new interface.
  • Integration with non-Adobe marketing automation tools is very difficult.
No photo available
  • Adding Facebook/Social Media commenting.
  • Sharing articles and blog entries to Social Media sites.
  • Video/media clips/podcasting publishing.
No photo available

Likelihood to Renew

Adobe Experience Manager9.0
Based on 5 answers
I'll continue to use this product for many years. Adobe is making it clear they are taking customer feedback seriously and there continues to be growing demand for Adobe CQ implementations. As a developer, I find that there is still lots of room in this platform to try new techniques and really keep our implementations up to par with the latest standards.
Curtis Mortensen profile photo
Clickability5.5
Based on 6 answers
If I still worked with my last employer, I would likely renew my use of Clickability, because the service also provides periodic software updates, wonderful email and phone support, a user community filled with end-users who are a part of the publishing field and web developers, and values our feedback
No photo available

Usability

Adobe Experience Manager10.0
Based on 2 answers
I personally feel that AEM is very intuitive to use from an authoring standpoint. The entire CMS was engineered around the author. Everything about AEM is geared to helping authors generate and maintain content. There are ways that tool tips can be customized so that any individual could simply hover over and be guided step by step on how to author web content
Vagner Polund profile photo
Clickability7.5
Based on 3 answers
Once you learn the system, it's pretty easy. Training is involved and not ever placement list is drag-and-drop.
No photo available

Support

Adobe Experience Manager9.0
Based on 1 answer
Its so far the best Content Management System, available in market.
No photo available
Clickability7.6
Based on 2 answers
I found that some agents were better then others, usually you have an account representative and that I would consider level 1 support. To get really complex answers you need to talk with an engineer.
No photo available

Implementation

Adobe Experience Manager8.7
Based on 2 answers
Depending on your individual needs, It is really quite simple to create an authoring experience for a website that looks really good. I have been part of many implementations and many teams and have seen many projects that were super successful and others that were not implemented well. AEM has room for a lot of flexibility in the implementation process compared to other CMS like SharePoint
Vagner Polund profile photo
Clickability7.3
Based on 2 answers
Have a developer on staff to work with them, even if you are not designing your site yourself.
No photo available

Alternatives Considered

We have used both Hybris and AEM, Hybris for e-commerce site and AEM for front facing site. Generally we prefer AEM due to the ease of use and user friendliness, as well as improved interface
No photo available
Many of other content management systems similar to WordPress need custom installation. The server costs and upgrades quickly add up. Clickability while expensive, eliminated the overhead of managing all the dependency needs for a CMS. Clickability also works with its clients to understand the business needs and proposes the solutions accordingly. They have a good support team.
Sriharsha Chekuri profile photo

Return on Investment

  • Positive: Can quickly create and launch marketing campaigns.
  • Negative: Can be expensive to develop custom AEM experiences.
No photo available
  • Increase in website traffic, SEO
  • Better utilization of dev resources
  • Quick turn around time
Sriharsha Chekuri profile photo

Pricing Details

Adobe Experience Manager

General
Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No
Additional Pricing Details

Clickability

General
Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No
Additional Pricing Details