Reliability, accessibility, ease of use, and value for money
Overall Satisfaction with BlueJeans
BlueJeans is being used across the organization. It has become an invaluable tool in maintaining business function during the current coronavirus pandemic. It is absolutely indispensable. It allows teams to communicate with each other on a secure, stable platform that is user friendly and reliable. It has enabled the charity to benefit from the expertise of professionals and to attract new trustees who would otherwise not have been able to attend physical meetings.
Pros
- Host multiple participants with ease
- Is accessible for blind users using speech software
- Setting up meetings is particularly easy and efficient.
Cons
- Include an audible clue when participants want to contribute to a discussion - useful for a chair who is blind.
- Phone dial-in could be simplified.
- The name isn’t obvious or recognized - when suggesting to other companies that we use BlueJeans, they are all on Zoom or Teams (both are inferior).
- More productive meetings
- Shorter meetings
- Reduces travel time
- Attract new volunteers or directors
- Inclusive for individuals who are disabled and can’t physically attend meetings
- Zoom and Microsoft Teams
BlueJeans is far more user-friendly than Teams and far more reliable than Zoom.
The audio and video are far superior on BlueJeans, and it is much more accessible for participants who have sight loss.
The audio and video are far superior on BlueJeans, and it is much more accessible for participants who have sight loss.
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation