eMaint CMMS vs. UpKeep Maintenance Management

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
eMaint CMMS
Score 6.7 out of 10
N/A
eMaint offers computerized maintenance management software with features for inventory management, asset management, maintenance scheduling, etc. eMaint is now owned and supported by Fluke Corp since the September 2016 acquisition.
$69
per month per user
UpKeep Maintenance Management
Score 8.3 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
UpKeep allows users to snap a picture of a broken piece of equipment, create a work order, and schedule it for repair - all from a mobile device. UpKeep is designed for facility, property, restaurant, and manufacturing managers looking to improve communication by enabling real-time status updates for their teams. The vendor says it is a modern, intuitive, and customizable CMMS that is proven to expedite workflow processes. Capabilities include: -Add co-workers and easily assign work…
$40
per technician/per month
Pricing
eMaint CMMSUpKeep Maintenance Management
Editions & Modules
Team
$69
per month per user
Professional
$85
per month per user
Enterprise
$120
per month per user
Starter
$40
per technician/per month
Professional
$75
per technician/per month
Business Plus
$120
per technician/per month
Enterprise
$180
per technician/per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
eMaint CMMSUpKeep Maintenance Management
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
eMaint CMMSUpKeep Maintenance Management
Considered Both Products
eMaint CMMS

No answer on this topic

UpKeep Maintenance Management
Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
Upkeep is a faster cleaner system than a Maintenance Connection with a great mobile option for my technicians. The user interface for reports and PM creation is fast and easy. It has more functionality than eMaint and works very well for all the things we needed a CMMS to do in …
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
eMaint CMMSUpKeep Maintenance Management
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
TOPdesk
TOPdesk
Score 8.7 out of 10
TOPdesk
TOPdesk
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
TOPdesk
TOPdesk
Score 8.7 out of 10
TOPdesk
TOPdesk
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
eMaint CMMSUpKeep Maintenance Management
Likelihood to Recommend
6.2
(6 ratings)
9.0
(25 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(6 ratings)
Support Rating
5.5
(2 ratings)
8.8
(23 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
eMaint CMMSUpKeep Maintenance Management
Likelihood to Recommend
Fluke Corporation
eMaint is well suited to larger facilities with dedicated scheduler/planners. Learning to navigate the database and create reports requires a dedicated resource. Part-time users often forget the process for entering data and navigating the database. In smaller organizations where multiple users enter assets, planned maintenance (PM) tasks and vendors, keeping standardization in the system formatting was difficult.
Read full review
UpKeep Maintenance Management
For companies that have larger facilities or multiple properties - this software is superb. You can track every maintenance plan - daily/weekly/monthly/annually - so nothing ever goes undone. I'm talking daily cleaning to refreshing the paint in the parking lot each year - you can easily schedule all of this maintenance within the app. Asset tracking - everything from machinery to tools to doors - you can tag and track all. Break/fix over time is huge - you can use the reporting function to see how many times something has broken over time - so now you can assess if it's more cost effective to replace rather than repair.
Read full review
Pros
Fluke Corporation
  • We like that eMaint is highly configurable. You can customize fields to meet your needs
  • You can store and track documents and photos assigned to your assets
  • You can run custom reports.
  • Great customer service
Read full review
UpKeep Maintenance Management
  • Tracking service issues - There's really no more excuses for not knowing when the machine was last serviced. Upkeep allows us to track that.
  • Scheduling - Knowing in advance which machines will need maintenance in the future allows us to actively prepare for shut-down periods.
  • General knowledge - Users can add their knowledge to the archives of each machine we have, helping to improve the trouble-shooting process.
  • Easy to update, easy to make - It's almost too easy to create and update files for locations, assets, parts, and issues.
Read full review
Cons
Fluke Corporation
  • Functionality not delivered as promised - on usage of tab.
  • QR code functionality.
  • Friction between implementation team and marketing team that sold this to us.
Read full review
UpKeep Maintenance Management
  • Periodic maintenance needs are still a little tricky keeping in the system without flooding the user with too many work orders.
  • It does not immediately update all the time. For example, closing out work orders and the number of total work orders stays the same until it’s rebooted.
  • Search functions need improving.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Fluke Corporation
No answers on this topic
UpKeep Maintenance Management
We love how organized it has made our processes.
Read full review
Usability
Fluke Corporation
No answers on this topic
UpKeep Maintenance Management
I think the platform is user-friendly but there have been some issues that colleagues have been complaining about. For example, the program tends to run slow from time to time. Reporting could be better. We could use more fields for categories under parts and assets.
Read full review
Support Rating
Fluke Corporation
Customer support was always readily available, even when natural disasters were taking place.
Read full review
UpKeep Maintenance Management
I cannot say enough great things about their customer service. From the start of the purchase, Upkeep was extremely helpful and informative. They have been ongoingly keeping us informed and available to answer any of our questions as they arise. They ongoing learning portal is also helpful when new features and changes happen with the interface.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Fluke Corporation
No answers on this topic
UpKeep Maintenance Management
Everything went as planned.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Fluke Corporation
eMaint was by far most the most comprehensive and customizable solution we looked at. The eMaint team was also extremely responsive and available during the selection process. The product training and conferences were very helpful for new user orientation and best practice learning. The customizable reports also allowed us to provide data to management in an easy to digest format
Read full review
UpKeep Maintenance Management
Previously had MEX, though had not implemented it throughout the business. It was way too difficult for the techs to use on the fly and was just a nightmare to implement. UpKeep, on the other hand, is a walk in the park.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Fluke Corporation
  • We easily track service events over multiple locations so we are able to save on costs
  • Able to run asset lists for inspections
  • Able to keep up with contracts' renewals and service costs
Read full review
UpKeep Maintenance Management
  • Compared to other task managers, the user cost for Upkeep is very high. But to the degree the staff are willing to work with you, it is completely justified.
  • The concern with an organization my size are items slipping through the cracks whether that is internally or by our renter base. Upkeep minimizes this to a great degree.
  • You need to get everyone within your organization to buy into upkeep. It can only be as good to the degree that it is utilized.
Read full review
ScreenShots

UpKeep Maintenance Management Screenshots

Screenshot of Product Suite