Chose PandaDoc
PandaDoc vs. Qwilr
PandaDoc vs. Qwilr
Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
---|---|---|---|---|
PandaDoc | N/A | PandaDoc headquartered in San Francisco offers their eponymous electronic signature platform for sales teams, containing sales proposal automation and CPQ (configure, price, quote) features, and integration with CRMs. | $19 per user/per month | |
Qwilr | N/A | Qwilr is designed to change the way a business creates and shares documents on the web. This solution allows businesses to turn traditional documents into powerful and interactive webpages that look great on any device. The vendor says this in turn offers businesses access to analytics and other helpful tools when sharing quotes, proposals and presentations with clients. | $39 per month |
PandaDoc | Qwilr | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
Additional Details | PandaDoc offers a free eSign plan and 3 paid packages for eSigning and document automation starting at $19 per month per user. All plans include unlimited documents and eSignatures. Evaluations start with a free 14-day trial. | Qwilr is a freemium product. Users upgrade to the Business or Enterprise plans for access to premium features, like advanced analytics, security and branding controls, get sales material accepted, e-signed and collect payments via Stripe. | ||||||||||||||
More Pricing Information |
PandaDoc | Qwilr | |
---|---|---|
Considered Both Products | PandaDoc | Qwilr No answer on this topic |
Top Pros |
| |
Top Cons |
|
|
PandaDoc | Qwilr | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal Creation & Organization |
| ||||||||||||||||||
Proposal Collaboration & Workflow |
| ||||||||||||||||||
Proposal Delivery |
|
PandaDoc | Qwilr | |
---|---|---|
Small Businesses | PDFfiller Score 9.0 out of 10 | QuoteWerks Score 9.2 out of 10 |
Medium-sized Companies | MSB Docs Score 9.6 out of 10 | QuoteWerks Score 9.2 out of 10 |
Enterprises | Adobe Acrobat Sign Score 8.4 out of 10 | Conga CPQ Score 7.9 out of 10 |
All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
PandaDoc | Qwilr | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | 8.9 (270 ratings) | 8.4 (8 ratings) |
Likelihood to Renew | 9.0 (18 ratings) | 9.1 (1 ratings) |
Usability | 8.0 (23 ratings) | 9.0 (4 ratings) |
Availability | 9.1 (4 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Performance | 9.6 (21 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Support Rating | 5.2 (23 ratings) | 9.4 (5 ratings) |
Implementation Rating | 6.3 (4 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Configurability | 2.8 (3 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Ease of integration | 9.0 (20 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Product Scalability | 8.6 (4 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Vendor post-sale | 9.9 (20 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Vendor pre-sale | 6.7 (4 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
PandaDoc | Qwilr | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | PandaDoc | Qwilr |
Pros | PandaDoc | Qwilr |
Cons | PandaDoc | Qwilr |
Likelihood to Renew | PandaDoc | Qwilr |
Usability | PandaDoc | Qwilr |
Reliability and Availability | PandaDoc | Qwilr No answers on this topic |
Performance | PandaDoc | Qwilr No answers on this topic |
Support Rating | PandaDoc | Qwilr |
Implementation Rating | PandaDoc | Qwilr No answers on this topic |
Alternatives Considered | PandaDoc | Qwilr |
Scalability | PandaDoc | Qwilr No answers on this topic |
Return on Investment | PandaDoc | Qwilr |
ScreenShots | PandaDoc Screenshots | Qwilr Screenshots |