Miro provides a visual workspace for innovation that enables distributed teams of any size to dream, design, and build the future together. Today, Miro counts more than 60 million users in 200,000 organizations who use Miro to improve product development collaboration, to speed up time to market, and to make sure that new products and services deliver on customer needs.
$10
per month per user
Pricing
Miro
Editions & Modules
1. Free - To discover what Miro can do. Always free
$0
2. Starter - Unlimited and private boards with essential features
$8
per month (billed annually) per user
3. Business - Scales collaboration with advanced features and security
$16
per month (billed annually) per user
4. Enterprise - For work across the entire organization, with support, security and control, to scale
contact sales
annual billing per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Miro
Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
Additional Details
Monthly billing also available at $10 per month for the Starter plan, or $20 for the Business plan.
Miro does a phenomenal job at organizing and collating info. The tool is simple to use and enables collaboration across boundaries. The ease of use makes it rank higher than any other tool in its category.
In general Miro is just sleeker (is that a word?) in my opinion. I always admire Google’s drive to enhance their suite, but there’s usually always something missing or limited functionality that, when I get used to other systems like Miro, Google usually falls flat OR its just …
Miro is a lot easier to jump in for newbies to quickly create, design and draft up white boards workflows and on-going tasks for our whole team to see. Compared to the other tools I've tested, Miro seems a bit more intuitive and less complex to do simple tasks.
Each of the above products is also used in our environment, and has individual selling points: - Microsoft Visio is suitable for diagramming and flowcharting, - Microsoft Powerpoint is suitable for creating an illustrated narrative, and
pros and cons with each. I describe Miro as the wild wild west. I can be utilized just about any way you wish, and governance is difficult to control. In contrast, many other platforms lack the flexibility, but adds an element of consistency and structure.
Miro is more feature complete than fig jam but Figma has added a few fun quality of life features that make it a little bit more fun to use, but I could totally see Miro bringing in some of those interactions like cursor chat and high-fives
I'm not a UX pro, but for my needs, Miro blew away the competition for two main reasons. First, Miro is so incredibly easy to get set up with and get running. It's not intimidating to use and it's easy for anyone on my team to just jump in and collaborate with me (even those …
Many of these tools have their own use case. I typically turn to Miro for the ease of sharing information (competes with Google Drive and Box), the project planning (Drive/Box/Trello), the visual storytelling (competes with Figma, Illustrator), and data analysis (competes with D…
I used Mural before Miro. I liked that it had quite a few templates, but disliked how ugly things got quickly. the restrictive design system of Miro means that you have to work HARD to make things ugly (though my SOs certainly seem to find a way).
Miro offers a more versatile platform and with richer features compared to Microsoft Whiteboard. Also provides a more intuitive user interface. In a nutshell, we prefer Miro for its comprehensive and robust collaborative whiteboarding capabilities. Whiteboard has limited …
Miro stands out as a brainstorming and collaboration tool that supports cross collaboration and multiple inputs exceptionally well. It is especially good at providing templates to accelerate kick offs and diagraming logic with smart, connectors.
Miro has many more swim lanes and templates, along with much more added functionality. While Mind Map was a great product, Miro is like Mind Map on steroids. I've not encountered situations where Miro didn't work, I'm always successful with documenting what I'm thinking and …
Miro is the better option because there is no sync issue and more tools within the whiteboard. Some of the templates in Aha seem too generic or difficult to customize. In order to make these come to life, there is a lot of preparation needed before visualizing with a business …